Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the treatment of victims of domestic violence: A pilot study

C. Tarquinio; M.-J. Brennstuhl; J.A. Rydberg; A. Schmitt; F. Mouda; M. Lourel; P. Tarquinio · Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée · 2012 · Nonrandomized controlled pilot

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

EMDR showed larger PTSD/anxiety reductions than eclectic therapy; both treated groups improved versus untreated controls, with gains reported at six months.

Recorded limitations

Self-selection, 12-person groups and restrictive trauma-history eligibility limit causal interpretation and generalization.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Nonrandomized controlled pilot
assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
sources

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

review Scope
full-text
trust Factor
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
sources

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

review Scope
full-text
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Nonrandomized controlled pilot
intervention
Clinical EMDR Five 60-minute sessions after two preliminary interviews.
comparator
Eclectic psychotherapy and women declining psychotherapy.
sample
12 EMDR, 12 eclectic therapy, 12 untreated controls; not randomized.
measurement
PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
timing
post-treatment and six months
trial Id
relationship Note
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population. Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
full-text
source URLs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
    follow Up
    post-treatment and six months
    result
    Reported improvements favor treatment; EMDR advantage mainly PTSD/anxiety.
    effect Estimate
    not established from accessed source
    uncertainty
    not established from accessed source
    primary Status
    not established from accessed source
quality
risk Of Bias
High selection and expectancy bias.
attrition
not established from accessed source
confounding
Treatment choice and refusal of therapy differ between groups.
adverse Findings
not established from accessed source
transfer Limits
Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
population
relation
direct
population
Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
exposure Evidence
Inclusion required recent physical partner violence, police complaint and PTSD.
rationale
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
transfer Limit
Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    vision:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
dv-vision-2a09962793c2
doi
10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
pmid
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
vision
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-01
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
source Revision
audit-r2-c93893176c84
source Content Hash
c93893176c840c8cb2a1064cc4d3027570c13a3970d23216057e7cecfb3cc917
source Access
level
full-text
source URLs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
editorial Audit
auditor
Codex (AI)
completed At
2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
prior Content Hash
abb46da5571bdee943681b7b5e6e0b4819f4b755d842a1d65c3694fc41886f37
prior Revision
r1-abb46da5571b
prior Source
frozen-120
source Verification
id
dv-vision-2a09962793c2
doi
10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
pmid
Not recorded
fresh Metadata
Crossref
metadata Retrieved
true
metadata SHA256
55ce93901a5547815bebcc99abd1890f47ced47505c648957181bff0e8d896b0
claim Check
Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
sources

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

applied Proposals
None recorded
method
AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
limitations

Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

study Family Id
paper-2a09962793c2
family Linkage Uncertain
true
approaches

emdr

id
dv-vision-2a09962793c2
aliases
None recorded
title
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the treatment of victims of domestic violence: A pilot study
journal
Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2012
authors
C. Tarquinio; M.-J. Brennstuhl; J.A. Rydberg; A. Schmitt; F. Mouda; M. Lourel; P. Tarquinio
design
Nonrandomized controlled pilot
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
pmid
Not recorded
urls

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

collections

vision

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
EMDR showed larger PTSD/anxiety reductions than eclectic therapy; both treated groups improved versus untreated controls, with gains reported at six months.
limitation
Self-selection, 12-person groups and restrictive trauma-history eligibility limit causal interpretation and generalization.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
nonrandomized-or-unestablished
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
basis
Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
sources

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

review Scope
full-text
paper Trust Assessment
scope
Paper
status
assessed
score
1
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
basis
Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
sources

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

review Scope
full-text
human Approval
false
display Crosses
1
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
citations By Collection
vision
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    vision:domestic-family-violence
    title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
revueeuropeennedepsychologieappliquee
journal Label
Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée
chapter Entries
  1. id
    vision-dv-dv-vision-2a09962793c2
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the treatment of victims of domestic violence: A pilot study
    authors
    C. Tarquinio; M.-J. Brennstuhl; J.A. Rydberg; A. Schmitt; F. Mouda; M. Lourel; P. Tarquinio
    year
    2012
    journal
    Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée
    doi
    10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
    pmid
    Not recorded
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    collections

    vision

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    anxiety · ptsd · depression

