Evaluation of Integrative Community Therapy with Domestic Violence Survivors in Quito, Ecuador.
Chiara Sabina; Diego Perez-Figueroa; Laurent Reyes; Eduardo Campaña Medina; Eluzinete Pereira de Souza; Lisa Markovits; Andrea Carolina Oña Jacho; Gissel Katherine Rojas Bohorquez · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023 · Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Health, social support and self-esteem improved more in intervention; resilience and dating-violence-attitude interactions were nonsignificant.
Recorded limitations
Self-selection, baseline imbalances, attrition and unequal incentives limit causal inference.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- assessment
- category
- nonrandomized-or-unestablished
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- trust Factor
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- intervention
- One thematic music workshop plus five integrative community-therapy circles. Six weekly 90-minute online meetings.
- comparator
- No-contact comparison between pre/post assessments; services available.
- sample
- 130 recruited (75/55); 87 completed (49/38); focus group 21.
- measurement
- General health; Social support; Self-esteem; Resilience; Dating-violence attitudes
- timing
- Six weeks
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research. Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- General health
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.19
- p
- <0.001
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Social support
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.09
- p
- 0.01
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Self-esteem
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement; borderline significance.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.05
- p
- 0.05 in table; <0.05 in narrative
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Resilience
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.62
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Dating-violence attitudes
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.09
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
- attrition
- 43/130 did not complete both surveys (26/75 intervention; 17/55 comparison).
- confounding
- Baseline violence/service-use differences were not adjusted; music not isolated.
- adverse Findings
- Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
- transfer Limits
- Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Women with prior domestic violence in Quito.
- exposure Evidence
- Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
- rationale
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
- transfer Limit
- Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- sound:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- sound
- trust Score
- 1
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- dv-sound-37107774
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- sound
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-980f16a4158e
- source Content Hash
- 980f16a4158e54412bb1c50f35cb8e7b211d618fd4e066f7e8439d4fc13cbfe4
- source Access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 833c8a81055cbcd7f56ded118ba9746c4e55973f98d7cf7b6a7ea4dc60ee965d
- prior Revision
- r1-833c8a81055c
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-sound-37107774
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 7d3199eae250707eb9360e806dc19852d314340c0c3337b23fa033748b1d7e0d
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Family Id
- paper-2f5d7ff09d24
- family Linkage Uncertain
- true
- approaches
music
- id
- dv-sound-37107774
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Evaluation of Integrative Community Therapy with Domestic Violence Survivors in Quito, Ecuador.
- journal
- International journal of environmental research and public health
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2023
- authors
- Chiara Sabina; Diego Perez-Figueroa; Laurent Reyes; Eduardo Campaña Medina; Eluzinete Pereira de Souza; Lisa Markovits; Andrea Carolina Oña Jacho; Gissel Katherine Rojas Bohorquez
- design
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- urls
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085492 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37107774/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- collections
sound
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Health, social support and self-esteem improved more in intervention; resilience and dating-violence-attitude interactions were nonsignificant.
- limitation
- Self-selection, baseline imbalances, attrition and unequal incentives limit causal inference.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- nonrandomized-or-unestablished
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- citations By Collection
- sound
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- sound:domestic-family-violence
- title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- collection
- sound
- trust Score
- 1
- journal Key
- internationaljournalofenvironmentalresearchandpublichealth
- journal Label
- International journal of environmental research and public health
- chapter Entries
- id
- sound-dv-dv-sound-37107774
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Evaluation of Integrative Community Therapy with Domestic Violence Survivors in Quito, Ecuador.
- authors
- Chiara Sabina; Diego Perez-Figueroa; Laurent Reyes; Eduardo Campaña Medina; Eluzinete Pereira de Souza; Lisa Markovits; Andrea Carolina Oña Jacho; Gissel Katherine Rojas Bohorquez
- year
- 2023
- journal
- International journal of environmental research and public health
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- urls
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085492 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37107774/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- collections
sound
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
adults
- age Population
- record Id
- dv-sound-37107774
- collections
sound
- groups
adults
- reported Ages
- 19–29, 30–39 and 40+ categories; age available for 64.
- youth Scope
- Not recorded
- youth Source Note
- No separately reported youth sample.
- source URL
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/
- basis Type
- source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Original age terms: adult. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
- community Matches
- category Id
- domestic-violence
- relation
- direct
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- origin
- approved-dv-20261101
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Health, social support and self-esteem improved more in intervention; resilience and dating-violence-attitude interactions were nonsignificant.
- summary
- Health, social support and self-esteem improved more in intervention; resilience and dating-violence-attitude interactions were nonsignificant.
