The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Travers Á; McDonagh T; Cunningham T; Armour C; Hansen M · Clinical psychology review · 2021 · Systematic review and meta-analysis
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Pooled results favored interventions through two years; effects beyond two years were not statistically clear.
Recorded limitations
Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- trust Factor
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- intervention
- IPV interventions including risk-need-responsivity approaches Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Other treatments or no-treatment controls, analyzed separately
- sample
- 31 studies: 17 treatment-comparison and 14 no-treatment-control studies
- measurement
- Recidivism; Recidivism; Recidivism
- timing
- Up to one year; One to two years; Beyond two years
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Up to one year
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.52
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- One to two years
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.60
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Beyond two years
- result
- No statistically clear pooled effect
- effect Estimate
- Not supplied in abstract
- uncertainty
- Long-term durability uncertain
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-2093621d28f4
- source Content Hash
- 2093621d28f4a8b075b8677122bb229f4ef1d16e60f392d1e71ed09fe8d34095
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- bfda363904a968ea8efd26743b926d8e7f0ccc3a21c70b24d62ac731a98f0cb0
- prior Revision
- r1-bfda363904a9
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- b5f7850509631192729dc5e54a536b7dd121f2a03dd2db6a90ea3af4b1591bc6
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Family Id
- review:33497921
- family Linkage Uncertain
- false
- approaches
- None recorded
- id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- journal
- Clinical psychology review
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2021
- authors
- Travers Á; McDonagh T; Cunningham T; Armour C; Hansen M
- design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- kind
- Review
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report · Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Pooled results favored interventions through two years; effects beyond two years were not statistically clear.
- limitation
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- clinicalpsychologyreview
- journal Label
- Clinical psychology review
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-dv-dv-reviews-33497921
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- authors
- Travers Á; McDonagh T; Cunningham T; Armour C; Hansen M
- year
- 2021
- journal
- Clinical psychology review
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report · Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
adults
- age Population
- record Id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- collections
language
- groups
adults
- reported Ages
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- youth Source Note
- Not recorded
- source URL
- https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921
- basis Type
- source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
- community Matches
- category Id
- domestic-violence
- relation
- direct
- kind
- Review
- design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- origin
- approved-dv-20261101
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Pooled results favored interventions through two years; effects beyond two years were not statistically clear.
- summary
- Pooled results favored interventions through two years; effects beyond two years were not statistically clear.
- limitation
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- intervention
- IPV interventions including risk-need-responsivity approaches Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Other treatments or no-treatment controls, analyzed separately
- sample
- 31 studies: 17 treatment-comparison and 14 no-treatment-control studies
- measurement
- Recidivism; Recidivism; Recidivism
- timing
- Up to one year; One to two years; Beyond two years
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Up to one year
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.52
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- One to two years
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.60
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Beyond two years
- result
- No statistically clear pooled effect
- effect Estimate
- Not supplied in abstract
- uncertainty
- Long-term durability uncertain
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-2093621d28f4
- source Content Hash
- 2093621d28f4a8b075b8677122bb229f4ef1d16e60f392d1e71ed09fe8d34095
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- study Family Id
- review:33497921
- family Linkage Uncertain
- false
- approaches
- None recorded
- record Id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- source Pages
- None recorded
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- bfda363904a968ea8efd26743b926d8e7f0ccc3a21c70b24d62ac731a98f0cb0
- prior Revision
- r1-bfda363904a9
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- b5f7850509631192729dc5e54a536b7dd121f2a03dd2db6a90ea3af4b1591bc6
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- assessment Record
- id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- title
- The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- authors
Travers Á · McDonagh T · Cunningham T · Armour C · Hansen M
- year
- 2021
- journal
- Clinical psychology review
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- trial Registration
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- intervention Family
- IPV interventions including risk-need-responsivity approaches
- publication Type
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- study Family Id
- review:33497921
- family Linkage Uncertain
- false
- independent Primary Study
- false
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- relevance
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- age
- groups
adults
- reported Range
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- country
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- setting
- Multiple study settings; distribution not established from abstract.
