Universal Informatics · Research reading room

The relative effectiveness of EMDR versus relaxation training with battered women prisoners.

Sharman D. Colosetti; Bruce A. Thyer · Behavior Modification · 2000 · Repeated-measures case series

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Four of five women showed no additional improvement after EMDR; one improved in anxiety and intrusive thoughts.

Recorded limitations

Five cases and fixed treatment order cannot establish comparative efficacy or general ineffectiveness.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Repeated-measures case series
assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

review Scope
abstract
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Repeated-measures case series
intervention
Clinical EMDR Relaxation phase followed by EMDR; session count not established.
comparator
Earlier relaxation-training phase in the same participants; no randomized concurrent control.
sample
Five women; single-case A–B–C sequence.
measurement
Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
timing
post-treatment
trial Id
relationship Note
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population. Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
    follow Up
    post-treatment
    result
    Relaxation produced no clinical improvement; EMDR added improvement for one of five participants.
    effect Estimate
    not established from accessed source
    uncertainty
    not established from accessed source
    primary Status
    not established from accessed source
quality
risk Of Bias
Very small sequential case series.
attrition
not established from accessed source
confounding
Order, time and prison context cannot be separated from treatment.
adverse Findings
not established from accessed source
transfer Limits
Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
population
relation
direct
population
Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
exposure Evidence
Abstract explicitly describes five women prisoners with a history of battering and DSM-IV PTSD.
rationale
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
transfer Limit
Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    vision:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-vision-11036736
doi
10.1177/0145445500245006
pmid
11036736
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
vision
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-aba355b87ce5
source Content Hash
aba355b87ce5caf6a3957fe0f69c680f219d3b8515efcd242a7249b452ee94db
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
1e5bef7cc2779c8fc5277edffe0fb958d3929cb349dddb35144b9b27db29d88c
prior Revision
r1-1e5bef7cc277
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-vision-11036736
doi
10.1177/0145445500245006
pmid
11036736
fresh Metadata
Europe PMC core
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
8a256ee9a3c278f73939ae39659a9e9c973a32ae8b81086b27d95be7b52fa028
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
paper-11036736
family Linkage Uncertain
true
approaches

emdr

id
dv-vision-11036736
aliases
None recorded
title
The relative effectiveness of EMDR versus relaxation training with battered women prisoners.
journal
Behavior Modification
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2000
authors
Sharman D. Colosetti; Bruce A. Thyer
design
Repeated-measures case series
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1177/0145445500245006
pmid
11036736
urls

https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

collections

vision

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Four of five women showed no additional improvement after EMDR; one improved in anxiety and intrusive thoughts.
limitation
Five cases and fixed treatment order cannot establish comparative efficacy or general ineffectiveness.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

review Scope
abstract
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

review Scope
abstract
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
vision
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    vision:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
behaviormodification
journal Label
Behavior Modification
chapter Entries
  1. id
    vision-dv-dv-vision-11036736
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    The relative effectiveness of EMDR versus relaxation training with battered women prisoners.
    authors
    Sharman D. Colosetti; Bruce A. Thyer
    year
    2000
    journal
    Behavior Modification
    doi
    10.1177/0145445500245006
    pmid
    11036736
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    collections

    vision

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    anxiety

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      anxiety
      evidence
      1. field
        outcomes
        text
        Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
        matched Text
        Anxiety
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    age Groups

    adults

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-vision-11036736
    collections

    vision

    groups

    adults

    reported Ages
    not established from accessed source
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    Not recorded
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Repeated-measures case series
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Four of five women showed no additional improvement after EMDR; one improved in anxiety and intrusive thoughts.
    summary
    Four of five women showed no additional improvement after EMDR; one improved in anxiety and intrusive thoughts.
    limitation
    Five cases and fixed treatment order cannot establish comparative efficacy or general ineffectiveness.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Repeated-measures case series
    intervention
    Clinical EMDR Relaxation phase followed by EMDR; session count not established.
    comparator
    Earlier relaxation-training phase in the same participants; no randomized concurrent control.
    sample
    Five women; single-case A–B–C sequence.
    measurement
    Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
    timing
    post-treatment
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population. Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
      follow Up
      post-treatment
      result
      Relaxation produced no clinical improvement; EMDR added improvement for one of five participants.
      effect Estimate
      not established from accessed source
      uncertainty
      not established from accessed source
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Very small sequential case series.
    attrition
    not established from accessed source
    confounding
    Order, time and prison context cannot be separated from treatment.
    adverse Findings
    not established from accessed source
    transfer Limits
    Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
    exposure Evidence
    Abstract explicitly describes five women prisoners with a history of battering and DSM-IV PTSD.
    rationale
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
    transfer Limit
    Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-aba355b87ce5
    source Content Hash
    aba355b87ce5caf6a3957fe0f69c680f219d3b8515efcd242a7249b452ee94db
    source Access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    study Family Id
    paper-11036736
    family Linkage Uncertain
    true
    approaches

    emdr

    record Id
    dv-vision-11036736
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    1e5bef7cc2779c8fc5277edffe0fb958d3929cb349dddb35144b9b27db29d88c
    prior Revision
    r1-1e5bef7cc277
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-vision-11036736
    doi
    10.1177/0145445500245006
    pmid
    11036736
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    8a256ee9a3c278f73939ae39659a9e9c973a32ae8b81086b27d95be7b52fa028
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-vision-11036736
    title
    The relative effectiveness of EMDR versus relaxation training with battered women prisoners.
    authors

