Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Lieberman AF; Ghosh Ippen C; VAN Horn P · Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2006 · Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Child behavior benefits persisted six months after treatment. Maternal distress benefits were present for completers but not significant in intention-to-treat analyses.

Recorded limitations

Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
assessment
category
rct
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
basis
Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
2
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-confirmed
basis
Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
2
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
intervention
Child-parent psychotherapy (CPP) One year of weekly treatment; this is the six-month follow-up report.
comparator
Case management plus community treatment referrals.
sample
Original cohort 75; original 2006 analysis denominator unresolved. Linked 2011 reanalysis reports 27 CPP+25 comparison follow-ups; program-author 2018 summary lists 50 children with additional comparator exclusions. Do not treat these as interchangeable denominators.
measurement
Child behavior problems; Maternal general distress
timing
Six months after one-year treatment; Six-month follow-up
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Child behavior problems
    follow Up
    Six months after one-year treatment
    result
    CPP benefit persisted in completer and ITT analyses.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
  2. name
    Maternal general distress
    follow Up
    Six-month follow-up
    result
    Completer analyses favored CPP; ITT analyses were not significant.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
attrition
Linked 2011 reanalysis:2 CPP and 4 comparison additional losses after posttest;7 CPP dyads predating addition of follow-up were not assessed. Program-author 2018 summary also notes 2 comparator data exclusions. Original 2006 flow remains unverified.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not established
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
The 75 preschool mother-child dyads from the marital-violence CPP trial.
exposure Evidence
Population linkage to PMID16292115 establishes marital-violence exposure.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-children-16865033
doi
10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
pmid
16865033
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-3d1e45a422e0
source Content Hash
3d1e45a422e014f36a20f15a0bbaa6c85dcd97801640209994f390ea37470ffc
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
4afffc6d70e0e93668bfbc1a275784aa00236d6defaf8917321dbab5ff7994c3
prior Revision
r1-4afffc6d70e0
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-children-16865033
doi
10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
pmid
16865033
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
86e75e34407b76418252f3b50ab8ca5ed0b02b12117233639fc62588fd4bac35
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

applied Proposals

methods-children/proposed-deltas.json

method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
cpp-lieberman-2005-n75
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-children-16865033
aliases
None recorded
title
Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
journal
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2006
authors
Lieberman AF; Ghosh Ippen C; VAN Horn P
design
Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
pmid
16865033
urls

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Child behavior benefits persisted six months after treatment. Maternal distress benefits were present for completers but not significant in intention-to-treat analyses.
limitation
Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
rct
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
basis
Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
2
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-confirmed
basis
Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
2
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
journaloftheamericanacademyofchildandadolescentpsychiatry
journal Label
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-children-16865033
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    authors
    Lieberman AF; Ghosh Ippen C; VAN Horn P
    year
    2006
    journal
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    doi
    10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
    pmid
    16865033
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    children

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-children-16865033
    collections

    language

    groups

    children

    reported Ages
    3–5 years
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    focus
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: children. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Child behavior benefits persisted six months after treatment. Maternal distress benefits were present for completers but not significant in intention-to-treat analyses.
    summary
    Child behavior benefits persisted six months after treatment. Maternal distress benefits were present for completers but not significant in intention-to-treat analyses.
    limitation
    Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
    intervention
    Child-parent psychotherapy (CPP) One year of weekly treatment; this is the six-month follow-up report.
    comparator
    Case management plus community treatment referrals.
    sample
    Original cohort 75; original 2006 analysis denominator unresolved. Linked 2011 reanalysis reports 27 CPP+25 comparison follow-ups; program-author 2018 summary lists 50 children with additional comparator exclusions. Do not treat these as interchangeable denominators.
    measurement
    Child behavior problems; Maternal general distress
    timing
    Six months after one-year treatment; Six-month follow-up
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Child behavior problems
      follow Up
      Six months after one-year treatment
      result
      CPP benefit persisted in completer and ITT analyses.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Maternal general distress
      follow Up
      Six-month follow-up
      result
      Completer analyses favored CPP; ITT analyses were not significant.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
    attrition
    Linked 2011 reanalysis:2 CPP and 4 comparison additional losses after posttest;7 CPP dyads predating addition of follow-up were not assessed. Program-author 2018 summary also notes 2 comparator data exclusions. Original 2006 flow remains unverified.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not established
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    The 75 preschool mother-child dyads from the marital-violence CPP trial.
    exposure Evidence
    Population linkage to PMID16292115 establishes marital-violence exposure.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    basis
    Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    2
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    basis
    Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    2
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-3d1e45a422e0
    source Content Hash
    3d1e45a422e014f36a20f15a0bbaa6c85dcd97801640209994f390ea37470ffc
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    study Family Id
    cpp-lieberman-2005-n75
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-children-16865033
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    4afffc6d70e0e93668bfbc1a275784aa00236d6defaf8917321dbab5ff7994c3
    prior Revision
    r1-4afffc6d70e0
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-16865033
    doi
    10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
    pmid
    16865033
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    86e75e34407b76418252f3b50ab8ca5ed0b02b12117233639fc62588fd4bac35
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    applied Proposals

