Motivational Interview Techniques and the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs With Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.
Pinto E Silva T; Cunha O; Caridade S · Trauma, violence & abuse · 2023 · Systematic review
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
The review reported improvements in engagement, adherence and motivation, especially for participants initially less ready to change.
Recorded limitations
Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Systematic review
- assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- trust Factor
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Systematic review
- intervention
- Motivational interviewing before, alongside, or as the intervention Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Varied programme comparisons
- sample
- 15 studies
- measurement
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- timing
- Study-specific
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- follow Up
- Study-specific
- result
- Reported improvements
- effect Estimate
- Not pooled
- uncertainty
- Evidence design and intervention heterogeneity
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators in intervention programmes
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators in intervention programmes.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-d1764b81619f
- source Content Hash
- d1764b81619f1f060bf523dc68f4a9dcfe07a0165dca4dcdc2154f9282cc7e86
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 2d2552b4e9c66b8aaf1cbcff26a8839e79f9f57484bb4e471711d835b4759f3c
- prior Revision
- r1-2d2552b4e9c6
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 6cefaa6af759464487889384f205c3849463f8e5ec80f35fa0e15bceaffeeb65
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Family Id
- review:35793513
- family Linkage Uncertain
- false
- approaches
- None recorded
- id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Motivational Interview Techniques and the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs With Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.
- journal
- Trauma, violence & abuse
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2023
- authors
- Pinto E Silva T; Cunha O; Caridade S
- design
- Systematic review
- kind
- Review
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221111472 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report · Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- The review reported improvements in engagement, adherence and motivation, especially for participants initially less ready to change.
- limitation
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- traumaviolenceandabuse
- journal Label
- Trauma, violence & abuse
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-dv-dv-reviews-35793513
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Motivational Interview Techniques and the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs With Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.
- authors
- Pinto E Silva T; Cunha O; Caridade S
- year
- 2023
- journal
- Trauma, violence & abuse
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221111472 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report · Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
adults
- age Population
- record Id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- collections
language
- groups
adults
- reported Ages
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- youth Source Note
- Not recorded
- source URL
- https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513
- basis Type
- source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
- community Matches
- category Id
- domestic-violence
- relation
- direct
- kind
- Review
- design
- Systematic review
- origin
- approved-dv-20261101
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- The review reported improvements in engagement, adherence and motivation, especially for participants initially less ready to change.
- summary
- The review reported improvements in engagement, adherence and motivation, especially for participants initially less ready to change.
- limitation
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Systematic review
- intervention
- Motivational interviewing before, alongside, or as the intervention Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Varied programme comparisons
- sample
- 15 studies
- measurement
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- timing
- Study-specific
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- follow Up
- Study-specific
- result
- Reported improvements
- effect Estimate
- Not pooled
- uncertainty
- Evidence design and intervention heterogeneity
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators in intervention programmes
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators in intervention programmes.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-d1764b81619f
- source Content Hash
- d1764b81619f1f060bf523dc68f4a9dcfe07a0165dca4dcdc2154f9282cc7e86
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- study Family Id
- review:35793513
- family Linkage Uncertain
- false
- approaches
- None recorded
- record Id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- source Pages
- None recorded
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 2d2552b4e9c66b8aaf1cbcff26a8839e79f9f57484bb4e471711d835b4759f3c
- prior Revision
- r1-2d2552b4e9c6
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 6cefaa6af759464487889384f205c3849463f8e5ec80f35fa0e15bceaffeeb65
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- assessment Record
- id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- title
- Motivational Interview Techniques and the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs With Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.
- authors
Pinto E Silva T · Cunha O · Caridade S
- year
- 2023
- journal
- Trauma, violence & abuse
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- trial Registration
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- intervention Family
- Motivational interviewing before, alongside, or as the intervention
- publication Type
- Systematic review
- study Family Id
- review:35793513
- family Linkage Uncertain
- false
- independent Primary Study
- false
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- relevance
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators in intervention programmes
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators in intervention programmes.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- age
- groups
adults
- reported Range
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- country
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- setting
- Multiple study settings; distribution not established from abstract.
