Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Music, Emotions, and Relationships: Professionals’ Experiences of the Feasibility of a Music Group Intervention for Children in Shelters After Exposure to Domestic Violence

Karin Pernebo; Rebecka Orsmark; Sebastian Rolkert; Johan Melander Hagborg · Journal of Family Violence · 2026 · Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.

Recorded limitations

No direct child clinical outcome assessment.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
basis
No random allocation established.
sources

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

review Scope
selected-methods
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
No random allocation established.
sources

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
intervention
Singing, instruments and movement with creative activities. Six 90-minute sessions including 45 minutes of music.
comparator
No concurrent untreated comparator established.
sample
Fourteen professionals; approximately 50 children attended, not an outcome sample.
measurement
Implementation feasibility
timing
not established from accessed source
trial Id
relationship Note
Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research. Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Implementation feasibility
    follow Up
    not established from accessed source
    result
    Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    No causal treatment effect established.
    primary Status
    not established from accessed source
quality
risk Of Bias
Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
attrition
14 of 16 invited professionals interviewed.
confounding
Programme staff reported perceptions; researcher involvement may influence interpretation.
adverse Findings
Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
transfer Limits
Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
population
relation
context
population
Professionals delivering music groups to DV-exposed children in shelters.
exposure Evidence
Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
rationale
Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
transfer Limit
Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    sound:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    sound
    trust Score
    1
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-sound-efa9f1420011
doi
10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
pmid
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
sound
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-5072833aed7b
source Content Hash
5072833aed7bb665055d32ceb1a140a84c0c2ba5bf6d4b39bbef3027c1f5873f
source Access
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
bc33c7e3b426abe5a1ec2172cf34b8252fc62d4f1b422f768c758b2f5fe84086
prior Revision
r1-bc33c7e3b426
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-sound-efa9f1420011
doi
10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
pmid
Not recorded
fresh Metadata
Crossref
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
b04e285724acb1fe89c8eaebe2e60fac583c7ead4fe65c82a42fa2da6ea70b75
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
paper-efa9f1420011
family Linkage Uncertain
true
approaches

music

id
dv-sound-efa9f1420011
aliases
None recorded
title
Music, Emotions, and Relationships: Professionals’ Experiences of the Feasibility of a Music Group Intervention for Children in Shelters After Exposure to Domestic Violence
journal
Journal of Family Violence
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2026
authors
Karin Pernebo; Rebecka Orsmark; Sebastian Rolkert; Johan Melander Hagborg
design
Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
pmid
Not recorded
urls

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

collections

sound

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
limitation
No direct child clinical outcome assessment.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
basis
No random allocation established.
sources

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

review Scope
selected-methods
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
Not recorded
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
No random allocation established.
sources

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
sound
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    sound:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    sound
    trust Score
    1
journal Key
journaloffamilyviolence
journal Label
Journal of Family Violence
chapter Entries
  1. id
    sound-dv-dv-sound-efa9f1420011
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Music, Emotions, and Relationships: Professionals’ Experiences of the Feasibility of a Music Group Intervention for Children in Shelters After Exposure to Domestic Violence
    authors
    Karin Pernebo; Rebecka Orsmark; Sebastian Rolkert; Johan Melander Hagborg
    year
    2026
    journal
    Journal of Family Violence
    doi
    10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
    pmid
    Not recorded
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    collections

    sound

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    adults

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-sound-efa9f1420011
    collections

    sound

    groups

    adults

    reported Ages
    Target children 3–10; respondent ages not established from accessed source
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    Child programme; professional respondents.
    source URL
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: adult professional respondents, children as programme target. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      context
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
    summary
    Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
    limitation
    No direct child clinical outcome assessment.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
    intervention
    Singing, instruments and movement with creative activities. Six 90-minute sessions including 45 minutes of music.
    comparator
    No concurrent untreated comparator established.
    sample
    Fourteen professionals; approximately 50 children attended, not an outcome sample.
    measurement
    Implementation feasibility
    timing
    not established from accessed source
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research. Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Implementation feasibility
      follow Up
      not established from accessed source
      result
      Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      No causal treatment effect established.
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
    attrition
    14 of 16 invited professionals interviewed.
    confounding
    Programme staff reported perceptions; researcher involvement may influence interpretation.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
    transfer Limits
    Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    population
    relation
    context
    population
    Professionals delivering music groups to DV-exposed children in shelters.
    exposure Evidence
    Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
    rationale
    Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
    transfer Limit
    Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    basis
    No random allocation established.
    sources

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    No random allocation established.
    sources

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-5072833aed7b
    source Content Hash
    5072833aed7bb665055d32ceb1a140a84c0c2ba5bf6d4b39bbef3027c1f5873f
    source Access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
    study Family Id
    paper-efa9f1420011
    family Linkage Uncertain
    true
    approaches

    music

    record Id
    dv-sound-efa9f1420011
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    bc33c7e3b426abe5a1ec2172cf34b8252fc62d4f1b422f768c758b2f5fe84086
    prior Revision
    r1-bc33c7e3b426
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-sound-efa9f1420011
    doi
    10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
    pmid
    Not recorded
    fresh Metadata
    Crossref
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    b04e285724acb1fe89c8eaebe2e60fac583c7ead4fe65c82a42fa2da6ea70b75
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-sound-efa9f1420011
    title
    Music, Emotions, and Relationships: Professionals’ Experiences of the Feasibility of a Music Group Intervention for Children in Shelters After Exposure to Domestic Violence
    authors

