Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Effectiveness of specific factors in community-based intervention for child-witnesses of interparental violence: a randomized trial.

Overbeek MM; de Schipper JC; Lamers-Winkelman F; Schuengel C · Child abuse & neglect · 2013 · Group-randomized controlled trial

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

The IPV-focused program did not outperform the active comparison. Both groups improved on several child-reported and parent-reported symptoms.

Recorded limitations

Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Group-randomized controlled trial
assessment
category
rct
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
basis
Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
2
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-confirmed
basis
Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
2
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Group-randomized controlled trial
intervention
IPV-focused child-and-parent group intervention Not established from accessed source.
comparator
Active community group intervention based on nonspecific factors.
sample
Reported cohort/enrollment: 155. Analysis denominator not established from abstract.
measurement
Mental-health recovery; Teacher-rated externalizing problems
timing
Post-treatment and follow-up; Across assessments
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Mental-health recovery
    follow Up
    Post-treatment and follow-up
    result
    No superior recovery from IPV-specific intervention.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
  2. name
    Teacher-rated externalizing problems
    follow Up
    Across assessments
    result
    No reduction reported.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
attrition
Not established from accessed source.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not established
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
155 IPV-exposed children and parents.
exposure Evidence
Interparental-violence exposure was an explicit inclusion condition.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-children-23948313
doi
10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
pmid
23948313
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-1a3a7c10b488
source Content Hash
1a3a7c10b4885f49c8c4db8cbd73be00ad0edd7be76bd6e7188def2fd325d63b
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
7b200a5e37da01cf730f8551940367fbad5dc81a31aaec8c44386832f1a62e0e
prior Revision
r1-7b200a5e37da
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-children-23948313
doi
10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
pmid
23948313
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
2fae8b3d86dc767836717ba559e53a812cf6c3c93ee8aabaed7e6fe21fbb78c1
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
overbeek-ipv-group-2013-n155
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-children-23948313
aliases
None recorded
title
Effectiveness of specific factors in community-based intervention for child-witnesses of interparental violence: a randomized trial.
journal
Child abuse & neglect
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2013
authors
Overbeek MM; de Schipper JC; Lamers-Winkelman F; Schuengel C
design
Group-randomized controlled trial
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
pmid
23948313
urls

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
The IPV-focused program did not outperform the active comparison. Both groups improved on several child-reported and parent-reported symptoms.
limitation
Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
rct
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
basis
Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
2
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-confirmed
basis
Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
2
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
childabuseandneglect
journal Label
Child abuse & neglect
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-children-23948313
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Effectiveness of specific factors in community-based intervention for child-witnesses of interparental violence: a randomized trial.
    authors
    Overbeek MM; de Schipper JC; Lamers-Winkelman F; Schuengel C
    year
    2013
    journal
    Child abuse & neglect
    doi
    10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
    pmid
    23948313
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    children

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-children-23948313
    collections

    language

    groups

    children

    reported Ages
    6–12 years
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    focus
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: children. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Group-randomized controlled trial
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    The IPV-focused program did not outperform the active comparison. Both groups improved on several child-reported and parent-reported symptoms.
    summary
    The IPV-focused program did not outperform the active comparison. Both groups improved on several child-reported and parent-reported symptoms.
    limitation
    Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Group-randomized controlled trial
    intervention
    IPV-focused child-and-parent group intervention Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Active community group intervention based on nonspecific factors.
    sample
    Reported cohort/enrollment: 155. Analysis denominator not established from abstract.
    measurement
    Mental-health recovery; Teacher-rated externalizing problems
    timing
    Post-treatment and follow-up; Across assessments
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Mental-health recovery
      follow Up
      Post-treatment and follow-up
      result
      No superior recovery from IPV-specific intervention.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Teacher-rated externalizing problems
      follow Up
      Across assessments
      result
      No reduction reported.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed source.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not established
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    155 IPV-exposed children and parents.
    exposure Evidence
    Interparental-violence exposure was an explicit inclusion condition.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    basis
    Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    2
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    basis
    Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    2
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-1a3a7c10b488
    source Content Hash
    1a3a7c10b4885f49c8c4db8cbd73be00ad0edd7be76bd6e7188def2fd325d63b
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    study Family Id
    overbeek-ipv-group-2013-n155
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-children-23948313
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    7b200a5e37da01cf730f8551940367fbad5dc81a31aaec8c44386832f1a62e0e
    prior Revision
    r1-7b200a5e37da
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-23948313
    doi
    10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
    pmid
    23948313
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    2fae8b3d86dc767836717ba559e53a812cf6c3c93ee8aabaed7e6fe21fbb78c1
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-children-23948313
    title
    Effectiveness of specific factors in community-based intervention for child-witnesses of interparental violence: a randomized trial.
    authors