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      anxiety
      evidence
      1. field
        outcomes
        text
        PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
        matched Text
        anxiety
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    2. id
      ptsd
      evidence
      1. field
        outcomes
        text
        PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
        matched Text
        PTSD
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    3. id
      depression
      evidence
      1. field
        outcomes
        text
        PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
        matched Text
        depression
      scope
      Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
    age Groups

    adults

    age Population
    record Id
    dv-vision-2a09962793c2
    collections

    vision

    groups

    adults

    reported Ages
    18–60 years eligibility; group means 33, 34.4 and 35.6 years.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    youth Source Note
    Not recorded
    source URL
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
    basis Type
    source-limited-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Original age terms: adults. Programme targets or possible eligibility are not counted as observed ages.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      domestic-violence
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Nonrandomized controlled pilot
    origin
    approved-dv-20261101
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    EMDR showed larger PTSD/anxiety reductions than eclectic therapy; both treated groups improved versus untreated controls, with gains reported at six months.
    summary
    EMDR showed larger PTSD/anxiety reductions than eclectic therapy; both treated groups improved versus untreated controls, with gains reported at six months.
    limitation
    Self-selection, 12-person groups and restrictive trauma-history eligibility limit causal interpretation and generalization.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Nonrandomized controlled pilot
    intervention
    Clinical EMDR Five 60-minute sessions after two preliminary interviews.
    comparator
    Eclectic psychotherapy and women declining psychotherapy.
    sample
    12 EMDR, 12 eclectic therapy, 12 untreated controls; not randomized.
    measurement
    PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
    timing
    post-treatment and six months
    trial Id
    relationship Note
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population. Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    source Access
    level
    full-text
    source URLs

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    outcomes
    1. name
      PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
      follow Up
      post-treatment and six months
      result
      Reported improvements favor treatment; EMDR advantage mainly PTSD/anxiety.
      effect Estimate
      not established from accessed source
      uncertainty
      not established from accessed source
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    High selection and expectancy bias.
    attrition
    not established from accessed source
    confounding
    Treatment choice and refusal of therapy differ between groups.
    adverse Findings
    not established from accessed source
    transfer Limits
    Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
    jadad
    not applicable
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
    exposure Evidence
    Inclusion required recent physical partner violence, police complaint and PTSD.
    rationale
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
    transfer Limit
    Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
    sources

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    review Scope
    full-text
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
    sources

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    review Scope
    full-text
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    1
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-01
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Qualified research-library summaries. No professional clinical peer review or treatment recommendation is claimed.
    source Revision
    audit-r2-c93893176c84
    source Content Hash
    c93893176c840c8cb2a1064cc4d3027570c13a3970d23216057e7cecfb3cc917
    source Access
    level
    full-text
    source URLs

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    study Family Id
    paper-2a09962793c2
    family Linkage Uncertain
    true
    approaches

    emdr

    record Id
    dv-vision-2a09962793c2
    source Pages
    None recorded
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    abb46da5571bdee943681b7b5e6e0b4819f4b755d842a1d65c3694fc41886f37
    prior Revision
    r1-abb46da5571b
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-vision-2a09962793c2
    doi
    10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
    pmid
    Not recorded
    fresh Metadata
    Crossref
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    55ce93901a5547815bebcc99abd1890f47ced47505c648957181bff0e8d896b0
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    assessment Record
    id
    dv-vision-2a09962793c2
    title
    Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the treatment of victims of domestic violence: A pilot study
    authors

    C. Tarquinio · M.-J. Brennstuhl · J.A. Rydberg · A. Schmitt · F. Mouda · M. Lourel · P. Tarquinio

    year
    2012
    journal
    Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée
    doi
    10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
    pmid
    Not recorded
    trial Registration
    None recorded
    collection
    vision
    intervention Family
    Clinical EMDR
    publication Type
    primary study
    study Family Id
    paper-2a09962793c2
    family Linkage Uncertain
    true
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    relevance
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
    exposure Evidence
    Inclusion required recent physical partner violence, police complaint and PTSD.
    rationale
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
    transfer Limit
    Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    age
    groups

