Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Facilitators to Engagement in a Mother-Child Therapeutic Intervention Following Intimate Partner Violence.

Fogarty A; Treyvaud K; Savopoulos P; Jones A; Cox A; Toone E; Giallo R · Journal of interpersonal violence · 2022 · Qualitative interview study

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Mothers identified clear referrals, flexible delivery and direct clinician communication as engagement facilitators; mistrust, blame and ongoing father contact could obstruct engagement.

Recorded limitations

Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Qualitative interview study
assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Not applicable.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Not applicable.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Qualitative interview study
intervention
Brief Relational Intervention and Screening (BRISC) Not established from accessed source.
comparator
Not applicable to qualitative design.
sample
Analyzed/interviewed: 16.
measurement
Engagement and acceptability
timing
After completion
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Engagement and acceptability
    follow Up
    After completion
    result
    Service flexibility and communication helped; ongoing contact and unmet maternal needs could hinder engagement.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
attrition
Not established from accessed source.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
Mothers whose children received a dyadic intervention after IPV exposure.
exposure Evidence
Direct child IPV-exposure intervention context.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-children-32515292
doi
10.1177/0886260520926316
pmid
32515292
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-ee7b73ac7981
source Content Hash
ee7b73ac7981f192a0b6d7bb4711435b45969dd65aa7e446020ed1f635147c37
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
855c253dbb74b6c8178cbd70c96054d0d4234787e6548ac0453e6081e31f2fb7
prior Revision
r1-855c253dbb74
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-children-32515292
doi
10.1177/0886260520926316
pmid
32515292
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
f65af660dc6489a7361da1502d013ed806c8520320448c588bd8bc6edbff83e2
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
brisc-fogarty-2022-n16
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-children-32515292
aliases
None recorded
title
Facilitators to Engagement in a Mother-Child Therapeutic Intervention Following Intimate Partner Violence.
journal
Journal of interpersonal violence
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2022
authors
Fogarty A; Treyvaud K; Savopoulos P; Jones A; Cox A; Toone E; Giallo R
design
Qualitative interview study
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1177/0886260520926316
pmid
32515292
urls

https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520926316 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Mothers identified clear referrals, flexible delivery and direct clinician communication as engagement facilitators; mistrust, blame and ongoing father contact could obstruct engagement.
limitation
Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Not applicable.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Not applicable.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
journalofinterpersonalviolence
journal Label
Journal of interpersonal violence
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-children-32515292
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Facilitators to Engagement in a Mother-Child Therapeutic Intervention Following Intimate Partner Violence.
    authors
    Fogarty A; Treyvaud K; Savopoulos P; Jones A; Cox A; Toone E; Giallo R
    year
    2022
    journal
    Journal of interpersonal violence
    doi
    10.1177/0886260520926316
    pmid
    32515292
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520926316 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    children

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-children-32515292
    collections

    language

    groups

    children

    reported Ages
    Not established from accessed source.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    included
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: children. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Qualitative interview study
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Mothers identified clear referrals, flexible delivery and direct clinician communication as engagement facilitators; mistrust, blame and ongoing father contact could obstruct engagement.
    summary
    Mothers identified clear referrals, flexible delivery and direct clinician communication as engagement facilitators; mistrust, blame and ongoing father contact could obstruct engagement.
    limitation
    Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Qualitative interview study
    intervention
    Brief Relational Intervention and Screening (BRISC) Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Not applicable to qualitative design.
    sample
    Analyzed/interviewed: 16.
    measurement
    Engagement and acceptability
    timing
    After completion
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Engagement and acceptability
      follow Up
      After completion
      result
      Service flexibility and communication helped; ongoing contact and unmet maternal needs could hinder engagement.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed source.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Mothers whose children received a dyadic intervention after IPV exposure.
    exposure Evidence
    Direct child IPV-exposure intervention context.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Not applicable.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Not applicable.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-ee7b73ac7981
    source Content Hash
    ee7b73ac7981f192a0b6d7bb4711435b45969dd65aa7e446020ed1f635147c37
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    study Family Id
    brisc-fogarty-2022-n16
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-children-32515292
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    855c253dbb74b6c8178cbd70c96054d0d4234787e6548ac0453e6081e31f2fb7
    prior Revision
    r1-855c253dbb74
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-32515292
    doi
    10.1177/0886260520926316
    pmid
    32515292
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    f65af660dc6489a7361da1502d013ed806c8520320448c588bd8bc6edbff83e2
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-children-32515292
    title
    Facilitators to Engagement in a Mother-Child Therapeutic Intervention Following Intimate Partner Violence.
    authors