    Sharman D. Colosetti · Bruce A. Thyer

    year
    2000
    journal
    Behavior Modification
    doi
    10.1177/0145445500245006
    pmid
    11036736
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    vision
    intervention Family
    Clinical EMDR
    publication Type
    primary study
    study Family Id
    paper-11036736
    family Linkage Uncertain
    true
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
    exposure Evidence
    Abstract explicitly describes five women prisoners with a history of battering and DSM-IV PTSD.
    rationale
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
    transfer Limit
    Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    age
    groups

    adults

    reported Range
    not established from accessed source
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    country
    not established from accessed source
    setting
    Prison
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    5
    description
    Five women; single-case A–B–C sequence.
    intervention
    description
    Clinical EMDR
    dose
    Relaxation phase followed by EMDR; session count not established.
    provider
    not established from accessed source
    comparator
    Earlier relaxation-training phase in the same participants; no randomized concurrent control.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
      follow Up
      post-treatment
      result
      Relaxation produced no clinical improvement; EMDR added improvement for one of five participants.
      effect Estimate
      not established from accessed source
      uncertainty
      not established from accessed source
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    finding
    Four of five women showed no additional improvement after EMDR; one improved in anxiety and intrusive thoughts.
    limitation
    Five cases and fixed treatment order cannot establish comparative efficacy or general ineffectiveness.
    design
    type
    Repeated-measures case series
    randomization Evidence
    Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
    masking
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    Randomized design and double masking are not established.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    Very small sequential case series.
    attrition
    not established from accessed source
    confounding
    Order, time and prison context cannot be separated from treatment.
    adverse Findings
    not established from accessed source
    transfer Limits
    Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/
      type
      bibliographic/primary abstract
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title, DOI and authors reconciled across primary abstract or publisher-deposited metadata.
    2. url
      https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006
      type
      bibliographic/primary abstract
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title, DOI and authors reconciled across primary abstract or publisher-deposited metadata.
    3. url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006
      type
      publisher-deposited Crossref status metadata
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:26:23.813928+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title/authors/DOI matched; update-to and relation fields checked.
    publication Status
    status
    published
    correction Retraction Check
    Crossref publisher-deposited update-to and relation fields were empty on 30 October 2026; no correction/retraction notice was identified in accessed metadata. This limited check cannot exclude unlinked notices. Europe PMC publication types and available correction/comment fields were also inspected; no retraction type or notice was present.
    uncertainty
    Publisher update links and future notices require checking before final approval.
    recommendation Rationale
    Preserves directly relevant negative findings rather than selecting only favorable EMDR studies.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes

    Clinical EMDR evidence concerns a therapist-delivered multicomponent treatment; it does not isolate eye movements or validate standalone audiovisual content.

    research Lane
    vision
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    1e5bef7cc2779c8fc5277edffe0fb958d3929cb349dddb35144b9b27db29d88c
    prior Revision
    r1-1e5bef7cc277
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-vision-11036736
    doi
    10.1177/0145445500245006
    pmid
    11036736
    fresh Metadata
    Europe PMC core
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    8a256ee9a3c278f73939ae39659a9e9c973a32ae8b81086b27d95be7b52fa028
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Sequential assessment, relaxation and EMDR phases; no random allocation described.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    review Scope
    abstract
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Randomized design and double masking are not established.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006 · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0145445500245006

    review Scope
    abstract
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
    exposure Evidence
    Abstract explicitly describes five women prisoners with a history of battering and DSM-IV PTSD.
    rationale
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
    transfer Limit
    Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    intervention
    description
    Clinical EMDR
    dose
    Relaxation phase followed by EMDR; session count not established.
    provider
    not established from accessed source
    comparator
    Earlier relaxation-training phase in the same participants; no randomized concurrent control.
    outcomes
    1. name
      Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
      follow Up
      post-treatment
      result
      Relaxation produced no clinical improvement; EMDR added improvement for one of five participants.
      effect Estimate
      not established from accessed source
      uncertainty
      not established from accessed source
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    access
    level
    abstract
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    aba355b87ce5caf6a3957fe0f69c680f219d3b8515efcd242a7249b452ee94db
    revision
    audit-r2-aba355b87ce5
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    7
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Repeated-measures case series
intervention
Clinical EMDR Relaxation phase followed by EMDR; session count not established.
comparator
Earlier relaxation-training phase in the same participants; no randomized concurrent control.
sample
Five women; single-case A–B–C sequence.
measurement
Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
timing
post-treatment
trial Id
relationship Note
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population. Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
abstract
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11036736/ · https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500245006

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
    follow Up
    post-treatment
    result
    Relaxation produced no clinical improvement; EMDR added improvement for one of five participants.
    effect Estimate
    not established from accessed source
    uncertainty
    not established from accessed source
    primary Status
    not established from accessed source
quality
risk Of Bias
Very small sequential case series.
attrition
not established from accessed source
confounding
Order, time and prison context cannot be separated from treatment.
adverse Findings
not established from accessed source
transfer Limits
Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
population
relation
direct
population
Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
exposure Evidence
Abstract explicitly describes five women prisoners with a history of battering and DSM-IV PTSD.
rationale
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
transfer Limit
Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    anxiety
    evidence
    1. field
      outcomes
      text
      Anxiety, avoidance and intrusive thoughts
      matched Text
      Anxiety
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
conditions

anxiety

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library