    adults

    reported Range
    18–60 years eligibility; group means 33, 34.4 and 35.6 years.
    youth Scope
    Not recorded
    country
    France
    setting
    Psychotherapy services; referrals from clinicians and victim organizations.
    sample Size
    randomized
    Not recorded
    analyzed
    36
    description
    12 EMDR, 12 eclectic therapy, 12 untreated controls; not randomized.
    intervention
    description
    Clinical EMDR
    dose
    Five 60-minute sessions after two preliminary interviews.
    provider
    Accredited psychotherapists with at least five years experience.
    comparator
    Eclectic psychotherapy and women declining psychotherapy.
    outcomes
    1. name
      PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
      follow Up
      post-treatment and six months
      result
      Reported improvements favor treatment; EMDR advantage mainly PTSD/anxiety.
      effect Estimate
      not established from accessed source
      uncertainty
      not established from accessed source
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    finding
    EMDR showed larger PTSD/anxiety reductions than eclectic therapy; both treated groups improved versus untreated controls, with gains reported at six months.
    limitation
    Self-selection, 12-person groups and restrictive trauma-history eligibility limit causal interpretation and generalization.
    design
    type
    Nonrandomized controlled pilot
    randomization Evidence
    Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
    masking
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    crosses
    0
    cross Rationale
    No cross: self-selected treatment groups.
    quality
    risk Of Bias
    High selection and expectancy bias.
    attrition
    not established from accessed source
    confounding
    Treatment choice and refusal of therapy differ between groups.
    adverse Findings
    not established from accessed source
    transfer Limits
    Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
    jadad
    not applicable
    access
    level
    full-text
    source URLs

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    sources
    1. url
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
      type
      bibliographic/primary abstract
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title, DOI and authors reconciled across primary abstract or publisher-deposited metadata.
    2. url
      https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf
      type
      primary full text
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Source directly inspected for the extracted claims.
    3. url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006
      type
      publisher-deposited Crossref status metadata
      retrieved At
      2026-10-30T07:26:25.761970+00:00
      identity Verified
      true
      notes
      Title/authors/DOI matched; update-to and relation fields checked.
    publication Status
    status
    published
    correction Retraction Check
    Crossref publisher-deposited update-to and relation fields were empty on 30 October 2026; no correction/retraction notice was identified in accessed metadata. This limited check cannot exclude unlinked notices.
    uncertainty
    Publisher update links and future notices require checking before final approval.
    recommendation Rationale
    Retain as pending evidence for human review, with design and source-access limits visible.
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    assessment Status
    assessed
    assessment Notes

    Clinical EMDR evidence concerns a therapist-delivered multicomponent treatment; it does not isolate eye movements or validate standalone audiovisual content.

    research Lane
    vision
    review Ready
    true
    review Readiness
    ai-editorial-audit-complete-release-pending
    publication Recommendation
    status
    recommended-summary
    reason
    Suitable as a qualified research-library summary at the stated source-access level. This is not a conclusion that the intervention is effective or safe.
    scope
    Research summary only; no treatment recommendation
    human Release Approval
    false
    editorial Audit
    auditor
    Codex (AI)
    completed At
    2026-10-31T05:11:05.655793+00:00
    prior Content Hash
    abb46da5571bdee943681b7b5e6e0b4819f4b755d842a1d65c3694fc41886f37
    prior Revision
    r1-abb46da5571b
    prior Source
    frozen-120
    source Verification
    id
    dv-vision-2a09962793c2
    doi
    10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006
    pmid
    Not recorded
    fresh Metadata
    Crossref
    metadata Retrieved
    true
    metadata SHA256
    55ce93901a5547815bebcc99abd1890f47ced47505c648957181bff0e8d896b0
    claim Check
    Headline finding/design/limitations compared with indexed abstract or accessible primary evidence; retained methods amendments separately adjudicated.
    sources

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    applied Proposals
    None recorded
    method
    AI editorial assessment of all 130 publication records: compare identity, headline finding, design, relevance and limitations with indexed abstracts or available primary material; adjudicate retained source-supported methods amendments. This is a source-limited publication audit, not an independent full-text systematic review or a clinical guideline.
    limitations

