Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial.
Lila M; Gracia E; Catalá-Miñana A · Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2018 · Randomized controlled trial
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Adding the motivational plan improved attendance dose and readiness to change and reduced self-reported physical violence.
Recorded limitations
Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomized controlled trial
- assessment
- category
- rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- trust Factor
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 2
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 2
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial
- intervention
- Standard batterer intervention plus individualized motivational plan 70 hours over nine months
- comparator
- Standard batterer intervention alone
- sample
- 160 men randomized
- measurement
- Self-reported physical violence; Intervention dose
- timing
- Post-treatment; During programme
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Self-reported physical violence
- follow Up
- Post-treatment
- result
- Favored motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- ITT OR 0.63
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied in abstract; PP OR 0.34
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Intervention dose
- follow Up
- During programme
- result
- Higher with motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- R²0.08
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Trial comparability and remaining biases need full methods appraisal.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- jadad
- not established
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Men convicted of IPV
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies men convicted of ipv.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-b7feaf347562
- source Content Hash
- b7feaf34756296cb79d98b8cad7a96eaaec7586b5abbc2534dac7b9507fd2d8b
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 1b8cf68b99a67d2bc20f18b74cc0dd8844339f02b037c0e31012611e86af9eef
- prior Revision
- r1-1b8cf68b99a6
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 0035f9c00d04fa7c8c54db57cedca93332f488e57cea086a2bf340ff5dd5ae53
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Family Id
- trial-paper:29648853
- family Linkage Uncertain
- true
- approaches
- None recorded
- id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial.
- journal
- Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2018
- authors
- Lila M; Gracia E; Catalá-Miñana A
- design
- Randomized controlled trial
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000291 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Adding the motivational plan improved attendance dose and readiness to change and reduced self-reported physical violence.
- limitation
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 2
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 2
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- journalofconsultingandclinicalpsychology
- journal Label
- Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-dv-dv-reviews-29648853
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial.
- authors
- Lila M; Gracia E; Catalá-Miñana A
- year
- 2018
- journal
- Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000291 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
adults
- age Population
- record Id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- collections
language
- groups
adults
- reported Ages
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- youth Source Note
- Not recorded
- source URL
- https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853
- basis Type
- source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
- community Matches
- category Id
- domestic-violence
- relation
- direct
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial
- origin
- approved-dv-20261101
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Adding the motivational plan improved attendance dose and readiness to change and reduced self-reported physical violence.
- summary
- Adding the motivational plan improved attendance dose and readiness to change and reduced self-reported physical violence.
- limitation
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial
- intervention
- Standard batterer intervention plus individualized motivational plan 70 hours over nine months
- comparator
- Standard batterer intervention alone
- sample
- 160 men randomized
- measurement
- Self-reported physical violence; Intervention dose
- timing
- Post-treatment; During programme
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Self-reported physical violence
- follow Up
- Post-treatment
- result
- Favored motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- ITT OR 0.63
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied in abstract; PP OR 0.34
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Intervention dose
- follow Up
- During programme
- result
- Higher with motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- R²0.08
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Trial comparability and remaining biases need full methods appraisal.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- jadad
- not established
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Men convicted of IPV
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies men convicted of ipv.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 2
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 2
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-b7feaf347562
- source Content Hash
- b7feaf34756296cb79d98b8cad7a96eaaec7586b5abbc2534dac7b9507fd2d8b
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- study Family Id
- trial-paper:29648853
- family Linkage Uncertain
- true
- approaches
- None recorded
- record Id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- source Pages
- None recorded
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 1b8cf68b99a67d2bc20f18b74cc0dd8844339f02b037c0e31012611e86af9eef
- prior Revision
- r1-1b8cf68b99a6
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 0035f9c00d04fa7c8c54db57cedca93332f488e57cea086a2bf340ff5dd5ae53
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- assessment Record
- id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- title
- Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial.