- limitation
- Self-selection, baseline imbalances, attrition and unequal incentives limit causal inference.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- intervention
- One thematic music workshop plus five integrative community-therapy circles. Six weekly 90-minute online meetings.
- comparator
- No-contact comparison between pre/post assessments; services available.
- sample
- 130 recruited (75/55); 87 completed (49/38); focus group 21.
- measurement
- General health; Social support; Self-esteem; Resilience; Dating-violence attitudes
- timing
- Six weeks
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research. Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- General health
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.19
- p
- <0.001
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Social support
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.09
- p
- 0.01
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Self-esteem
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement; borderline significance.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.05
- p
- 0.05 in table; <0.05 in narrative
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Resilience
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.62
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Dating-violence attitudes
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.09
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
- attrition
- 43/130 did not complete both surveys (26/75 intervention; 17/55 comparison).
- confounding
- Baseline violence/service-use differences were not adjusted; music not isolated.
- adverse Findings
- Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
- transfer Limits
- Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Women with prior domestic violence in Quito.
- exposure Evidence
- Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
- rationale
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
- transfer Limit
- Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- nonrandomized-or-unestablished
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 1
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-01
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
- source Revision
- audit-r2-980f16a4158e
- source Content Hash
- 980f16a4158e54412bb1c50f35cb8e7b211d618fd4e066f7e8439d4fc13cbfe4
- source Access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- study Family Id
- paper-2f5d7ff09d24
- family Linkage Uncertain
- true
- approaches
music
- record Id
- dv-sound-37107774
- source Pages
- None recorded
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 833c8a81055cbcd7f56ded118ba9746c4e55973f98d7cf7b6a7ea4dc60ee965d
- prior Revision
- r1-833c8a81055c
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-sound-37107774
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 7d3199eae250707eb9360e806dc19852d314340c0c3337b23fa033748b1d7e0d
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- assessment Record
- id
- dv-sound-37107774
- title
- Evaluation of Integrative Community Therapy with Domestic Violence Survivors in Quito, Ecuador.
- authors
Chiara Sabina · Diego Perez-Figueroa · Laurent Reyes · Eduardo Campaña Medina · Eluzinete Pereira de Souza · Lisa Markovits · Andrea Carolina Oña Jacho · Gissel Katherine Rojas Bohorquez
- year
- 2023
- journal
- International journal of environmental research and public health
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- trial Registration
- None recorded
- collection
- sound
- intervention Family
- community therapy with music workshop
- publication Type
- nonrandomized comparative primary study
- study Family Id
- paper-2f5d7ff09d24
- family Linkage Uncertain
- true
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- relevance
- relation
- direct
- population
- Women with prior domestic violence in Quito.
- exposure Evidence
- Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
- rationale
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
- transfer Limit
- Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- age
- groups
adult
- reported Range
- 19–29, 30–39 and 40+ categories; age available for 64.
- youth Scope
- No separately reported youth sample.
- country
- Ecuador
- setting
- Quito; online during 2021
- sample Size
- randomized
- Not recorded
- analyzed
- 87
- description
- 130 recruited (75/55); 87 completed (49/38); focus group 21.
- intervention
- description
- One thematic music workshop plus five integrative community-therapy circles.
- dose
- Six weekly 90-minute online meetings.
- provider
- Certified community-therapy facilitators
- comparator
- No-contact comparison between pre/post assessments; services available.
- outcomes
- name
- General health
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.19
- p
- <0.001
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Social support
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.09
- p
- 0.01
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Self-esteem
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement; borderline significance.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.05
- p
- 0.05 in table; <0.05 in narrative
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Resilience
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.62
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Dating-violence attitudes
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.09
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- finding
- Health, social support and self-esteem improved more in intervention; resilience and dating-violence-attitude interactions were nonsignificant.
- limitation
- Self-selection, baseline imbalances, attrition and unequal incentives limit causal inference.
- design
- type
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- randomization Evidence
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- masking
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- crosses
- 0
- cross Rationale
- No verified randomized allocation; no RCT crosses.
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
- attrition
- 43/130 did not complete both surveys (26/75 intervention; 17/55 comparison).
- confounding
- Baseline violence/service-use differences were not adjusted; music not isolated.
- adverse Findings
- Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
- transfer Limits
- Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
- jadad
- not applicable
- access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- sources
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/
- type
- open-access original full text
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- Complete PMC XML accessed through Europe PMC; methods, results, discussion and limitations inspected.
