Virtual Reality Breathing Interventions for Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Cortez-Vázquez Gabriela, Adriaanse Marcel, Burchell George Louis, Ostelo Raymond, Panayiotou Georgia, Vlemincx Elke · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · 2024 · Review or conceptual paper
Recorded summary
Six randomised trials compared VR and non-VR breathing interventions. Pooled findings showed no reliable additional mental-health benefit from immersive delivery.
Recorded limitations
Systematic review of VR versus other methods of delivering breathing exercises.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Review or conceptual paper
- assessment
- category
- peer-reviewed-study
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- The publication is a peer-reviewed journal study or review. A qualifying randomised comparison was not verified in the assessed source.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- trust Factor
- score
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- blinding
- not-applicable
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- The publication is a peer-reviewed journal study or review. A qualifying randomised comparison was not verified in the assessed source.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38236355/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- review Scope
- Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
- assessed At
- 2026-11-05
- display Crosses
- 1
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review or framework
- measurement
- Review or framework
- relationship Note
- Systematic review of VR versus other methods of delivering breathing exercises.
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:mindfulness-biofeedback
- title
- Mindfulness Biofeedback / AR / VR / Mixed Reality
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- pmid-38236355
- doi
- 10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- pmid
- 38236355
- citation Snapshot
- Not recorded
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- id
- pmid-38236355
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Virtual Reality Breathing Interventions for Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- journal
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2024
- authors
- Cortez-Vázquez Gabriela, Adriaanse Marcel, Burchell George Louis, Ostelo Raymond, Panayiotou Georgia, Vlemincx Elke
- design
- Review or conceptual paper
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- pmid
- 38236355
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- collections
language
- categories
Mindfulness and biofeedback
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Six randomised trials compared VR and non-VR breathing interventions. Pooled findings showed no reliable additional mental-health benefit from immersive delivery.
- limitation
- Systematic review of VR versus other methods of delivering breathing exercises.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- study Design Assessment
- category
- peer-reviewed-study
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- The publication is a peer-reviewed journal study or review. A qualifying randomised comparison was not verified in the assessed source.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- blinding
- not-applicable
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- The publication is a peer-reviewed journal study or review. A qualifying randomised comparison was not verified in the assessed source.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38236355/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- review Scope
- Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
- assessed At
- 2026-11-05
- display Crosses
- 1
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:mindfulness-biofeedback
- title
- Mindfulness Biofeedback / AR / VR / Mixed Reality
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- appliedpsychophysiologyandbiofeedback
- journal Label
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
- chapter Entries
- title
- Virtual Reality Breathing Interventions for Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- doi
- 10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- pmid
- 38236355
- journal
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
- year
- 2024
- authors
- Cortez-Vázquez Gabriela, Adriaanse Marcel, Burchell George Louis, Ostelo Raymond, Panayiotou Georgia, Vlemincx Elke
- design
- Review or conceptual paper
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- targets
- None recorded
- categories
Mindfulness and biofeedback
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review or framework
- measurement
- Review or framework
- relationship Note
- Systematic review of VR versus other methods of delivering breathing exercises.
- id
- language-biofeedback-a12
- record Id
- pmid-38236355
- summary
- Six randomised trials compared VR and non-VR breathing interventions. Pooled findings showed no reliable additional mental-health benefit from immersive delivery.
- limitation
- Systematic review of VR versus other methods of delivering breathing exercises.
- quotes
- None recorded
- source Pages
- None recorded
- study Design Assessment
- category
- peer-reviewed-study
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- The publication is a peer-reviewed journal study or review. A qualifying randomised comparison was not verified in the assessed source.
- sources
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- blinding
- not-applicable
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- The publication is a peer-reviewed journal study or review. A qualifying randomised comparison was not verified in the assessed source.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38236355/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09611-4
- review Scope
- Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
- assessed At
- 2026-11-05
- display Crosses
- 1
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 2
- topic Id
- mindfulness-biofeedback
- topic Title
- Mindfulness Biofeedback / AR / VR / Mixed Reality
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review or framework
- measurement
- Review or framework
- relationship Note
- Systematic review of VR versus other methods of delivering breathing exercises.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false