- sample Size
- randomized
- Not recorded
- analyzed
- Not recorded
- description
- 15 studies
- intervention
- description
- Motivational interviewing before, alongside, or as the intervention
- dose
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- provider
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Varied programme comparisons
- outcomes
- name
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- follow Up
- Study-specific
- result
- Reported improvements
- effect Estimate
- Not pooled
- uncertainty
- Evidence design and intervention heterogeneity
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- finding
- The review reported improvements in engagement, adherence and motivation, especially for participants initially less ready to change.
- limitation
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- design
- type
- Systematic review
- randomization Evidence
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- masking
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- crosses
- 0
- cross Rationale
- Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- jadad
- not applicable
- access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- sources
- url
- https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513
- type
- Europe PMC indexed publication metadata and abstract
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- PMID, DOI, title, journal and authors reconciled within the indexed source; full-text appraisal not claimed.
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- type
- Crossref publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:26:10.899985+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- DOI and normalized title match the Europe PMC record. Bibliographic verification only; not a full-text review.
- publication Status
- status
- Published journal article
- correction Retraction Check
- Europe PMC publication types and Crossref relation/update metadata checked. No retraction indicator found in these records.
- uncertainty
- Metadata checks do not guarantee absence of all notices or later changes.
- recommendation Rationale
- Maps motivational interviewing in perpetrator programmes while distinguishing engagement from demonstrated reductions in partner harm.
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- assessment Status
- assessed
- assessment Notes
- Abstract-level structured assessment; missing fields are explicit. Review evidence is not counted as additional independent trials.
- identity Verification
- status
- cross-source-verified
- fields
DOI · title
- limitation
- Not recorded
- source Evidence Hashes
- crossref SHA256
- aedf579b6cd05ea4eb0e7a2ef37b05774f8a40fd7ae76f5758e8d4b35c1befee
- review Readiness
- ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
- review Ready
- true
- research Lane
- reviews-prevention
- publication Recommendation
- status
- recommended-summary
- reason
- Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
- scope
- Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
- human Release Approval
- false
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 2d2552b4e9c66b8aaf1cbcff26a8839e79f9f57484bb4e471711d835b4759f3c
- prior Revision
- r1-2d2552b4e9c6
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-reviews-35793513
- doi
- 10.1177/15248380221111472
- pmid
- 35793513
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 6cefaa6af759464487889384f205c3849463f8e5ec80f35fa0e15bceaffeeb65
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
- sources
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380221111472
- review Scope
- abstract
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 0
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators in intervention programmes
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators in intervention programmes.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- intervention
- description
- Motivational interviewing before, alongside, or as the intervention
- dose
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- provider
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Varied programme comparisons
- outcomes
- name
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- follow Up
- Study-specific
- result
- Reported improvements
- effect Estimate
- Not pooled
- uncertainty
- Evidence design and intervention heterogeneity
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- provenance
- Discovered by AI
- content Hash
- d1764b81619f1f060bf523dc68f4a9dcfe07a0165dca4dcdc2154f9282cc7e86
- revision
- audit-r2-d1764b81619f
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 5
- topic Id
- domestic-family-violence
- topic Title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Systematic review
- intervention
- Motivational interviewing before, alongside, or as the intervention Not established from accessed abstract.
- comparator
- Varied programme comparisons
- sample
- 15 studies
- measurement
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- timing
- Study-specific
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- abstract
- source URLs
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/35793513 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35793513/
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- Attendance/adherence/motivation
- follow Up
- Study-specific
- result
- Reported improvements
- effect Estimate
- Not pooled
- uncertainty
- Evidence design and intervention heterogeneity
- primary Status
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- attrition
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- confounding
- Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
- adverse Findings
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- transfer Limits
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- providers
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- assessors
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- analysts
- Not established from accessed abstract.
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- IPV perpetrators in intervention programmes
- exposure Evidence
- The accessed publication explicitly identifies ipv perpetrators in intervention programmes.
- rationale
- Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
- transfer Limit
- Narrative findings on attendance and attitudes do not establish reduced partner harm or recidivism. Quantitative pooled effects were not provided.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false