Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Interventions to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration by Men Who Use Substances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy.

Stephens-Lewis D; Johnson A; Huntley A; Gilchrist E; McMurran M; Henderson J; Feder G; Howard LM; Gilchrist G · Trauma, violence & abuse · 2021 · Systematic review and meta-analysis

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Some individual trials found short-term benefits, but pooled integrated interventions were not superior to usual substance-use treatment for IPV or substance use.

Recorded limitations

Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
assessment
category
review
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Systematic review and meta-analysis
intervention
Integrated IPV/substance-use treatment, adjunct substance-use treatment, and standalone IPV treatment; commonly CBT or motivational interviewing Not established from accessed abstract.
comparator
Treatment as usual for substance use
sample
Nine controlled trials; 1014 men
measurement
IPV perpetration; Substance use
timing
Varied
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    IPV perpetration
    follow Up
    Varied
    result
    No pooled superiority
    effect Estimate
    Not supplied in abstract
    uncertainty
    Four trials contributed
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
  2. name
    Substance use
    follow Up
    Varied
    result
    No pooled superiority
    effect Estimate
    Not supplied in abstract
    uncertainty
    Three trials contributed
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
quality
risk Of Bias
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
attrition
Not established from accessed abstract.
confounding
Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
adverse Findings
Not established from accessed abstract.
transfer Limits
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
population
relation
direct
population
Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
exposure Evidence
The accessed publication explicitly identifies adult heterosexual male ipv perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use.
rationale
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
transfer Limit
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-reviews-31711372
doi
10.1177/1524838019882357
pmid
31711372
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-f7f8985dedd7
source Content Hash
f7f8985dedd79b5313cf6e254c26a91e1e099c9c8a3d56917228eaea582c5e9c
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
6ee8c1c6a80ad71fb8eef25898864e45b42dcb7016920e83cc8732eaec51c0bb
prior Revision
r1-6ee8c1c6a80a
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-reviews-31711372
doi
10.1177/1524838019882357
pmid
31711372
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
931320702fe9a533e0ab23cbacb97a95bc0481d0e2adf9dd8329458fcf919c89
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
review:31711372
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-reviews-31711372
aliases
None recorded
title
Interventions to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration by Men Who Use Substances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy.
journal
Trauma, violence & abuse
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2021
authors
Stephens-Lewis D; Johnson A; Huntley A; Gilchrist E; McMurran M; Henderson J; Feder G; Howard LM; Gilchrist G
design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
kind
Review
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1177/1524838019882357
pmid
31711372
urls

https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019882357 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Some individual trials found short-term benefits, but pooled integrated interventions were not superior to usual substance-use treatment for IPV or substance use.
limitation
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
review
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
traumaviolenceandabuse
journal Label
Trauma, violence & abuse
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-reviews-31711372
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Interventions to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration by Men Who Use Substances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy.
    authors
    Stephens-Lewis D; Johnson A; Huntley A; Gilchrist E; McMurran M; Henderson J; Feder G; Howard LM; Gilchrist G
    year
    2021
    journal
    Trauma, violence & abuse
    doi
    10.1177/1524838019882357
    pmid
    31711372
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019882357 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    substance-use

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      substance-use
      evidence
      1. field
        population
        text
        Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
        matched Text
        alcohol
      2. field
        outcomes
        text
        IPV perpetration | Substance use
        matched Text
        Substance
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    age Groups

    adults

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-reviews-31711372
    collections

    language

    groups

    adults

    reported Ages
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    Not recorded
    source URL
    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Review
    design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Some individual trials found short-term benefits, but pooled integrated interventions were not superior to usual substance-use treatment for IPV or substance use.
    summary
    Some individual trials found short-term benefits, but pooled integrated interventions were not superior to usual substance-use treatment for IPV or substance use.
    limitation
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Systematic review and meta-analysis
    intervention
    Integrated IPV/substance-use treatment, adjunct substance-use treatment, and standalone IPV treatment; commonly CBT or motivational interviewing Not established from accessed abstract.
    comparator
    Treatment as usual for substance use
    sample
    Nine controlled trials; 1014 men
    measurement
    IPV perpetration; Substance use
    timing
    Varied
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      IPV perpetration
      follow Up
      Varied
      result
      No pooled superiority
      effect Estimate
      Not supplied in abstract
      uncertainty
      Four trials contributed
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    2. name
      Substance use
      follow Up
      Varied
      result
      No pooled superiority
      effect Estimate
      Not supplied in abstract
      uncertainty
      Three trials contributed
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    confounding
    Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
    adverse Findings
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    transfer Limits
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
    exposure Evidence
    The accessed publication explicitly identifies adult heterosexual male ipv perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use.
    rationale
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
    transfer Limit
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    review
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-f7f8985dedd7
    source Content Hash
    f7f8985dedd79b5313cf6e254c26a91e1e099c9c8a3d56917228eaea582c5e9c
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    study Family Id
    review:31711372
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-reviews-31711372
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    6ee8c1c6a80ad71fb8eef25898864e45b42dcb7016920e83cc8732eaec51c0bb
    prior Revision
    r1-6ee8c1c6a80a
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-reviews-31711372
    doi
    10.1177/1524838019882357
    pmid
    31711372
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    931320702fe9a533e0ab23cbacb97a95bc0481d0e2adf9dd8329458fcf919c89
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-reviews-31711372
    title
    Interventions to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration by Men Who Use Substances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy.
    authors