    methods-children/proposed-deltas.json

    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-children-16865033
    title
    Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    authors

    Lieberman AF · Ghosh Ippen C · VAN Horn P

    year
    2006
    journal
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    doi
    10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
    pmid
    16865033
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    Child-parent psychotherapy (CPP)
    publication Type
    Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
    study Family Id
    cpp-lieberman-2005-n75
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    linked Publication PMIDs

    16292115

    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    The 75 preschool mother-child dyads from the marital-violence CPP trial.
    exposure Evidence
    Population linkage to PMID16292115 establishes marital-violence exposure.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    age
    groups

    children

    reported Range
    3–5 years
    youth Scope
    focus
    country
    Not established from accessed source.
    setting
    Not established from accessed source.
    sample Size
    randomized
    75
    analyzed
    Not recorded
    description
    Original cohort 75; original 2006 analysis denominator unresolved. Linked 2011 reanalysis reports 27 CPP+25 comparison follow-ups; program-author 2018 summary lists 50 children with additional comparator exclusions. Do not treat these as interchangeable denominators.
    intervention
    description
    Child-parent psychotherapy (CPP)
    dose
    One year of weekly treatment; this is the six-month follow-up report.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Case management plus community treatment referrals.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Child behavior problems
      follow Up
      Six months after one-year treatment
      result
      CPP benefit persisted in completer and ITT analyses.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Maternal general distress
      follow Up
      Six-month follow-up
      result
      Completer analyses favored CPP; ITT analyses were not significant.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    finding
    Child behavior benefits persisted six months after treatment. Maternal distress benefits were present for completers but not significant in intention-to-treat analyses.
    limitation
    Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
    design
    type
    Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
    randomization Evidence
    Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    crosses
    1
    cross Rationale
    Randomized allocation is explicitly supported; double blinding is not established.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
    attrition
    Linked 2011 reanalysis:2 CPP and 4 comparison additional losses after posttest;7 CPP dyads predating addition of follow-up were not assessed. Program-author 2018 summary also notes 2 comparator data exclusions. Original 2006 flow remains unverified.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not established
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/
      type
      PubMed XML bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    2. url
      https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033
      type
      Europe PMC core bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    3. url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/
      type
      Primary methods evidence
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T08:28:09.078317+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Original abstract; publisher PDF returned403
    publication Status
    status
    Published journal report; no retraction/erratum relationship flagged in retrieved PubMed record.
    correction Retraction Check
    method
    Inspected PubMed publication types and CommentsCorrections relationships plus Europe PMC metadata.
    relationships
    None recorded
    checked At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    uncertainty
    Index metadata can lag; publisher Crossmark and trial-register reconciliation are not comprehensively verified.
    recommendation Rationale
    Adds controlled child/family treatment evidence; consider as a new candidate after human review.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Source-supported assessment with visible access limits; not a completed human approval or formal risk-of-bias instrument. This report does not represent an additional independent study when its family ID is shared. Linked 2011 primary reanalysis explicitly identifies the 2005/2006 data; supports shared family ID. Follow-up interview availability was limited; this is not evidence of sustained PTSD diagnostic remission. Original 2006 full methods remain inaccessible.
    research Lane
    children
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    related Family Evidence
    1. level
      selected-methods
      url
      https://childparentpsychotherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Ghosh-Ippen-Harris-Van-Horn-Lieberman-treatment-help-highest-risk.pdf
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T08:28:09.078317+00:00
      location
      2011 primary reanalysis pp505–508
      identity Verified
      true
    2. level
      program-author-summary
      url
      https://childparentpsychotherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CPP-research-fact-sheet-Jan-2018.pdf
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T08:28:09.078317+00:00
      location
      2018 research fact sheet pp2–3
      identity Verified
      true
    later Review Evidence
    id
    dv-children-16865033
    title
    Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    prior Revision
    r1-4afffc6d70e0
    prior Content Hash
    4afffc6d70e0e93668bfbc1a275784aa00236d6defaf8917321dbab5ff7994c3
    original
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ready-with-access-limits
    finding
    Child behavior benefits persisted six months after treatment. Maternal distress benefits were present for completers but not significant in intention-to-treat analyses.
    limitation
    Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    crosses
    1
    access
    abstract
    action
    supplement
    hold Current Revision
    false
    cross Verification On Hold
    false
    new Evidence
    A primary reanalysis reports 52 follow-up participants while a program-author summary reports 50. The original 2006 full text remains inaccessible from the attempted route.
    revised Interpretation
    The frozen distinction between child benefit and maternal completer-versus-ITT findings remains. Do not invent an exact analyzed denominator or treat a companion report as direct access to the 2006 methods.
    required Before Approval
    No new hold on the qualified abstract-level finding. Original flow/full methods are needed to reconcile the precise denominator.
    source URLs

