Universal Informatics · Research reading room

The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Sousa M; Andrade J; de Castro Rodrigues A; Caridade S; Cunha O · Trauma, violence & abuse · 2024 · Systematic review

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Some substance-use programmes showed promising behaviour changes; mental-health-focused programmes did not show significant between-condition effects despite within-group improvement.

Recorded limitations

Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Systematic review
assessment
category
review
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Systematic review
intervention
Psychological perpetrator programmes, commonly CBT or motivational interviewing Not established from accessed abstract.
comparator
Varied controlled or pre/post comparisons
sample
23 studies covering13 interventions
measurement
IPV behaviours/attitudes; Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
timing
Study-specific
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    IPV behaviours/attitudes
    follow Up
    Study-specific
    result
    Some favorable findings for substance-use interventions
    effect Estimate
    Not pooled
    uncertainty
    Heterogeneous methods
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
  2. name
    Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
    follow Up
    Study-specific
    result
    No clear between-condition benefit
    effect Estimate
    Not pooled
    uncertainty
    Only two programmes
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
quality
risk Of Bias
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
attrition
Not established from accessed abstract.
confounding
Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
adverse Findings
Not established from accessed abstract.
transfer Limits
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
population
relation
direct
population
Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
exposure Evidence
The accessed publication explicitly identifies male ipv perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems.
rationale
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
transfer Limit
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-reviews-39180467
doi
10.1177/15248380241270063
pmid
39180467
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-776b7b9996f8
source Content Hash
776b7b9996f8d354aa4e018ca196da92aaaece9248d1300471156d85f1b984bd
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
eedd52ef0e88bc43a8ce1b7494f14fa501cefaa8b6e9f64d2d7f3d20ca2dfc0b
prior Revision
r1-eedd52ef0e88
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-reviews-39180467
doi
10.1177/15248380241270063
pmid
39180467
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
c2061a0c38e01b6200a77000a69c2185208e6ecf80fd3ae213cf337a4c479799
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
review:39180467
family Linkage Uncertain
false
approaches
None recorded
id
dv-reviews-39180467
aliases
None recorded
title
The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
journal
Trauma, violence & abuse
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2024
authors
Sousa M; Andrade J; de Castro Rodrigues A; Caridade S; Cunha O
design
Systematic review
kind
Review
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1177/15248380241270063
pmid
39180467
urls

https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241270063 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Some substance-use programmes showed promising behaviour changes; mental-health-focused programmes did not show significant between-condition effects despite within-group improvement.
limitation
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
review
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
sources

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
traumaviolenceandabuse
journal Label
Trauma, violence & abuse
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-dv-dv-reviews-39180467
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
    authors
    Sousa M; Andrade J; de Castro Rodrigues A; Caridade S; Cunha O
    year
    2024
    journal
    Trauma, violence & abuse
    doi
    10.1177/15248380241270063
    pmid
    39180467
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241270063 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/ · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report · Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    substance-use

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      substance-use
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
        matched Text
        Substance
      2. field
        population
        text
        Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
        matched Text
        substance
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    age Groups

    adults

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-reviews-39180467
    collections

    language

    groups

    adults

    reported Ages
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    Not recorded
    source URL
    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Review
    design
    Systematic review
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Some substance-use programmes showed promising behaviour changes; mental-health-focused programmes did not show significant between-condition effects despite within-group improvement.
    summary
    Some substance-use programmes showed promising behaviour changes; mental-health-focused programmes did not show significant between-condition effects despite within-group improvement.
    limitation
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Systematic review
    intervention
    Psychological perpetrator programmes, commonly CBT or motivational interviewing Not established from accessed abstract.
    comparator
    Varied controlled or pre/post comparisons
    sample
    23 studies covering13 interventions
    measurement
    IPV behaviours/attitudes; Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
    timing
    Study-specific
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      IPV behaviours/attitudes
      follow Up
      Study-specific
      result
      Some favorable findings for substance-use interventions
      effect Estimate
      Not pooled
      uncertainty
      Heterogeneous methods
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    2. name
      Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
      follow Up
      Study-specific
      result
      No clear between-condition benefit
      effect Estimate
      Not pooled
      uncertainty
      Only two programmes
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    confounding
    Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
    adverse Findings
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    transfer Limits
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
    exposure Evidence
    The accessed publication explicitly identifies male ipv perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems.
    rationale
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
    transfer Limit
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    review
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-776b7b9996f8
    source Content Hash
    776b7b9996f8d354aa4e018ca196da92aaaece9248d1300471156d85f1b984bd
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    study Family Id
    review:39180467
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    approaches
    None recorded
    record Id
    dv-reviews-39180467
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    eedd52ef0e88bc43a8ce1b7494f14fa501cefaa8b6e9f64d2d7f3d20ca2dfc0b
    prior Revision
    r1-eedd52ef0e88
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-reviews-39180467
    doi
    10.1177/15248380241270063
    pmid
    39180467
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    c2061a0c38e01b6200a77000a69c2185208e6ecf80fd3ae213cf337a4c479799
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-reviews-39180467
    title
    The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
    authors