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- type
- publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- identity Verified
- true
- notes
- Identity and update metadata checked; not used as evidence of treatment benefit.
- publication Status
- status
- published
- correction Retraction Check
- No update-to correction/retraction entry in retrieved Crossref metadata.
- uncertainty
- This limited metadata check is not an exhaustive status audit.
- recommendation Rationale
- Retain as clearly labeled exploratory evidence for human review.
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- assessment Status
- assessed
- assessment Notes
- Multicomponent intervention; cannot attribute changes to music alone. Full-text comparison qualified by nonrandomization.
- research Lane
- sound
- review Ready
- true
- review Readiness
- ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
- publication Recommendation
- status
- recommended-summary
- reason
- Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
- scope
- Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
- human Release Approval
- false
- editorial Audit
- auditor
- Codex (AI)
- completed At
- 2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
- prior Content Hash
- 833c8a81055cbcd7f56ded118ba9746c4e55973f98d7cf7b6a7ea4dc60ee965d
- prior Revision
- r1-833c8a81055c
- prior Source
- frozen-120
- source Verification
- id
- dv-sound-37107774
- doi
- 10.3390/ijerph20085492
- pmid
- 37107774
- fresh Metadata
- Europe PMC core
- metadata Retrieved
- true
- metadata SHA256
- 7d3199eae250707eb9360e806dc19852d314340c0c3337b23fa033748b1d7e0d
- claim Check
- Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- applied Proposals
- None recorded
- method
- AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
- limitations
Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.
- study Design Assessment
- category
- nonrandomized-or-unestablished
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- basis
- Authors explicitly state allocation was not randomized; participants selected by availability/interest and capacity.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- paper Trust Assessment
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- score
- 1
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- basis
- No verified randomized allocation; no RCT crosses.
- sources
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- review Scope
- full-text
- human Approval
- false
- display Crosses
- 0
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Women with prior domestic violence in Quito.
- exposure Evidence
- Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
- rationale
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
- transfer Limit
- Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- intervention
- description
- One thematic music workshop plus five integrative community-therapy circles.
- dose
- Six weekly 90-minute online meetings.
- provider
- Certified community-therapy facilitators
- comparator
- No-contact comparison between pre/post assessments; services available.
- outcomes
- name
- General health
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.19
- p
- <0.001
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Social support
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.09
- p
- 0.01
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Self-esteem
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement; borderline significance.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.05
- p
- 0.05 in table; <0.05 in narrative
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Resilience
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.62
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Dating-violence attitudes
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.09
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- provenance
- Discovered by AI
- content Hash
- 980f16a4158e54412bb1c50f35cb8e7b211d618fd4e066f7e8439d4fc13cbfe4
- revision
- audit-r2-980f16a4158e
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- sound
- chapter Number
- 7
- topic Id
- domestic-family-violence
- topic Title
- Domestic & Family Violence
- trust Score
- 1
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Self-selected pre/post comparison-group study
- intervention
- One thematic music workshop plus five integrative community-therapy circles. Six weekly 90-minute online meetings.
- comparator
- No-contact comparison between pre/post assessments; services available.
- sample
- 130 recruited (75/55); 87 completed (49/38); focus group 21.
- measurement
- General health; Social support; Self-esteem; Resilience; Dating-violence attitudes
- timing
- Six weeks
- trial Id
- relationship Note
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research. Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- source Access
- level
- full-text
- source URLs
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138899/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3390/ijerph20085492
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
- outcomes
- name
- General health
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.19
- p
- <0.001
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Social support
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.09
- p
- 0.01
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Self-esteem
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- Group-by-time improvement; borderline significance.
- effect Estimate
- partial Eta Squared
- 0.05
- p
- 0.05 in table; <0.05 in narrative
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Resilience
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.62
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- name
- Dating-violence attitudes
- follow Up
- Six weeks
- result
- No significant group-by-time interaction.
- effect Estimate
- p
- 0.09
- uncertainty
- No randomized causal effect established.
- primary Status
- not established from accessed source
- quality
- risk Of Bias
- Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
- attrition
- 43/130 did not complete both surveys (26/75 intervention; 17/55 comparison).
- confounding
- Baseline violence/service-use differences were not adjusted; music not isolated.
- adverse Findings
- Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
- transfer Limits
- Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
- jadad
- not applicable
- masking Roles
- participants
- not established from accessed source
- providers
- not established from accessed source
- assessors
- not established from accessed source
- analysts
- not established from accessed source
- population
- relation
- direct
- population
- Women with prior domestic violence in Quito.
- exposure Evidence
- Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
- rationale
- Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
- transfer Limit
- Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
1
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false