    Stephens-Lewis D · Johnson A · Huntley A · Gilchrist E · McMurran M · Henderson J · Feder G · Howard LM · Gilchrist G

    year
    2021
    journal
    Trauma, violence & abuse
    doi
    10.1177/1524838019882357
    pmid
    31711372
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    Integrated IPV/substance-use treatment, adjunct substance-use treatment, and standalone IPV treatment; commonly CBT or motivational interviewing
    publication Type
    Systematic review and meta-analysis
    study Family Id
    review:31711372
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    independent Primary Study
    false
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
    exposure Evidence
    The accessed publication explicitly identifies adult heterosexual male ipv perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use.
    rationale
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
    transfer Limit
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    age
    groups

    adults

    reported Range
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    country
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    setting
    Multiple study settings; distribution not established from abstract.
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    Not recorded
    description
    Nine controlled trials; 1014 men
    intervention
    description
    Integrated IPV/substance-use treatment, adjunct substance-use treatment, and standalone IPV treatment; commonly CBT or motivational interviewing
    dose
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    provider
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    comparator
    Treatment as usual for substance use
    outcomes
    1. name
      IPV perpetration
      follow Up
      Varied
      result
      No pooled superiority
      effect Estimate
      Not supplied in abstract
      uncertainty
      Four trials contributed
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    2. name
      Substance use
      follow Up
      Varied
      result
      No pooled superiority
      effect Estimate
      Not supplied in abstract
      uncertainty
      Three trials contributed
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    finding
    Some individual trials found short-term benefits, but pooled integrated interventions were not superior to usual substance-use treatment for IPV or substance use.
    limitation
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    design
    type
    Systematic review and meta-analysis
    randomization Evidence
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    confounding
    Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
    adverse Findings
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    transfer Limits
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372
      type
      Europe PMC indexed publication metadata and abstract
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      PMID, DOI, title, journal and authors reconciled within the indexed source; full-text appraisal not claimed.
    2. url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357
      type
      Crossref publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:26:04.939152+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      DOI and normalized title match the Europe PMC record. Bibliographic verification only; not a full-text review.
    publication Status
    status
    Published journal article
    correction Retraction Check
    Europe PMC publication types and Crossref relation/update metadata checked. No retraction indicator found in these records.
    uncertainty
    Metadata checks do not guarantee absence of all notices or later changes.
    recommendation Rationale
    Assesses integrated substance-use and IPV treatment for men, retaining pooled null findings.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Abstract-level structured assessment; missing fields are explicit. Review evidence is not counted as additional independent trials.
    identity Verification
    status
    cross-source-verified
    fields

    DOI · title

    limitation
    Not recorded
    source Evidence Hashes
    crossref SHA256
    d6753f426040696b7324765052a7bb86d1666d662718972b630c975d0cb2ceaa
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    review Ready
    true
    research Lane
    reviews-prevention
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    6ee8c1c6a80ad71fb8eef25898864e45b42dcb7016920e83cc8732eaec51c0bb
    prior Revision
    r1-6ee8c1c6a80a
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-reviews-31711372
    doi
    10.1177/1524838019882357
    pmid
    31711372
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    931320702fe9a533e0ab23cbacb97a95bc0481d0e2adf9dd8329458fcf919c89
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    review
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1524838019882357

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
    exposure Evidence
    The accessed publication explicitly identifies adult heterosexual male ipv perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use.
    rationale
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
    transfer Limit
    Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
    intervention
    description
    Integrated IPV/substance-use treatment, adjunct substance-use treatment, and standalone IPV treatment; commonly CBT or motivational interviewing
    dose
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    provider
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    comparator
    Treatment as usual for substance use
    outcomes
    1. name
      IPV perpetration
      follow Up
      Varied
      result
      No pooled superiority
      effect Estimate
      Not supplied in abstract
      uncertainty
      Four trials contributed
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    2. name
      Substance use
      follow Up
      Varied
      result
      No pooled superiority
      effect Estimate
      Not supplied in abstract
      uncertainty
      Three trials contributed
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    f7f8985dedd79b5313cf6e254c26a91e1e099c9c8a3d56917228eaea582c5e9c
    revision
    audit-r2-f7f8985dedd7
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Systematic review and meta-analysis
intervention
Integrated IPV/substance-use treatment, adjunct substance-use treatment, and standalone IPV treatment; commonly CBT or motivational interviewing Not established from accessed abstract.
comparator
Treatment as usual for substance use
sample
Nine controlled trials; 1014 men
measurement
IPV perpetration; Substance use
timing
Varied
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31711372 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711372/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    IPV perpetration
    follow Up
    Varied
    result
    No pooled superiority
    effect Estimate
    Not supplied in abstract
    uncertainty
    Four trials contributed
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
  2. name
    Substance use
    follow Up
    Varied
    result
    No pooled superiority
    effect Estimate
    Not supplied in abstract
    uncertainty
    Three trials contributed
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
quality
risk Of Bias
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
attrition
Not established from accessed abstract.
confounding
Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
adverse Findings
Not established from accessed abstract.
transfer Limits
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
population
relation
direct
population
Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
exposure Evidence
The accessed publication explicitly identifies adult heterosexual male ipv perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use.
rationale
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
transfer Limit
Small heterogeneous evidence base including randomized and nonrandomized studies. Individual positive findings do not establish superiority of the integrated approach.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    substance-use
    evidence
    1. field
      population
      text
      Adult heterosexual male IPV perpetrators in samples with at least 60% alcohol or drug use
      matched Text
      alcohol
    2. field
      outcomes
      text
      IPV perpetration | Substance use
      matched Text
      Substance
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
conditions

substance-use

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library