Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Conduct Problems, Interventions, and Partner Contact With the Child.

Jouriles EN; Rosenfield D; McDonald R; Vu NL; Rancher C; Mueller V · Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2018 · Secondary analysis of a randomized trial

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Project Support reduced partner-child contact. Changes in contact tracked girls’ conduct problems, and contact was associated with further IPV and aggression toward children.

Recorded limitations

Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
basis
Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

review Scope
selected-methods
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
intervention
Project Support Up to 8 months; mean 20 home sessions plus brief telephone contacts.
comparator
Referral/support contacts (mean 3.7 over 8 months), mostly telephone; unrestricted outside services.
sample
Secondary cohort:66 families, originally randomized 32/34. Multilevel models use available data; visit-specific missingness not extracted.
measurement
Partner-child contact; Contact and child conduct
timing
Over 20 months
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Partner-child contact
    follow Up
    Over 20 months
    result
    Lower under Project Support.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
  2. name
    Contact and child conduct
    follow Up
    Over 20 months
    result
    Within-person association for girls, not boys.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Association does not establish that contact caused conduct problems.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
attrition
Not established from accessed source.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not established
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
66 IPV-exposed families leaving a domestic-violence shelter.
exposure Evidence
Mothers’ violent partners and children’s post-shelter contact were explicitly studied.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-children-27359091
doi
10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
pmid
27359091
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-234085a1474e
source Content Hash
234085a1474e3d179ca5ab513fab9109d7906f0461dbab073ec47abaa660d495
source Access
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
bec1dec79fb5dc053aa390ff3343487d4ec493c2be3e6fb6fd128a5ed857eceb
prior Revision
r1-bec1dec79fb5
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-children-27359091
doi
10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
pmid
27359091
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
85d58fd165082c7b412927877e6db2b1762d3d008aaa727511ac9a75071f1d09
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
project-support-2009-n66
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-children-27359091
aliases
None recorded
title
Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Conduct Problems, Interventions, and Partner Contact With the Child.
journal
Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2018
authors
Jouriles EN; Rosenfield D; McDonald R; Vu NL; Rancher C; Mueller V
design
Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
pmid
27359091
urls

https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Project Support reduced partner-child contact. Changes in contact tracked girls’ conduct problems, and contact was associated with further IPV and aggression toward children.
limitation
Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
basis
Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

review Scope
selected-methods
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
journalofclinicalchildandadolescentpsychology
journal Label
Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-children-27359091
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Conduct Problems, Interventions, and Partner Contact With the Child.
    authors
    Jouriles EN; Rosenfield D; McDonald R; Vu NL; Rancher C; Mueller V
    year
    2018
    journal
    Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    doi
    10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
    pmid
    27359091
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    children

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-children-27359091
    collections

    language

    groups

    children

    reported Ages
    4–9 years
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    focus
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: children. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Project Support reduced partner-child contact. Changes in contact tracked girls’ conduct problems, and contact was associated with further IPV and aggression toward children.
    summary
    Project Support reduced partner-child contact. Changes in contact tracked girls’ conduct problems, and contact was associated with further IPV and aggression toward children.
    limitation
    Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
    intervention
    Project Support Up to 8 months; mean 20 home sessions plus brief telephone contacts.
    comparator
    Referral/support contacts (mean 3.7 over 8 months), mostly telephone; unrestricted outside services.
    sample
    Secondary cohort:66 families, originally randomized 32/34. Multilevel models use available data; visit-specific missingness not extracted.
    measurement
    Partner-child contact; Contact and child conduct
    timing
    Over 20 months
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Partner-child contact
      follow Up
      Over 20 months
      result
      Lower under Project Support.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Contact and child conduct
      follow Up
      Over 20 months
      result
      Within-person association for girls, not boys.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Association does not establish that contact caused conduct problems.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed source.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not established
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    66 IPV-exposed families leaving a domestic-violence shelter.
    exposure Evidence
    Mothers’ violent partners and children’s post-shelter contact were explicitly studied.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    basis
    Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-234085a1474e
    source Content Hash
    234085a1474e3d179ca5ab513fab9109d7906f0461dbab073ec47abaa660d495
    source Access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
    study Family Id
    project-support-2009-n66
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-children-27359091
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    bec1dec79fb5dc053aa390ff3343487d4ec493c2be3e6fb6fd128a5ed857eceb
    prior Revision
    r1-bec1dec79fb5
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-27359091
    doi
    10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
    pmid
    27359091
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    85d58fd165082c7b412927877e6db2b1762d3d008aaa727511ac9a75071f1d09
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-children-27359091
    title
    Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Conduct Problems, Interventions, and Partner Contact With the Child.
    authors

    Jouriles EN · Rosenfield D · McDonald R · Vu NL · Rancher C · Mueller V

    year
    2018
    journal
    Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    doi
    10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
    pmid
    27359091
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    Project Support
    publication Type
    Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
    study Family Id
    project-support-2009-n66
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    linked Publication PMIDs