- authors
Lila M · Gracia E · Catalá-Miñana A
- year
- 2018
- journal
- Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- trial Registration
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- intervention Family
- Standard batterer intervention plus individualized motivational plan
- publication Type
- Randomized controlled trial
- study Family Id
- trial-paper:29648853
- family Linkage Uncertain
- true
- independent Primary Study
- true
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- relevance
- relation
- direct
- population
- Men convicted of IPV
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies men convicted of ipv.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- age
- groups
adults
- reported Range
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- country
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- setting
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- sample Size
- randomized
- 160
- analyzed
- Not recorded
- description
- 160 men randomized
- intervention
- description
- Standard batterer intervention plus individualized motivational plan
- dose
- 70 hours over nine months
- provider
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Standard batterer intervention alone
- outcomes
- name
- Self-reported physical violence
- follow Up
- Post-treatment
- result
- Favored motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- ITT OR 0.63
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied in abstract; PP OR 0.34
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Intervention dose
- follow Up
- During programme
- result
- Higher with motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- R²0.08
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- finding
- Adding the motivational plan improved attendance dose and readiness to change and reduced self-reported physical violence.
- limitation
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- design
- type
- Randomized controlled trial
- randomization Evidence
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- masking
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- crosses
- 1
- cross Rationale
- Random allocation is explicitly described; double blinding not established.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Trial comparability and remaining biases need full methods appraisal.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- jadad
- not established
- access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- sources
- url
- https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853
- type
- Europe PMC indexed publication metadata and abstract
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- PMID, DOI, title, journal and authors reconciled within the indexed source; full-text appraisal not claimed.
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- type
- Crossref publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:26:15.148056+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- DOI and normalized title match the Europe PMC record. Bibliographic verification only; not a full-text review.
- publication Status
- status
- Published journal article
- correction Retraction Check
- Europe PMC publication types and Crossref relation/update metadata checked. No retraction indicator found in these records.
- uncertainty
- Metadata checks do not guarantee absence of all notices or later changes.
- recommendation Rationale
- Contributes randomized evidence about individualized motivational planning in programmes for men convicted of IPV, with self-report limits explicit.
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- assessment Status
- assessed
- assessment Notes
- Abstract-level structured assessment; missing methods and reporting fields are explicit. The study family remains provisional unless anchored to a verified registration.
- identity Verification
- status
- cross-source-verified
- fields
DOI · title
- limitation
- Not recorded
- source Evidence Hashes
- crossref SHA256
- 5caf36e795954e8e67f8d30860229c0a5e6067fa63091026106b2bb648317a15
- review Readiness
- ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
- review Ready
- true
- research Lane
- reviews-prevention
- publication Recommendation
- status
- recommended-summary
- reason
- Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
- scope
- Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
- human Release Approval
- false
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 1b8cf68b99a67d2bc20f18b74cc0dd8844339f02b037c0e31012611e86af9eef
- prior Revision
- r1-1b8cf68b99a6
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-29648853
- doi
- 10.1037/ccp0000291
- pmid
- 29648853
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 0035f9c00d04fa7c8c54db57cedca93332f488e57cea086a2bf340ff5dd5ae53
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- basis
- Methods explicitly report160 men randomly assigned to standard intervention or intervention plus motivational plan.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 2
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- basis
- Random allocation is explicitly described; double blinding not established.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1037%2Fccp0000291
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Men convicted of IPV
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies men convicted of ipv.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- intervention
- description
- Standard batterer intervention plus individualized motivational plan
- dose
- 70 hours over nine months
- provider
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Standard batterer intervention alone
- outcomes
- name
- Self-reported physical violence
- follow Up
- Post-treatment
- result
- Favored motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- ITT OR 0.63
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied in abstract; PP OR 0.34
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Intervention dose
- follow Up
- During programme
- result
- Higher with motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- R²0.08
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- provenance
- Discovered by AI
- content Hash
- b7feaf34756296cb79d98b8cad7a96eaaec7586b5abbc2534dac7b9507fd2d8b
- revision
- audit-r2-b7feaf347562
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 5
- topic Id
- domestic-family-violence
- topic Title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial
- intervention
- Standard batterer intervention plus individualized motivational plan 70 hours over nine months
- comparator
- Standard batterer intervention alone
- sample
- 160 men randomized
- measurement
- Self-reported physical violence; Intervention dose
- timing
- Post-treatment; During programme
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/29648853 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29648853/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Self-reported physical violence
- follow Up
- Post-treatment
- result
- Favored motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- ITT OR 0.63
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied in abstract; PP OR 0.34
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Intervention dose
- follow Up
- During programme
- result
- Higher with motivational addition
- effect Estimate
- R²0.08
- uncertainty
- CI not supplied
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Trial comparability and remaining biases need full methods appraisal.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- jadad
- not established
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Men convicted of IPV
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies men convicted of ipv.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Self-report and therapist risk ratings are not equivalent to verified recidivism. Masking and allocation concealment are not established from abstract.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false