Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, Cook AJ, Anderson ML, Hawkes RJ, Hansen KE, Turner JA. · JAMA · 2016 · Randomized controlled trial; single-blind (interviewers)

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

At 26 weeks, meaningful functional improvement occurred in 60.5% receiving MBSR, 57.7% receiving CBT and 44.1% receiving usual care. Both active treatments improved pain outcomes; no significant difference separated MBSR and CBT.

Recorded limitations

These are clinical pain and function outcomes, not molecular measurements. The trial does not establish superiority over CBT.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Randomized controlled trial; single-blind (interviewers)
assessment
basis
The article explicitly describes an interviewer-blind trial with follow-up interviewers masked to treatment group.
sources

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323 · https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01467843

assessed At
2026-10-23
registered Masking Basis
false
category
single-blind-rct
peer Reviewed
true
trust Factor
score
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
true
blinding
single
peer Reviewed
true
basis
The article explicitly describes an interviewer-blind trial with follow-up interviewers masked to treatment group.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323 · https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01467843

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
intervention
MBSR
comparator
Cognitive behavioural therapy or usual care
sample
342 adults with chronic low-back pain
measurement
Pain bothersomeness and functional limitations
timing
8 weeks; primary endpoint at 26 weeks; follow-up to 52 weeks
trial Id
NCT01467843
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
evidence Type
Clinical outcomes
source URLs

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323

checked At
2026-10-23
review Scope
Publication abstract and selected full-text methods; Jadad assessment pending
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:mindfulness-clinical
    title
    Mindfulness-based interventions: controlled clinical trials
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
pmid-27002445
doi
10.1001/jama.2016.2323
pmid
27002445
citation Snapshot
count
661
source
Crossref
retrieved At
2026-10-23
url
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1001/jama.2016.2323
citations By Collection
language
661
Complete approved library record
id
pmid-27002445
aliases
None recorded
title
Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
journal
JAMA
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2016
authors
Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, Cook AJ, Anderson ML, Hawkes RJ, Hansen KE, Turner JA.
design
Randomized controlled trial; single-blind (interviewers)
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1001/jama.2016.2323
pmid
27002445
urls

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
At 26 weeks, meaningful functional improvement occurred in 60.5% receiving MBSR, 57.7% receiving CBT and 44.1% receiving usual care. Both active treatments improved pain outcomes; no significant difference separated MBSR and CBT.
limitation
These are clinical pain and function outcomes, not molecular measurements. The trial does not establish superiority over CBT.
citation Count
661
citation Snapshot
count
661
source
Crossref
retrieved At
2026-10-23
url
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1001/jama.2016.2323
study Design Assessment
basis
The article explicitly describes an interviewer-blind trial with follow-up interviewers masked to treatment group.
sources

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323 · https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01467843

assessed At
2026-10-23
registered Masking Basis
false
category
single-blind-rct
peer Reviewed
true
paper Trust Assessment
score
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
true
blinding
single
peer Reviewed
true
basis
The article explicitly describes an interviewer-blind trial with follow-up interviewers masked to treatment group.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323 · https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01467843

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
citations By Collection
language
661
topics
  1. key
    language:mindfulness-clinical
    title
    Mindfulness-based interventions: controlled clinical trials
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
jama
journal Label
JAMA
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-mindfulness-clinical-pmid-27002445
    record Id
    pmid-27002445
    title
    Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    journal
    JAMA
    year
    2016
    authors
    Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, Cook AJ, Anderson ML, Hawkes RJ, Hansen KE, Turner JA.
    design
    Randomized controlled trial; single-blind (interviewers)
    urls

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323

    quotes
    None recorded
    summary
    At 26 weeks, meaningful functional improvement occurred in 60.5% receiving MBSR, 57.7% receiving CBT and 44.1% receiving usual care. Both active treatments improved pain outcomes; no significant difference separated MBSR and CBT.
    limitation
    These are clinical pain and function outcomes, not molecular measurements. The trial does not establish superiority over CBT.
    citation Count
    661
    citation Snapshot
    count
    661
    source
    Crossref
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    url
    https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1001/jama.2016.2323
    study Design Assessment
    basis
    The article explicitly describes an interviewer-blind trial with follow-up interviewers masked to treatment group.
    sources

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323 · https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01467843

    assessed At
    2026-10-23
    registered Masking Basis
    false
    category
    single-blind-rct
    peer Reviewed
    true
    source Pages
    None recorded
    targets
    None recorded
    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    doi
    10.1001/jama.2016.2323
    pmid
    27002445
    evidence
    intervention
    MBSR
    comparator
    Cognitive behavioural therapy or usual care
    sample
    342 adults with chronic low-back pain
    measurement
    Pain bothersomeness and functional limitations
    timing
    8 weeks; primary endpoint at 26 weeks; follow-up to 52 weeks
    trial Id
    NCT01467843
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    evidence Type
    Clinical outcomes
    source URLs

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323

    checked At
    2026-10-23
    review Scope
    Publication abstract and selected full-text methods; Jadad assessment pending
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    blinding
    single
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    The article explicitly describes an interviewer-blind trial with follow-up interviewers masked to treatment group.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323 · https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01467843

    review Scope
    Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
    assessed At
    2026-10-27
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    4
    topic Id
    mindfulness-clinical
    topic Title
    Mindfulness-based interventions: controlled clinical trials
    trust Score
    2
evidence
intervention
MBSR
comparator
Cognitive behavioural therapy or usual care
sample
342 adults with chronic low-back pain
measurement
Pain bothersomeness and functional limitations
timing
8 weeks; primary endpoint at 26 weeks; follow-up to 52 weeks
trial Id
NCT01467843
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
evidence Type
Clinical outcomes
source URLs

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4914381/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27002445/ · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2323

checked At
2026-10-23
review Scope
Publication abstract and selected full-text methods; Jadad assessment pending
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
reuse-review
retrieval Available
false
url
https://pmc-oa-opendata.s3.amazonaws.com/PMC4914381.1/PMC4914381.1.xml?md5=77844e350d1cee4353165726962a61ee
pmcid
PMC4914381
rights
license
TDM
use
Private text mining
public Fulltext Redistribution
false
provider Upload
false
model Training
false
basis
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/pmcaws/
article Rights

This file is available for text mining. It may also be used consistent with the principles of fair use under the copyright law.

sha256
63a3abee351d470b3614a194731f797ea948831506f7a85af4e621d52a44d942
checked At
2026-10-24

Open this publication in the interactive library