    Sousa M · Andrade J · de Castro Rodrigues A · Caridade S · Cunha O

    year
    2024
    journal
    Trauma, violence & abuse
    doi
    10.1177/15248380241270063
    pmid
    39180467
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    intervention Family
    Psychological perpetrator programmes, commonly CBT or motivational interviewing
    publication Type
    Systematic review
    study Family Id
    review:39180467
    family Linkage Uncertain
    false
    independent Primary Study
    false
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
    exposure Evidence
    The accessed publication explicitly identifies male ipv perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems.
    rationale
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
    transfer Limit
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    age
    groups

    adults

    reported Range
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    country
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    setting
    Multiple study settings; distribution not established from abstract.
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    Not recorded
    description
    23 studies covering13 interventions
    intervention
    description
    Psychological perpetrator programmes, commonly CBT or motivational interviewing
    dose
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    provider
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    comparator
    Varied controlled or pre/post comparisons
    outcomes
    1. name
      IPV behaviours/attitudes
      follow Up
      Study-specific
      result
      Some favorable findings for substance-use interventions
      effect Estimate
      Not pooled
      uncertainty
      Heterogeneous methods
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    2. name
      Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
      follow Up
      Study-specific
      result
      No clear between-condition benefit
      effect Estimate
      Not pooled
      uncertainty
      Only two programmes
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    finding
    Some substance-use programmes showed promising behaviour changes; mental-health-focused programmes did not show significant between-condition effects despite within-group improvement.
    limitation
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    design
    type
    Systematic review
    randomization Evidence
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    masking
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    attrition
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    confounding
    Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
    adverse Findings
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    transfer Limits
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467
      type
      Europe PMC indexed publication metadata and abstract
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      PMID, DOI, title, journal and authors reconciled within the indexed source; full-text appraisal not claimed.
    2. url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063
      type
      Crossref publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:26:11.976262+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      DOI and normalized title match the Europe PMC record. Bibliographic verification only; not a full-text review.
    publication Status
    status
    Published journal article
    correction Retraction Check
    Europe PMC publication types and Crossref relation/update metadata checked. No retraction indicator found in these records.
    uncertainty
    Metadata checks do not guarantee absence of all notices or later changes.
    recommendation Rationale
    Maps interventions for perpetrators with substance-use or mental-health problems without treating within-group improvement as comparative efficacy.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Abstract-level structured assessment; missing fields are explicit. Review evidence is not counted as additional independent trials.
    identity Verification
    status
    cross-source-verified
    fields

    DOI · title

    limitation
    Not recorded
    source Evidence Hashes
    crossref SHA256
    e05cfc6e3ce5e1e9ccc8bd7cd7e6a3f1a10a4ea9b87d92d9e02c23d6d2316c2b
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    review Ready
    true
    research Lane
    reviews-prevention
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    eedd52ef0e88bc43a8ce1b7494f14fa501cefaa8b6e9f64d2d7f3d20ca2dfc0b
    prior Revision
    r1-eedd52ef0e88
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-reviews-39180467
    doi
    10.1177/15248380241270063
    pmid
    39180467
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    c2061a0c38e01b6200a77000a69c2185208e6ecf80fd3ae213cf337a4c479799
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    review
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Evidence synthesis; not a participant-randomized experiment.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Evidence synthesis receives no trial-design crosses.
    sources

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F15248380241270063

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    providers
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    assessors
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    analysts
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
    exposure Evidence
    The accessed publication explicitly identifies male ipv perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems.
    rationale
    Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
    transfer Limit
    Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
    intervention
    description
    Psychological perpetrator programmes, commonly CBT or motivational interviewing
    dose
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    provider
    Not established from accessed abstract.
    comparator
    Varied controlled or pre/post comparisons
    outcomes
    1. name
      IPV behaviours/attitudes
      follow Up
      Study-specific
      result
      Some favorable findings for substance-use interventions
      effect Estimate
      Not pooled
      uncertainty
      Heterogeneous methods
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    2. name
      Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
      follow Up
      Study-specific
      result
      No clear between-condition benefit
      effect Estimate
      Not pooled
      uncertainty
      Only two programmes
      primary Status
      Not established from accessed abstract.
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    776b7b9996f8d354aa4e018ca196da92aaaece9248d1300471156d85f1b984bd
    revision
    audit-r2-776b7b9996f8
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    5
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Systematic review
intervention
Psychological perpetrator programmes, commonly CBT or motivational interviewing Not established from accessed abstract.
comparator
Varied controlled or pre/post comparisons
sample
23 studies covering13 interventions
measurement
IPV behaviours/attitudes; Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
timing
Study-specific
trial Id
relationship Note
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct. Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39180467 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39180467/

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:20.171273+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    IPV behaviours/attitudes
    follow Up
    Study-specific
    result
    Some favorable findings for substance-use interventions
    effect Estimate
    Not pooled
    uncertainty
    Heterogeneous methods
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
  2. name
    Mental-health-focused programme outcomes
    follow Up
    Study-specific
    result
    No clear between-condition benefit
    effect Estimate
    Not pooled
    uncertainty
    Only two programmes
    primary Status
    Not established from accessed abstract.
quality
risk Of Bias
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
attrition
Not established from accessed abstract.
confounding
Study-design heterogeneity, overlapping trials and review-specific eligibility limit pooling across reviews.
adverse Findings
Not established from accessed abstract.
transfer Limits
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
Not established from accessed abstract.
providers
Not established from accessed abstract.
assessors
Not established from accessed abstract.
analysts
Not established from accessed abstract.
population
relation
direct
population
Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
exposure Evidence
The accessed publication explicitly identifies male ipv perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems.
rationale
Direct evidence concerning therapeutic or psychosocial responses to IPV, with survivor and perpetrator findings kept distinct.
transfer Limit
Methodological shortcomings and only two mental-health-specific interventions limit conclusions; within-group symptom reductions do not demonstrate comparative efficacy.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    substance-use
    evidence
    1. field
      title
      text
      The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
      matched Text
      Substance
    2. field
      population
      text
      Male IPV perpetrators with substance-use and/or mental-health problems
      matched Text
      substance
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
conditions

substance-use

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library