    Karin Pernebo · Rebecka Orsmark · Sebastian Rolkert · Johan Melander Hagborg

    year
    2026
    journal
    Journal of Family Violence
    doi
    10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
    pmid
    Not recorded
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    sound
    intervention Family
    shelter-based group music
    publication Type
    qualitative feasibility study
    study Family Id
    paper-efa9f1420011
    family Linkage Uncertain
    true
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    context
    population
    Professionals delivering music groups to DV-exposed children in shelters.
    exposure Evidence
    Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
    rationale
    Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
    transfer Limit
    Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
    age
    groups

    adult professional respondents · children as programme target

    reported Range
    Target children 3–10; respondent ages not established from accessed source
    youth Scope
    Child programme; professional respondents.
    country
    Sweden
    setting
    Three shelters
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    14
    description
    Fourteen professionals; approximately 50 children attended, not an outcome sample.
    intervention
    description
    Singing, instruments and movement with creative activities.
    dose
    Six 90-minute sessions including 45 minutes of music.
    provider
    Musicians, music therapist and shelter staff
    comparator
    No concurrent untreated comparator established.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Implementation feasibility
      follow Up
      not established from accessed source
      result
      Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      No causal treatment effect established.
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    finding
    Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
    limitation
    No direct child clinical outcome assessment.
    design
    type
    Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
    randomization Evidence
    No random allocation established.
    masking
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    No verified randomized allocation; no RCT crosses.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
    attrition
    14 of 16 invited professionals interviewed.
    confounding
    Programme staff reported perceptions; researcher involvement may influence interpretation.
    adverse Findings
    Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
    transfer Limits
    Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
      type
      publisher full article; methods and results inspected
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Original publication evidence; extraction limited to accessed material.
    2. url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
      type
      publisher-deposited bibliographic metadata
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Identity and update metadata checked; not used as evidence of treatment benefit.
    publication Status
    status
    published
    correction Retraction Check
    No update-to correction/retraction entry in retrieved Crossref metadata.
    uncertainty
    This limited metadata check is not an exhaustive status audit.
    recommendation Rationale
    Retain as clearly labeled exploratory evidence for human review.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes
    Methods/results and selected discussion inspected. Child attendance is not a clinical response denominator.
    research Lane
    sound
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    bc33c7e3b426abe5a1ec2172cf34b8252fc62d4f1b422f768c758b2f5fe84086
    prior Revision
    r1-bc33c7e3b426
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-sound-efa9f1420011
    doi
    10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x
    pmid
    Not recorded
    fresh Metadata
    Crossref
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    b04e285724acb1fe89c8eaebe2e60fac583c7ead4fe65c82a42fa2da6ea70b75
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    basis
    No random allocation established.
    sources

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    Not recorded
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    No verified randomized allocation; no RCT crosses.
    sources

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    context
    population
    Professionals delivering music groups to DV-exposed children in shelters.
    exposure Evidence
    Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
    rationale
    Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
    transfer Limit
    Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
    intervention
    description
    Singing, instruments and movement with creative activities.
    dose
    Six 90-minute sessions including 45 minutes of music.
    provider
    Musicians, music therapist and shelter staff
    comparator
    No concurrent untreated comparator established.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Implementation feasibility
      follow Up
      not established from accessed source
      result
      Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
      effect Estimate
      Not recorded
      uncertainty
      No causal treatment effect established.
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    access
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    5072833aed7bb665055d32ceb1a140a84c0c2ba5bf6d4b39bbef3027c1f5873f
    revision
    audit-r2-5072833aed7b
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    sound
    chapter Number
    7
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    1
evidence
evidence Type
Professional interviews; reflexive thematic analysis
intervention
Singing, instruments and movement with creative activities. Six 90-minute sessions including 45 minutes of music.
comparator
No concurrent untreated comparator established.
sample
Fourteen professionals; approximately 50 children attended, not an outcome sample.
measurement
Implementation feasibility
timing
not established from accessed source
trial Id
relationship Note
Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research. Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007/s10896-026-01179-x

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:25:34.851078+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Implementation feasibility
    follow Up
    not established from accessed source
    result
    Professionals considered delivery feasible given safety, collaboration and adequate resources.
    effect Estimate
    Not recorded
    uncertainty
    No causal treatment effect established.
    primary Status
    not established from accessed source
quality
risk Of Bias
Exploratory evidence; selection, expectancy and reporting biases remain.
attrition
14 of 16 invited professionals interviewed.
confounding
Programme staff reported perceptions; researcher involvement may influence interpretation.
adverse Findings
Adverse-event assessment not established from accessed source.
transfer Limits
Sample and design do not support general clinical efficacy claims.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
population
relation
context
population
Professionals delivering music groups to DV-exposed children in shelters.
exposure Evidence
Explicit domestic/family/intimate-partner violence population in the original publication.
rationale
Directly relevant population and sound-based intervention or participatory music research.
transfer Limit
Findings do not establish general clinical efficacy or replacement of survivor services.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

1

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library