    Overbeek MM · de Schipper JC · Lamers-Winkelman F · Schuengel C

    year
    2013
    journal
    Child abuse & neglect
    doi
    10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
    pmid
    23948313
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    IPV-focused child-and-parent group intervention
    publication Type
    Group-randomized controlled trial
    study Family Id
    overbeek-ipv-group-2013-n155
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    linked Publication PMIDs
    None recorded
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    155 IPV-exposed children and parents.
    exposure Evidence
    Interparental-violence exposure was an explicit inclusion condition.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    age
    groups

    children

    reported Range
    6–12 years
    youth Scope
    focus
    country
    Not established from accessed source.
    setting
    Not established from accessed source.
    sample Size
    randomized
    155
    analyzed
    Not recorded
    description
    Reported cohort/enrollment: 155. Analysis denominator not established from abstract.
    intervention
    description
    IPV-focused child-and-parent group intervention
    dose
    Not established from accessed source.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Active community group intervention based on nonspecific factors.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Mental-health recovery
      follow Up
      Post-treatment and follow-up
      result
      No superior recovery from IPV-specific intervention.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Teacher-rated externalizing problems
      follow Up
      Across assessments
      result
      No reduction reported.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    finding
    The IPV-focused program did not outperform the active comparison. Both groups improved on several child-reported and parent-reported symptoms.
    limitation
    Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
    design
    type
    Group-randomized controlled trial
    randomization Evidence
    Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    crosses
    1
    cross Rationale
    Randomized allocation is explicitly supported; double blinding is not established.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed source.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not established
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/
      type
      PubMed XML bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    2. url
      https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313
      type
      Europe PMC core bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    publication Status
    status
    Published journal report; no retraction/erratum relationship flagged in retrieved PubMed record.
    correction Retraction Check
    method
    Inspected PubMed publication types and CommentsCorrections relationships plus Europe PMC metadata.
    relationships
    None recorded
    checked At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    uncertainty
    Index metadata can lag; publisher Crossmark and trial-register reconciliation are not comprehensively verified.
    recommendation Rationale
    Adds controlled child/family treatment evidence; consider as a new candidate after human review.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Source-supported assessment with visible access limits; not a completed human approval or formal risk-of-bias instrument. This report does not represent an additional independent study when its family ID is shared.
    research Lane
    children
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    7b200a5e37da01cf730f8551940367fbad5dc81a31aaec8c44386832f1a62e0e
    prior Revision
    r1-7b200a5e37da
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-23948313
    doi
    10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.007
    pmid
    23948313
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    2fae8b3d86dc767836717ba559e53a812cf6c3c93ee8aabaed7e6fe21fbb78c1
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    basis
    Abstract explicitly states group randomization to specific-factor versus control intervention.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    2
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    basis
    Randomized allocation is explicitly supported; double blinding is not established.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    155 IPV-exposed children and parents.
    exposure Evidence
    Interparental-violence exposure was an explicit inclusion condition.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    intervention
    description
    IPV-focused child-and-parent group intervention
    dose
    Not established from accessed source.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Active community group intervention based on nonspecific factors.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Mental-health recovery
      follow Up
      Post-treatment and follow-up
      result
      No superior recovery from IPV-specific intervention.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Teacher-rated externalizing problems
      follow Up
      Across assessments
      result
      No reduction reported.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    1a3a7c10b4885f49c8c4db8cbd73be00ad0edd7be76bd6e7188def2fd325d63b
    revision
    audit-r2-1a3a7c10b488
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Group-randomized controlled trial
intervention
IPV-focused child-and-parent group intervention Not established from accessed source.
comparator
Active community group intervention based on nonspecific factors.
sample
Reported cohort/enrollment: 155. Analysis denominator not established from abstract.
measurement
Mental-health recovery; Teacher-rated externalizing problems
timing
Post-treatment and follow-up; Across assessments
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23948313/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23948313

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Mental-health recovery
    follow Up
    Post-treatment and follow-up
    result
    No superior recovery from IPV-specific intervention.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
  2. name
    Teacher-rated externalizing problems
    follow Up
    Across assessments
    result
    No reduction reported.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Improvement in both active groups is not evidence that IPV-specific components add benefit; teacher-rated externalizing problems did not improve.
attrition
Not established from accessed source.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not established
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
155 IPV-exposed children and parents.
exposure Evidence
Interparental-violence exposure was an explicit inclusion condition.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library