- sample Size
- randomized
- Not recorded
- analyzed
- Not recorded
- description
- 31 studies: 17 treatment-comparison and 14 no-treatment-control studies
- intervention
- description
- IPV interventions including risk-need-responsivity approaches
- dose
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- provider
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Other treatments or no-treatment controls, analyzed separately
- outcomes
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Up to one year
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.52
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- One to two years
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.60
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Beyond two years
- result
- No statistically clear pooled effect
- effect Estimate
- Not supplied in abstract
- uncertainty
- Long-term durability uncertain
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- finding
- Pooled results favored interventions through two years; effects beyond two years were not statistically clear.
- limitation
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- design
- type
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- randomization Evidence
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- masking
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- crosses
- 0
- cross Rationale
- Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- jadad
- not applicable
- access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- sources
- url
- https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921
- type
- Europe PMC indexed publication metadata and abstract
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- PMID, DOI, title, journal and authors reconciled within the indexed source; full-text appraisal not claimed.
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- type
- Crossref publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:26:06.471383+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- DOI and normalized title match the Europe PMC record. Bibliographic verification only; not a full-text review.
- publication Status
- status
- Published journal article
- correction Retraction Check
- Europe PMC publication types and Crossref relation/update metadata checked. No retraction indicator found in these records.
- uncertainty
- Metadata checks do not guarantee absence of all notices or later changes.
- recommendation Rationale
- Maps perpetrator recidivism evidence and uncertain longer-term durability across heterogeneous programmes.
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- assessment Status
- assessed
- assessment Notes
- Abstract-level structured assessment; missing fields are explicit. Review evidence is not counted as additional independent trials.
- identity Verification
- status
- cross-source-verified
- fields
DOI · title
- limitation
- Not recorded
- source Evidence Hashes
- crossref SHA256
- ccfcc8c7be2596eeca0b58946dd84cdf5bcc6ec738c3e45ea843bb52d960800c
- review Readiness
- ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
- review Ready
- true
- research Lane
- reviews-prevention
- publication Recommendation
- status
- recommended-summary
- reason
- Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
- scope
- Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
- human Release Approval
- false
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- bfda363904a968ea8efd26743b926d8e7f0ccc3a21c70b24d62ac731a98f0cb0
- prior Revision
- r1-bfda363904a9
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-33497921
- doi
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
- pmid
- 33497921
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- b5f7850509631192729dc5e54a536b7dd121f2a03dd2db6a90ea3af4b1591bc6
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.cpr.2021.101974
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 0
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- intervention
- description
- IPV interventions including risk-need-responsivity approaches
- dose
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- provider
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Other treatments or no-treatment controls, analyzed separately
- outcomes
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Up to one year
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.52
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- One to two years
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.60
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Beyond two years
- result
- No statistically clear pooled effect
- effect Estimate
- Not supplied in abstract
- uncertainty
- Long-term durability uncertain
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- provenance
- Discovered by AI
- content Hash
- 2093621d28f4a8b075b8677122bb229f4ef1d16e60f392d1e71ed09fe8d34095
- revision
- audit-r2-2093621d28f4
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 5
- topic Id
- domestic-family-violence
- topic Title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- intervention
- IPV interventions including risk-need-responsivity approaches Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Other treatments or no-treatment controls, analyzed separately
- sample
- 31 studies: 17 treatment-comparison and 14 no-treatment-control studies
- measurement
- Recidivism; Recidivism; Recidivism
- timing
- Up to one year; One to two years; Beyond two years
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33497921 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33497921/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Up to one year
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.52
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- One to two years
- result
- Favored interventions
- effect Estimate
- OR 0.60
- uncertainty
- 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- name
- Recidivism
- follow Up
- Beyond two years
- result
- No statistically clear pooled effect
- effect Estimate
- Not supplied in abstract
- uncertainty
- Long-term durability uncertain
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Mixed designs and intervention types; risk-need-responsivity subgroup findings are suggestive and do not prove superiority in a single comparable trial.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false