    Fogarty A · Treyvaud K · Savopoulos P · Jones A · Cox A · Toone E · Giallo R

    year
    2022
    journal
    Journal of interpersonal violence
    doi
    10.1177/0886260520926316
    pmid
    32515292
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    Brief Relational Intervention and Screening (BRISC)
    publication Type
    Qualitative interview study
    study Family Id
    brisc-fogarty-2022-n16
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    linked Publication PMIDs
    None recorded
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    Mothers whose children received a dyadic intervention after IPV exposure.
    exposure Evidence
    Direct child IPV-exposure intervention context.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    age
    groups

    children

    reported Range
    Not established from accessed source.
    youth Scope
    included
    country
    Australia
    setting
    One metropolitan and one regional service site.
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    16
    description
    Analyzed/interviewed: 16.
    intervention
    description
    Brief Relational Intervention and Screening (BRISC)
    dose
    Not established from accessed source.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Not applicable to qualitative design.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Engagement and acceptability
      follow Up
      After completion
      result
      Service flexibility and communication helped; ongoing contact and unmet maternal needs could hinder engagement.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    finding
    Mothers identified clear referrals, flexible delivery and direct clinician communication as engagement facilitators; mistrust, blame and ongoing father contact could obstruct engagement.
    limitation
    Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
    design
    type
    Qualitative interview study
    randomization Evidence
    Not applicable.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    No verified randomized comparative treatment-effect claim for this report; no trial cross assigned.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Important concerns: Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed source.
    confounding
    Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
    transfer Limits
    Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/
      type
      PubMed XML bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    2. url
      https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292
      type
      Europe PMC core bibliographic/abstract record
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title and PMID matched between Europe PMC core metadata and PubMed XML; DOI, authors and journal metadata retained.
    publication Status
    status
    Published journal report; no retraction/erratum relationship flagged in retrieved PubMed record.
    correction Retraction Check
    method
    Inspected PubMed publication types and CommentsCorrections relationships plus Europe PMC metadata.
    relationships
    None recorded
    checked At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    uncertainty
    Index metadata can lag; publisher Crossmark and trial-register reconciliation are not comprehensively verified.
    recommendation Rationale
    Adds explicitly limited child/family evidence on outcomes, mechanisms or acceptability; consider as a new candidate after human review.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Source-supported assessment with visible access limits; not a completed human approval or formal risk-of-bias instrument. This report does not represent an additional independent study when its family ID is shared.
    research Lane
    children
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    855c253dbb74b6c8178cbd70c96054d0d4234787e6548ac0453e6081e31f2fb7
    prior Revision
    r1-855c253dbb74
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-children-32515292
    doi
    10.1177/0886260520926316
    pmid
    32515292
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    f65af660dc6489a7361da1502d013ed806c8520320448c588bd8bc6edbff83e2
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Not applicable.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    No verified randomized comparative treatment-effect claim for this report; no trial cross assigned.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed source.
    providers
    Not established from accessed source.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed source.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed source.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Mothers whose children received a dyadic intervention after IPV exposure.
    exposure Evidence
    Direct child IPV-exposure intervention context.
    rationale
    Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
    transfer Limit
    Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
    intervention
    description
    Brief Relational Intervention and Screening (BRISC)
    dose
    Not established from accessed source.
    provider
    Not established from accessed source.
    comparator
    Not applicable to qualitative design.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Engagement and acceptability
      follow Up
      After completion
      result
      Service flexibility and communication helped; ongoing contact and unmet maternal needs could hinder engagement.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      Not established from accessed source.
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed source.
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    ee7b73ac7981f192a0b6d7bb4711435b45969dd65aa7e446020ed1f635147c37
    revision
    audit-r2-ee7b73ac7981
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Qualitative interview study
intervention
Brief Relational Intervention and Screening (BRISC) Not established from accessed source.
comparator
Not applicable to qualitative design.
sample
Analyzed/interviewed: 16.
measurement
Engagement and acceptability
timing
After completion
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence. Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515292/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32515292

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:30.543090+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Engagement and acceptability
    follow Up
    After completion
    result
    Service flexibility and communication helped; ongoing contact and unmet maternal needs could hinder engagement.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    Not established from accessed source.
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed source.
quality
risk Of Bias
Important concerns: Interviews involved 16 mothers who completed BRISC, excluding noncompleters’ perspectives; findings concern acceptability and access, not efficacy.
attrition
Not established from accessed source.
confounding
Allocation, adherence, co-interventions and reporting limitations require consideration; see design and limitations.
adverse Findings
Adverse events not established from accessed source; absence of reporting is not absence of harm.
transfer Limits
Do not extrapolate beyond the described population and intervention.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed source.
providers
Not established from accessed source.
assessors
Not established from accessed source.
analysts
Not established from accessed source.
population
relation
direct
population
Mothers whose children received a dyadic intervention after IPV exposure.
exposure Evidence
Direct child IPV-exposure intervention context.
rationale
Direct study of a therapeutic intervention, its follow-up, or service engagement in children/families affected by domestic or interparental violence.
transfer Limit
Population and setting are specific; no inference of effectiveness for all survivors, ages or violence contexts.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library