Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy compared to usual treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in adults with psychosis in forensic settings: Randomized controlled trial.

Every-Palmer S, Flewett T, Dean S, Hansby O, Freeland A, Weatherall M, Bell E. · Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2024 · Single-blind randomized controlled trial

Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

In 24 forensic patients with psychosis and PTSD, blinded assessments favoured EMDR over routine-care waitlist for clinician-rated PTSD symptoms. The estimated difference averaged across follow-ups was 11.4 points, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3 to 21.4.

Recorded limitations

Recruitment was curtailed by pandemic restrictions, leaving a small sample. Psychotic symptoms and adverse events did not differ significantly, so effectiveness claims remain specific to the measured PTSD outcomes.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Single-blind randomized controlled trial
assessment
category
peer-reviewed
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Reported design checked against the primary publication abstract. Blinding terminology reflects the source report, not an independent risk-of-bias rating.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

assessed At
2026-10-26
registered Masking Basis
false
trust Factor
score
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
true
blinding
single
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Reported design checked against the primary publication abstract. Blinding terminology reflects the source report, not an independent risk-of-bias rating.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
intervention
Therapist-delivered EMDR
comparator
Routine-care waitlist
evidence Type
Clinical or experimental outcomes
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

checked At
2026-10-26
review Scope
Primary publication abstract and bibliographic identity checked; comprehensive full-text risk-of-bias and Jadad assessment pending.
discovery Sources

https://daytab.com/study/n2bqk2h9 · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38227442

selection Policy
Success-focused discovery selection, with material limitations retained; not an exhaustive systematic review.
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    vision:i
    title
    EMDR for PTSD and related mental-health outcomes
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
pmid-38227442
doi
10.1037/tra0001643
pmid
38227442
citation Snapshot
count
12
source
Europe PMC
retrieved At
2026-10-26
url
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38227442
citations By Collection
vision
12
Complete approved library record
id
pmid-38227442
publication Key
doi:10.1037/tra0001643
aliases
None recorded
title
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy compared to usual treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in adults with psychosis in forensic settings: Randomized controlled trial.
journal
Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2024
authors
Every-Palmer S, Flewett T, Dean S, Hansby O, Freeland A, Weatherall M, Bell E.
design
Single-blind randomized controlled trial
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1037/tra0001643
pmid
38227442
urls

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

collections

vision

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
In 24 forensic patients with psychosis and PTSD, blinded assessments favoured EMDR over routine-care waitlist for clinician-rated PTSD symptoms. The estimated difference averaged across follow-ups was 11.4 points, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3 to 21.4.
limitation
Recruitment was curtailed by pandemic restrictions, leaving a small sample. Psychotic symptoms and adverse events did not differ significantly, so effectiveness claims remain specific to the measured PTSD outcomes.
citation Count
12
citation Snapshot
count
12
source
Europe PMC
retrieved At
2026-10-26
url
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38227442
study Design Assessment
category
peer-reviewed
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Reported design checked against the primary publication abstract. Blinding terminology reflects the source report, not an independent risk-of-bias rating.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

assessed At
2026-10-26
registered Masking Basis
false
paper Trust Assessment
score
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
true
blinding
single
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Reported design checked against the primary publication abstract. Blinding terminology reflects the source report, not an independent risk-of-bias rating.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
citations By Collection
vision
12
topics
  1. key
    vision:i
    title
    EMDR for PTSD and related mental-health outcomes
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
psychologicaltrauma
journal Label
Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy
chapter Entries
  1. title
    Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy compared to usual treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in adults with psychosis in forensic settings: Randomized controlled trial.
    journal
    Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy
    year
    2024
    authors
    Every-Palmer S, Flewett T, Dean S, Hansby O, Freeland A, Weatherall M, Bell E.
    design
    Single-blind randomized controlled trial
    urls

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

    doi
    10.1037/tra0001643
    pmid
    38227442
    targets
    None recorded
    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    citation Count
    12
    citation Snapshot
    count
    12
    source
    Europe PMC
    retrieved At
    2026-10-26
    url
    https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38227442
    study Design Assessment
    category
    peer-reviewed
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Reported design checked against the primary publication abstract. Blinding terminology reflects the source report, not an independent risk-of-bias rating.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

    assessed At
    2026-10-26
    registered Masking Basis
    false
    evidence
    intervention
    Therapist-delivered EMDR
    comparator
    Routine-care waitlist
    evidence Type
    Clinical or experimental outcomes
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

    checked At
    2026-10-26
    review Scope
    Primary publication abstract and bibliographic identity checked; comprehensive full-text risk-of-bias and Jadad assessment pending.
    discovery Sources

    https://daytab.com/study/n2bqk2h9 · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38227442

    selection Policy
    Success-focused discovery selection, with material limitations retained; not an exhaustive systematic review.
    id
    vision-i-pmid-38227442
    record Id
    pmid-38227442
    quotes
    None recorded
    source Pages
    None recorded
    summary
    In 24 forensic patients with psychosis and PTSD, blinded assessments favoured EMDR over routine-care waitlist for clinician-rated PTSD symptoms. The estimated difference averaged across follow-ups was 11.4 points, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3 to 21.4.
    limitation
    Recruitment was curtailed by pandemic restrictions, leaving a small sample. Psychotic symptoms and adverse events did not differ significantly, so effectiveness claims remain specific to the measured PTSD outcomes.
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    blinding
    single
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Reported design checked against the primary publication abstract. Blinding terminology reflects the source report, not an independent risk-of-bias rating.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

    review Scope
    Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
    assessed At
    2026-10-27
    publication Key
    doi:10.1037/tra0001643
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    1
    topic Id
    i
    topic Title
    EMDR for PTSD and related mental-health outcomes
    trust Score
    2
evidence
intervention
Therapist-delivered EMDR
comparator
Routine-care waitlist
evidence Type
Clinical or experimental outcomes
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38227442/ · https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001643

checked At
2026-10-26
review Scope
Primary publication abstract and bibliographic identity checked; comprehensive full-text risk-of-bias and Jadad assessment pending.
discovery Sources

https://daytab.com/study/n2bqk2h9 · https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38227442

selection Policy
Success-focused discovery selection, with material limitations retained; not an exhaustive systematic review.
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    ptsd
    evidence
    1. field
      curated primary-source summary
      text
      In 24 forensic patients with psychosis and PTSD, blinded assessments favoured EMDR over routine-care waitlist for clinician-rated PTSD symptoms. The estimated difference averaged across follow-ups was 11.4 points, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3 to 21.4.
      matched Text
      ptsd
  2. id
    psychosis
    evidence
    1. field
      curated primary-source summary
      text
      In 24 forensic patients with psychosis and PTSD, blinded assessments favoured EMDR over routine-care waitlist for clinician-rated PTSD symptoms. The estimated difference averaged across follow-ups was 11.4 points, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3 to 21.4.
      matched Text
      psychosis
conditions

ptsd · psychosis

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library