    Abstract-only records do not establish allocation concealment, complete harms reporting or full risk of bias. · No formal independent RoB 2, GRADE appraisal or numerical reconstruction of every effect was performed. · Source-access labels describe retained appraisal evidence; fuller prior appraisals were checked through their source ledgers and selected material, not independently repeated in full. · Publication counts are not independent trial or participant counts; cohort links and overlapping review evidence remain provisional. · A randomized design cross does not indicate benefit, low risk of bias or human approval. No double-blind trial is verified in this release. · No professional clinical peer review is claimed. Recommended content is limited to accurately qualified research summaries.

    study Design Assessment
    category
    nonrandomized-or-unestablished
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    basis
    Methods explicitly state randomization was not used; women chose treatment.
    sources

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    review Scope
    full-text
    paper Trust Assessment
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    score
    1
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    basis
    No cross: self-selected treatment groups.
    sources

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.erap.2012.08.006

    review Scope
    full-text
    human Approval
    false
    display Crosses
    0
    masking Roles
    participants
    not established from accessed source
    providers
    not established from accessed source
    assessors
    not established from accessed source
    analysts
    not established from accessed source
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    evidence
    population
    relation
    direct
    population
    Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
    exposure Evidence
    Inclusion required recent physical partner violence, police complaint and PTSD.
    rationale
    Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
    transfer Limit
    Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
    intervention
    description
    Clinical EMDR
    dose
    Five 60-minute sessions after two preliminary interviews.
    provider
    Accredited psychotherapists with at least five years experience.
    comparator
    Eclectic psychotherapy and women declining psychotherapy.
    outcomes
    1. name
      PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
      follow Up
      post-treatment and six months
      result
      Reported improvements favor treatment; EMDR advantage mainly PTSD/anxiety.
      effect Estimate
      not established from accessed source
      uncertainty
      not established from accessed source
      primary Status
      not established from accessed source
    access
    level
    full-text
    source URLs

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

    retrieved At
    2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    provenance
    Discovered by AI
    content Hash
    c93893176c840c8cb2a1064cc4d3027570c13a3970d23216057e7cecfb3cc917
    revision
    audit-r2-c93893176c84
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    7
    topic Id
    domestic-family-violence
    topic Title
    Domestic & Family Violence
    trust Score
    2
evidence
evidence Type
Nonrandomized controlled pilot
intervention
Clinical EMDR Five 60-minute sessions after two preliminary interviews.
comparator
Eclectic psychotherapy and women declining psychotherapy.
sample
12 EMDR, 12 eclectic therapy, 12 untreated controls; not randomized.
measurement
PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
timing
post-treatment and six months
trial Id
relationship Note
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population. Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
source Access
level
full-text
source URLs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.006 · https://www.efpe.fr/assets/4.-tarquinio---al.-(2012).-eye-movement-desensitization-and-reprocessing-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-victims....pdf

retrieved At
2026-10-30T07:22:28.727073+00:00
outcomes
  1. name
    PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
    follow Up
    post-treatment and six months
    result
    Reported improvements favor treatment; EMDR advantage mainly PTSD/anxiety.
    effect Estimate
    not established from accessed source
    uncertainty
    not established from accessed source
    primary Status
    not established from accessed source
quality
risk Of Bias
High selection and expectancy bias.
attrition
not established from accessed source
confounding
Treatment choice and refusal of therapy differ between groups.
adverse Findings
not established from accessed source
transfer Limits
Adult clinical samples do not establish benefit for children or violence prevention.
jadad
not applicable
masking Roles
participants
not established from accessed source
providers
not established from accessed source
assessors
not established from accessed source
analysts
not established from accessed source
population
relation
direct
population
Adult women exposed to domestic or intimate-partner violence
exposure Evidence
Inclusion required recent physical partner violence, police complaint and PTSD.
rationale
Directly relevant clinical EMDR evidence for the target population.
transfer Limit
Results do not establish effects on ongoing violence, safety or children.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    anxiety
    evidence
    1. field
      outcomes
      text
      PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
      matched Text
      anxiety
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
  2. id
    ptsd
    evidence
    1. field
      outcomes
      text
      PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
      matched Text
      PTSD
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
  3. id
    depression
    evidence
    1. field
      outcomes
      text
      PTSD/anxiety/depression scales
      matched Text
      depression
    scope
    Study population or investigated outcome; not a diagnosis or efficacy claim.
conditions

anxiety · ptsd · depression

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library