    19634963

    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    66 IPV-exposed families leaving a domestic-violence shelter.
    exposure Evidence
    Mothers’ violent partners and children’s post-shelter contact were explicitly studied.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    age
    groups

    children

    reported Range
    4–9 years
    youth Scope
    focus
    country
    Not established from accessed source.
    setting
    Home visits after domestic-violence shelter departure.
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    66
    description
    Secondary cohort:66 families, originally randomized 32/34. Multilevel models use available data; visit-specific missingness not extracted.
    intervention
    description
    Project Support
    dose
    Up to 8 months; mean 20 home sessions plus brief telephone contacts.
    provider
    Therapists; credentials not established in inspected methods.
    comparator
    Referral/support contacts (mean 3.7 over 8 months), mostly telephone; unrestricted outside services.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Partner-child contact
      follow Up
      Over 20 months
      result
      Lower under Project Support.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Contact and child conduct
      follow Up
      Over 20 months
      result
      Within-person association for girls, not boys.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Association does not establish that contact caused conduct problems.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    finding
    Project Support reduced partner-child contact. Changes in contact tracked girls’ conduct problems, and contact was associated with further IPV and aggression toward children.
    limitation
    Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
    design
    type
    Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
    randomization Evidence
    Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    Secondary mediation analysis receives no additional trial cross; original trial is separately classified.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed source.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not established
    access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/
      type
      PubMed XML bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    2. url
      https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091
      type
      Europe PMC core bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    3. url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/
      type
      Linked primary trial secondary report; selected methods inspected
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Methods explicitly link to Jouriles2009, confirm32 intervention/34 comparison, ages4–9 and home-based treatment. Original2009 article remains abstract access.
    publication Status
    status
    Published journal report; no retraction/erratum relationship flagged in retrieved PubMed record.
    correction Retraction Check
    method
    Inspected PubMed publication types and CommentsCorrections relationships plus Europe PMC metadata.
    relationships
    None recorded
    checked At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    uncertainty
    Index metadata can lag; publisher Crossmark and trial-register reconciliation are not comprehensively verified.
    recommendation Rationale
    Adds explicitly limited child/family evidence on outcomes, mechanisms or acceptability; consider as a new candidate after human review.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Source-supported assessment with visible access limits; not a completed human approval or formal risk-of-bias instrument. This report does not represent an additional independent study when its family ID is shared. Selected methods verified through linked PMC secondary report; shared family count preserved.
    research Lane
    children
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    bec1dec79fb5dc053aa390ff3343487d4ec493c2be3e6fb6fd128a5ed857eceb
    prior Revision
    r1-bec1dec79fb5
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-27359091
    doi
    10.1080/15374416.2016.1163706
    pmid
    27359091
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    85d58fd165082c7b412927877e6db2b1762d3d008aaa727511ac9a75071f1d09
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    basis
    Original trial randomized 32/34 after baseline; partner-child contact itself was observational.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Secondary mediation analysis receives no additional trial cross; original trial is separately classified.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    66 IPV-exposed families leaving a domestic-violence shelter.
    exposure Evidence
    Mothers’ violent partners and children’s post-shelter contact were explicitly studied.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    intervention
    description
    Project Support
    dose
    Up to 8 months; mean 20 home sessions plus brief telephone contacts.
    provider
    Therapists; credentials not established in inspected methods.
    comparator
    Referral/support contacts (mean 3.7 over 8 months), mostly telephone; unrestricted outside services.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Partner-child contact
      follow Up
      Over 20 months
      result
      Lower under Project Support.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    2. name
      Contact and child conduct
      follow Up
      Over 20 months
      result
      Within-person association for girls, not boys.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Association does not establish that contact caused conduct problems.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    234085a1474e3d179ca5ab513fab9109d7906f0461dbab073ec47abaa660d495
    revision
    audit-r2-234085a1474e
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Secondary analysis of a randomized trial
intervention
Project Support Up to 8 months; mean 20 home sessions plus brief telephone contacts.
comparator
Referral/support contacts (mean 3.7 over 8 months), mostly telephone; unrestricted outside services.
sample
Secondary cohort:66 families, originally randomized 32/34. Multilevel models use available data; visit-specific missingness not extracted.
measurement
Partner-child contact; Contact and child conduct
timing
Over 20 months
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359091/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27359091 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815933/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:33:53.473011+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Partner-child contact
    follow Up
    Over 20 months
    result
    Lower under Project Support.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
  2. name
    Contact and child conduct
    follow Up
    Over 20 months
    result
    Within-person association for girls, not boys.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Association does not establish that contact caused conduct problems.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Contact and mediation associations are observational despite the randomized intervention; sex-specific results and the 66-family sample limit generalization.
attrition
Not established from accessed source.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not established
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
66 IPV-exposed families leaving a domestic-violence shelter.
exposure Evidence
Mothers’ violent partners and children’s post-shelter contact were explicitly studied.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library