    https://childparentpsychotherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Ghosh-Ippen-Harris-Van-Horn-Lieberman-treatment-help-highest-risk.pdf · https://childparentpsychotherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CPP-research-fact-sheet-Jan-2018.pdf

    source Location
    Reanalysis flow and program research summary
    assessment Changed
    false
    human Approval
    false
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    4afffc6d70e0e93668bfbc1a275784aa00236d6defaf8917321dbab5ff7994c3
    prior Revision
    r1-4afffc6d70e0
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-16865033
    doi
    10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92
    pmid
    16865033
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    86e75e34407b76418252f3b50ab8ca5ed0b02b12117233639fc62588fd4bac35
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    applied Proposals

    methods-children/proposed-deltas.json

    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    basis
    Abstract explicitly identifies the same 75 randomly assigned dyads as the 2005 CPP trial.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    2
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    basis
    Randomized allocation is explicitly supported; double blinding is not established.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    The 75 preschool mother-child dyads from the marital-violence CPP trial.
    exposure Evidence
    Population linkage to PMID16292115 establishes marital-violence exposure.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    intervention
    description
    Child-parent psychotherapy (CPP)
    dose
    One year of weekly treatment; this is the six-month follow-up report.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Case management plus community treatment referrals.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Child behavior problems
      follow Up
      Six months after one-year treatment
      result
      CPP benefit persisted in completer and ITT analyses.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Maternal general distress
      follow Up
      Six-month follow-up
      result
      Completer analyses favored CPP; ITT analyses were not significant.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    3d1e45a422e014f36a20f15a0bbaa6c85dcd97801640209994f390ea37470ffc
    revision
    audit-r2-3d1e45a422e0
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial
intervention
Child-parent psychotherapy (CPP) One year of weekly treatment; this is the six-month follow-up report.
comparator
Case management plus community treatment referrals.
sample
Original cohort 75; original 2006 analysis denominator unresolved. Linked 2011 reanalysis reports 27 CPP+25 comparison follow-ups; program-author 2018 summary lists 50 children with additional comparator exclusions. Do not treat these as interchangeable denominators.
measurement
Child behavior problems; Maternal general distress
timing
Six months after one-year treatment; Six-month follow-up
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16865033/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16865033

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Child behavior problems
    follow Up
    Six months after one-year treatment
    result
    CPP benefit persisted in completer and ITT analyses.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
  2. name
    Maternal general distress
    follow Up
    Six-month follow-up
    result
    Completer analyses favored CPP; ITT analyses were not significant.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Follow-up of the original CPP trial, not an independent replication; differential completer and ITT findings temper maternal-effect claims.
attrition
Linked 2011 reanalysis:2 CPP and 4 comparison additional losses after posttest;7 CPP dyads predating addition of follow-up were not assessed. Program-author 2018 summary also notes 2 comparator data exclusions. Original 2006 flow remains unverified.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not established
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
The 75 preschool mother-child dyads from the marital-violence CPP trial.
exposure Evidence
Population linkage to PMID16292115 establishes marital-violence exposure.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library