Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women.

Zust BL · Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2000 · Nonrandomized feasibility pilot

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

This pilot primarily informs feasibility, with substantial dropout among survivors; comparative efficacy is unestablished.

Recorded limitations

Nonrandomized groups differ in violence exposure; 50% survivor attrition and small sample undermine causal estimates.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
sources

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
sources

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
intervention
INSIGHT cognitive therapy. Twenty weeks.
comparator
Non-battered women in a two-group pre/post study.
sample
18 battered plus nine non-battered participants; no verified randomized sample.
measurement
Feasibility
timing
Twenty-week course
trial Id
relationship Note
Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope. See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Feasibility
    follow Up
    Twenty-week course
    result
    Half of battered participants dropped out.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Confidence interval included when stated; otherwise not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Primary versus secondary status not fully established; see finding for explicitly identified secondary outcomes.
quality
risk Of Bias
Provisional appraisal; see limitations, attrition and masking. No formal risk-of-bias score assigned.
attrition
50% attrition among battered women.
confounding
Nonrandomized exposure, secondary association, or unverified allocation limits causal interpretation.
adverse Findings
Adverse-event reporting not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm.
transfer Limits
Generalizability is limited to the stated population, setting and comparator.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
exposure Evidence
18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
rationale
Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope.
transfer Limit
See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-adult-therapy-10783523
doi
10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
pmid
10783523
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-9e9bc983af28
source Content Hash
9e9bc983af28f7d190185698dfe9e45a6c5f41b5b4e9f08a9876caf4d9b64424
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
0442f5ee4a6d51eec16a25854ddea9d1ff7fddf048351df12467cc33aab4aa91
prior Revision
r1-0442f5ee4a6d
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-adult-therapy-10783523
doi
10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
pmid
10783523
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
4345bfcfc09785b73775a4797857d0782797f8a6df6e9f291355cefbc829e660
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
INSIGHT-27-2000
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-adult-therapy-10783523
aliases
None recorded
title
Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women.
journal
Archives of psychiatric nursing
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2000
authors
Zust BL
design
Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
pmid
10783523
urls

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10783523/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
This pilot primarily informs feasibility, with substantial dropout among survivors; comparative efficacy is unestablished.
limitation
Nonrandomized groups differ in violence exposure; 50% survivor attrition and small sample undermine causal estimates.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
sources

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
sources

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
archivesofpsychiatricnursing
journal Label
Archives of psychiatric nursing
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-adult-therapy-10783523
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women.
    authors
    Zust BL
    year
    2000
    journal
    Archives of psychiatric nursing
    doi
    10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
    pmid
    10783523
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10783523/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    depression

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      depression
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women.
        matched Text
        depression
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    age Groups

    not-specified

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-adult-therapy-10783523
    collections

    language

    groups

    not-specified

    reported Ages
    Not established from accessed source.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    Not recorded
    source URL
    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: not-specified. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    This pilot primarily informs feasibility, with substantial dropout among survivors; comparative efficacy is unestablished.
    summary
    This pilot primarily informs feasibility, with substantial dropout among survivors; comparative efficacy is unestablished.
    limitation
    Nonrandomized groups differ in violence exposure; 50% survivor attrition and small sample undermine causal estimates.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
    intervention
    INSIGHT cognitive therapy. Twenty weeks.
    comparator
    Non-battered women in a two-group pre/post study.
    sample
    18 battered plus nine non-battered participants; no verified randomized sample.
    measurement
    Feasibility
    timing
    Twenty-week course
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope. See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Feasibility
      follow Up
      Twenty-week course
      result
      Half of battered participants dropped out.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Confidence interval included when stated; otherwise not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Primary versus secondary status not fully established; see finding for explicitly identified secondary outcomes.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Provisional appraisal; see limitations, attrition and masking. No formal risk-of-bias score assigned.
    attrition
    50% attrition among battered women.
    confounding
    Nonrandomized exposure, secondary association, or unverified allocation limits causal interpretation.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse-event reporting not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm.
    transfer Limits
    Generalizability is limited to the stated population, setting and comparator.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
    exposure Evidence
    18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
    rationale
    Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope.
    transfer Limit
    See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
    sources

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
    sources

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-9e9bc983af28
    source Content Hash
    9e9bc983af28f7d190185698dfe9e45a6c5f41b5b4e9f08a9876caf4d9b64424
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
    study Family Id
    INSIGHT-27-2000
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-adult-therapy-10783523
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    0442f5ee4a6d51eec16a25854ddea9d1ff7fddf048351df12467cc33aab4aa91
    prior Revision
    r1-0442f5ee4a6d
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-adult-therapy-10783523
    doi
    10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
    pmid
    10783523
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    4345bfcfc09785b73775a4797857d0782797f8a6df6e9f291355cefbc829e660
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-adult-therapy-10783523
    title
    Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women.
    authors

