Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Biophysical optimality of the golden angle in phyllotaxis

Takuya Okabe · Scientific Reports · 2015 · Mathematical and numerical model of plant development

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

An energy-cost model identifies the golden angle as an optimum for transitions between phyllotactic fractions and reproduces several common and less common leaf-arrangement sequences.

Recorded limitations

The proposed evolutionary explanation depends on the chosen transition-cost model. Agreement with known patterns does not measure the assumed energy costs or establish the genetic mechanism.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development
assessment
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
blinding
Not applicable to a clinical-trial grade
basis
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development. No human randomized controlled trial is reported.
sources

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358

category
peer-reviewed
peer Reviewed
true
trust Factor
score
1
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
false
blinding
not-confirmed
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development. No human randomized controlled trial is reported.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26471765/ · https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
reason
Not a human randomized controlled trial.
evidence
evidence Type
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development
evidence Class
proposed_biological_model
measurement
Phyllotactic fractions and divergence-angle cost function
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
relationship Note
Background literature only. This paper does not test or validate an OXTR–Fibonacci relationship.
clinical Evidence
false
review Depth
Abstract and selected source passages: Results; Discussion; Methods.
full Paper Appraisal
Not completed; review depth states the material assessed.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    general:fibonacci-biological-patterns
    title
    Biological patterns and developmental mechanisms
    collection
    general
    trust Score
    1
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
nature-fibonacci-srep15358
doi
10.1038/srep15358
pmid
26471765
citation Snapshot
count
31
source
Crossref cited-by count
retrieved At
2026-10-24
url
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038/srep15358
field
is-referenced-by-count
source Indexed At
2026-10-16T19:42:48Z
coverage Note
Count reflects Crossref-deposited references and can differ from publisher or other database totals. It is not a quality or clinical-evidence score.
citations By Collection
general
31
Complete approved library record
id
nature-fibonacci-srep15358
aliases
None recorded
title
Biophysical optimality of the golden angle in phyllotaxis
journal
Scientific Reports
publisher Family
nature
publisher Family Label
Nature Portfolio
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2015
authors
Takuya Okabe
design
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1038/srep15358
pmid
26471765
urls

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358 · https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15358 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26471765/

collections

general

categories

Fibonacci mathematics · Biological pattern formation

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
An energy-cost model identifies the golden angle as an optimum for transitions between phyllotactic fractions and reproduces several common and less common leaf-arrangement sequences.
limitation
The proposed evolutionary explanation depends on the chosen transition-cost model. Agreement with known patterns does not measure the assumed energy costs or establish the genetic mechanism.
citation Count
31
citation Snapshot
count
31
source
Crossref cited-by count
retrieved At
2026-10-24
url
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038/srep15358
field
is-referenced-by-count
source Indexed At
2026-10-16T19:42:48Z
coverage Note
Count reflects Crossref-deposited references and can differ from publisher or other database totals. It is not a quality or clinical-evidence score.
study Design Assessment
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
blinding
Not applicable to a clinical-trial grade
basis
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development. No human randomized controlled trial is reported.
sources

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358

category
peer-reviewed
peer Reviewed
true
paper Trust Assessment
score
1
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
false
blinding
not-confirmed
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development. No human randomized controlled trial is reported.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26471765/ · https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
citations By Collection
general
31
topics
  1. key
    general:fibonacci-biological-patterns
    title
    Biological patterns and developmental mechanisms
    collection
    general
    trust Score
    1
journal Key
scientificreports
journal Label
Scientific Reports
chapter Entries
  1. id
    general-nature-fibonacci-srep15358
    title
    Biophysical optimality of the golden angle in phyllotaxis
    journal
    Scientific Reports
    year
    2015
    authors
    Takuya Okabe
    doi
    10.1038/srep15358
    pmid
    26471765
    urls

    https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358 · https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15358 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26471765/

    design
    Mathematical and numerical model of plant development
    summary
    An energy-cost model identifies the golden angle as an optimum for transitions between phyllotactic fractions and reproduces several common and less common leaf-arrangement sequences.
    limitation
    The proposed evolutionary explanation depends on the chosen transition-cost model. Agreement with known patterns does not measure the assumed energy costs or establish the genetic mechanism.
    citation Count
    31
    citation Snapshot
    count
    31
    source
    Crossref cited-by count
    retrieved At
    2026-10-24
    url
    https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038/srep15358
    field
    is-referenced-by-count
    source Indexed At
    2026-10-16T19:42:48Z
    coverage Note
    Count reflects Crossref-deposited references and can differ from publisher or other database totals. It is not a quality or clinical-evidence score.
    categories

    Fibonacci mathematics · Biological pattern formation

    targets
    None recorded
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Mathematical and numerical model of plant development
    evidence Class
    proposed_biological_model
    measurement
    Phyllotactic fractions and divergence-angle cost function
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    relationship Note
    Background literature only. This paper does not test or validate an OXTR–Fibonacci relationship.
    clinical Evidence
    false
    review Depth
    Abstract and selected source passages: Results; Discussion; Methods.
    full Paper Appraisal
    Not completed; review depth states the material assessed.
    record Id
    nature-fibonacci-srep15358
    quotes
    None recorded
    source Pages
    None recorded
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    1
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Mathematical and numerical model of plant development. No human randomized controlled trial is reported.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26471765/ · https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358

    review Scope
    Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
    assessed At
    2026-10-27
    study Design Assessment
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    blinding
    Not applicable to a clinical-trial grade
    basis
    Mathematical and numerical model of plant development. No human randomized controlled trial is reported.
    sources

    https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358

    category
    peer-reviewed
    peer Reviewed
    true
    collection
    general
    chapter Number
    9
    topic Id
    fibonacci-biological-patterns
    topic Title
    Biological patterns and developmental mechanisms
    trust Score
    1
evidence
evidence Type
Mathematical and numerical model of plant development
evidence Class
proposed_biological_model
measurement
Phyllotactic fractions and divergence-angle cost function
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
relationship Note
Background literature only. This paper does not test or validate an OXTR–Fibonacci relationship.
clinical Evidence
false
review Depth
Abstract and selected source passages: Results; Discussion; Methods.
full Paper Appraisal
Not completed; review depth states the material assessed.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
reason
Not a human randomized controlled trial.
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

1

full Text
status
open-license
retrieval Available
true
url
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358
rights
license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
authors
Takuya, Okabe
title
Biophysical optimality of the golden angle in phyllotaxis
doi
10.1038/srep15358
copyright
2015 The Author(s)
source
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15358
transformation
Article sections extracted to plain text; navigation and recommendation sections removed. Equations, tables and image content may be incomplete; use the source for technical interpretation.
sha256
e992eb3c84c037c4fe1fc85e513ff359b9a506639a3340b61a8d986c0833ccf4
checked At
2026-10-24

Open this publication in the interactive library