Virtual reality versus 2D biofeedback for children and adolescents with stress related disorders: a randomized controlled trial
Felnhofer Anna, Goinska Katharina, Hattinger Johann, Kamper Adrian, Lenz Andreas, Hlavacs Helmut, Kothgassner Oswald D. · Virtual Reality · 2025 · Randomised controlled study
Recorded summary
Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
Recorded limitations
A baseline heart-rate threshold guided feedback in both the 2D and VR training.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomised controlled study
- assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- trust Factor
- score
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- review Scope
- Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
- assessed At
- 2026-11-05
- display Crosses
- 2
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Participant study
- measurement
- Heart rate / heartbeat
- relationship Note
- A baseline heart-rate threshold guided feedback in both the 2D and VR training.
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:mindfulness-biofeedback
- title
- Mindfulness Biofeedback / AR / VR / Mixed Reality
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- lab-9993bb4e4e942d
- doi
- 10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- pmid
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- Not recorded
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- id
- lab-9993bb4e4e942d
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Virtual reality versus 2D biofeedback for children and adolescents with stress related disorders: a randomized controlled trial
- journal
- Virtual Reality
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Felnhofer Anna, Goinska Katharina, Hattinger Johann, Kamper Adrian, Lenz Andreas, Hlavacs Helmut, Kothgassner Oswald D.
- design
- Randomised controlled study
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- pmid
- Not recorded
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- collections
language
- categories
Mindfulness and biofeedback
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- limitation
- A baseline heart-rate threshold guided feedback in both the 2D and VR training.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- review Scope
- Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
- assessed At
- 2026-11-05
- display Crosses
- 2
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:mindfulness-biofeedback
- title
- Mindfulness Biofeedback / AR / VR / Mixed Reality
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- virtualreality
- journal Label
- Virtual Reality
- chapter Entries
- title
- Virtual reality versus 2D biofeedback for children and adolescents with stress related disorders: a randomized controlled trial
- doi
- 10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- pmid
- Not recorded
- journal
- Virtual Reality
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Felnhofer Anna, Goinska Katharina, Hattinger Johann, Kamper Adrian, Lenz Andreas, Hlavacs Helmut, Kothgassner Oswald D.
- design
- Randomised controlled study
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- targets
- None recorded
- categories
Mindfulness and biofeedback
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Participant study
- measurement
- Heart rate / heartbeat
- relationship Note
- A baseline heart-rate threshold guided feedback in both the 2D and VR training.
- id
- language-biofeedback-a01
- record Id
- lab-9993bb4e4e942d
- summary
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- limitation
- A baseline heart-rate threshold guided feedback in both the 2D and VR training.
- quotes
- None recorded
- source Pages
- None recorded
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Thirty-nine patients aged 9–18 received ten sessions of VR or conventional screen-based biofeedback. Both groups improved, with comparable outcomes through three months.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01123-2
- review Scope
- Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
- assessed At
- 2026-11-05
- display Crosses
- 2
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 2
- topic Id
- mindfulness-biofeedback
- topic Title
- Mindfulness Biofeedback / AR / VR / Mixed Reality
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Participant study
- measurement
- Heart rate / heartbeat
- relationship Note
- A baseline heart-rate threshold guided feedback in both the 2D and VR training.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false