    Zust BL

    year
    2000
    journal
    Archives of psychiatric nursing
    doi
    10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
    pmid
    10783523
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    INSIGHT cognitive therapy.
    publication Type
    Primary intervention study
    study Family Id
    INSIGHT-27-2000
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
    exposure Evidence
    18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
    rationale
    Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope.
    transfer Limit
    See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
    age
    groups

    not-specified

    reported Range
    Not established from accessed source.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    country
    Not established from accessed source.
    setting
    Not established from accessed source.
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    Not recorded
    description
    18 battered plus nine non-battered participants; no verified randomized sample.
    intervention
    description
    INSIGHT cognitive therapy.
    dose
    Twenty weeks.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Non-battered women in a two-group pre/post study.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Feasibility
      follow Up
      Twenty-week course
      result
      Half of battered participants dropped out.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Confidence interval included when stated; otherwise not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Primary versus secondary status not fully established; see finding for explicitly identified secondary outcomes.
    finding
    This pilot primarily informs feasibility, with substantial dropout among survivors; comparative efficacy is unestablished.
    limitation
    Nonrandomized groups differ in violence exposure; 50% survivor attrition and small sample undermine causal estimates.
    design
    type
    Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
    randomization Evidence
    Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    No trial cross: randomization is not established for this report or analysis.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Provisional appraisal; see limitations, attrition and masking. No formal risk-of-bias score assigned.
    attrition
    50% attrition among battered women.
    confounding
    Nonrandomized exposure, secondary association, or unverified allocation limits causal interpretation.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse-event reporting not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm.
    transfer Limits
    Generalizability is limited to the stated population, setting and comparator.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core
      type
      Europe PMC core record sourced from PubMed/MEDLINE
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Primary-publication abstract and bibliographic metadata accessed; canonical PubMed record: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10783523/
      retrieval Query URL
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=TITLE_ABS%3A%28%22intimate+partner+violence%22+OR+%22domestic+violence%22+OR+%22battered+women%22%29+AND+TITLE_ABS%3A%28randomized+OR+randomised%29+AND+TITLE_ABS%3A%28therapy+OR+psychological+OR+psychotherapy+OR+cognitive+OR+counseling+OR+counselling+OR+%22motivational+interviewing%22%29&format=json&resultType=core&pageSize=1000
    2. url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5
      type
      Crossref DOI registration metadata
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:20:04.216901+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      DOI identity cross-check; metadata title: Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women. Correction/update relations checked.
    publication Status
    status
    ppublish
    correction Retraction Check
    europe PMCpub Types

    Clinical Trial · Journal Article

    crossref Update Relations
    None recorded
    crossref Relations
    crossref Checked
    true
    uncertainty
    No comprehensive publisher/Crossmark or registry audit claimed; correction/retraction absence is limited to accessed metadata.
    recommendation Rationale
    Retain as pending candidate evidence; interpret the study design, null outcomes and access limits together.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes

    Bibliographic identity and abstract-level evidence extracted; full-text appraisal remains limited unless explicitly stated. · Study-family label is retained separately from publication identity; this does not prove independence from every unpublished or secondary report.

    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    research Lane
    adult-therapy
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    0442f5ee4a6d51eec16a25854ddea9d1ff7fddf048351df12467cc33aab4aa91
    prior Revision
    r1-0442f5ee4a6d
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-adult-therapy-10783523
    doi
    10.1016/s0883-9417(00)80020-5
    pmid
    10783523
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    4345bfcfc09785b73775a4797857d0782797f8a6df6e9f291355cefbc829e660
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Two-group pilot pre/post design; random allocation not established.
    sources

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    No trial cross: randomization is not established for this report or analysis.
    sources

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
    exposure Evidence
    18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
    rationale
    Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope.
    transfer Limit
    See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
    intervention
    description
    INSIGHT cognitive therapy.
    dose
    Twenty weeks.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Non-battered women in a two-group pre/post study.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Feasibility
      follow Up
      Twenty-week course
      result
      Half of battered participants dropped out.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Confidence interval included when stated; otherwise not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Primary versus secondary status not fully established; see finding for explicitly identified secondary outcomes.
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    9e9bc983af28f7d190185698dfe9e45a6c5f41b5b4e9f08a9876caf4d9b64424
    revision
    audit-r2-9e9bc983af28
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Nonrandomized feasibility pilot
intervention
INSIGHT cognitive therapy. Twenty weeks.
comparator
Non-battered women in a two-group pre/post study.
sample
18 battered plus nine non-battered participants; no verified randomized sample.
measurement
Feasibility
timing
Twenty-week course
trial Id
relationship Note
Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope. See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:10783523%20AND%20SRC:MED&format=json&resultType=core · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fs0883-9417%2800%2980020-5

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:15:55.705516+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Feasibility
    follow Up
    Twenty-week course
    result
    Half of battered participants dropped out.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Confidence interval included when stated; otherwise not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Primary versus secondary status not fully established; see finding for explicitly identified secondary outcomes.
quality
risk Of Bias
Provisional appraisal; see limitations, attrition and masking. No formal risk-of-bias score assigned.
attrition
50% attrition among battered women.
confounding
Nonrandomized exposure, secondary association, or unverified allocation limits causal interpretation.
adverse Findings
Adverse-event reporting not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm.
transfer Limits
Generalizability is limited to the stated population, setting and comparator.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
exposure Evidence
18 rural battered women and nine non-battered comparison participants.
rationale
Explicit domestic/intimate-partner violence exposure in the studied population; psychological intervention is within Language scope.
transfer Limit
See limitation and quality fields; no population-wide clinical recommendation is implied.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    depression
    evidence
    1. field
      title
      text
      Effect of cognitive therapy on depression in rural, battered women.
      matched Text
      depression
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
conditions

depression

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library