Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X. · European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025 · Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
Recorded limitations
Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- rct
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- rct
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40243164
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- vision:children
- title
- EMDR for children and adolescents
- collection
- vision
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- vision:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- vision
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- vision:emdr-youth
- title
- EMDR for youth
- collection
- vision
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- pmid-40243164
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- citation Snapshot
- count
- 7
- source
- Crossref
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-23
- citations By Collection
- vision
- 7
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
EMDR
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- source Content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- approaches
EMDR
- id
- pmid-40243164
- aliases
youth-pmid-40243164
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- collections
vision
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitation
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- citation Count
- 7
- citation Snapshot
- count
- 7
- source
- Crossref
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-23
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- rct
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- rct
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- vision
- 7
- topics
- key
- vision:children
- title
- EMDR for children and adolescents
- collection
- vision
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- vision:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- vision
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- vision:emdr-youth
- title
- EMDR for youth
- collection
- vision
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- europeanjournalofpsychotraumatology
- journal Label
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- chapter Entries
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- targets
- None recorded
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- citation Count
- 7
- citation Snapshot
- count
- 7
- source
- Crossref
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-23
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- rct
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40243164
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- record Id
- pmid-40243164
- quotes
- None recorded
- source Pages
- None recorded
- summary
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitation
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- id
- vision-children-pmid-40243164
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- rct
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- collections
vision
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- kind
- Journal article
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- research Group
- children
- finding
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- legacy Article Stars
- Not recorded
- legacy Rating Basis
- Not recorded
- stars
- 2
- rating Basis
- Publication identity and reported study design checked. Outcome blinding is not established in the material reviewed; no single- or double-blind RCT classification is assigned.
- aliases
youth-pmid-40243164
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
depression · stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- depressive
- field
- findings
- text
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- pmid-40243164
- collections
vision
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- source Content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
EMDR
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
EMDR
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40243164
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- pmcid
- PMC12006939
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
EMDR
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- existing Repository Matches
- id
- pmid-40243164
- matched By
PMID · DOI · normalized exact title
- collections
vision
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- rct
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitations
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- e79866b50b924dec95fbe5b9818ed56dbe41e9371abdf5f4a1bd53adbf76fd19
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.911130+00:00
- sha256
- 0222105e2704f3e230fd897d9858d5cb84316349078612b39e62a46b8700061b
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.914333+00:00
- sha256
- d2ab3a61965b825f4a9efd7305e465036d605cc645e3c57370c3ea1ac3c10d9f
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- collection
- vision
- chapter Number
- 1
- topic Id
- children
- topic Title
- EMDR for children and adolescents
- trust Score
- 2
- id
- vision-universal-mind-mobile-lab-pmid-40243164
- aliases
youth-pmid-40243164
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- collections
vision
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
depression · stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- depressive
- field
- findings
- text
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- pmid-40243164
- collections
vision
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- summary
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitation
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40243164
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- rct
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- rct
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- 7
- citation Snapshot
- count
- 7
- source
- Crossref
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-23
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- source Content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
EMDR
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
EMDR
- record Id
- pmid-40243164
- source Pages
- None recorded
- research Group
- children
- legacy Article Stars
- Not recorded
- legacy Rating Basis
- Not recorded
- stars
- 2
- rating Basis
- Publication identity and reported study design checked. Outcome blinding is not established in the material reviewed; no single- or double-blind RCT classification is assigned.
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40243164
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- pmcid
- PMC12006939
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
EMDR
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- existing Repository Matches
- id
- pmid-40243164
- matched By
PMID · DOI · normalized exact title
- collections
vision
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- rct
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitations
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- e79866b50b924dec95fbe5b9818ed56dbe41e9371abdf5f4a1bd53adbf76fd19
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.911130+00:00
- sha256
- 0222105e2704f3e230fd897d9858d5cb84316349078612b39e62a46b8700061b
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.914333+00:00
- sha256
- d2ab3a61965b825f4a9efd7305e465036d605cc645e3c57370c3ea1ac3c10d9f
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- collection
- vision
- chapter Number
- 8
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 2
- id
- vision-emdr-youth-pmid-40243164
- aliases
youth-pmid-40243164
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- collections
vision
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
depression · stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- depressive
- field
- findings
- text
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- pmid-40243164
- collections
vision
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- summary
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitation
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40243164
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- rct
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- rct
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- 7
- citation Snapshot
- count
- 7
- source
- Crossref
- retrieved At
- 2026-10-23
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- source Content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
EMDR
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
EMDR
- record Id
- pmid-40243164
- source Pages
- None recorded
- research Group
- children
- legacy Article Stars
- Not recorded
- legacy Rating Basis
- Not recorded
- stars
- 2
- rating Basis
- Publication identity and reported study design checked. Outcome blinding is not established in the material reviewed; no single- or double-blind RCT classification is assigned.
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40243164
- title
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- authors
- Zheng S, Shen Y, Geng F, Ye M, Song S, Wang R, Zhang S, Ou Y, Zhou X.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- European journal of psychotraumatology
- doi
- 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- pmid
- 40243164
- pmcid
- PMC12006939
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
EMDR
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40243164
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40243164
- existing Repository Matches
- id
- pmid-40243164
- matched By
PMID · DOI · normalized exact title
- collections
vision
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- rct
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- limitations
- Small sample, short follow-up, no attention-matched psychotherapy control and unclear assessor masking.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- e79866b50b924dec95fbe5b9818ed56dbe41e9371abdf5f4a1bd53adbf76fd19
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.911130+00:00
- sha256
- 0222105e2704f3e230fd897d9858d5cb84316349078612b39e62a46b8700061b
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.914333+00:00
- sha256
- d2ab3a61965b825f4a9efd7305e465036d605cc645e3c57370c3ea1ac3c10d9f
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40243164
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.776183+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 29c412dad7aaf8805a8e422544f2049cb21dba2ca46793da60ee1bec2f1ea46b
- revision
- r1-29c412dad7aa
- collection
- vision
- chapter Number
- 8
- topic Id
- emdr-youth
- topic Title
- EMDR for youth
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six 60-minute EMDR sessions across two weeks added to an SSRI versus SSRI alone; assessments through four weeks.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- population
- age
- 12–18-year-old adolescent inpatients with depression and stressful-life-event memories.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 randomized and completed; 15 per arm.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40243164
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Supports a clinically governed referral/treatment research question; does not validate generic EMDR-like stimulation. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Intervention distinguishable
- providers
- Unblinded
- assessors
- Independent of treatment; group masking not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40243164/ · https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488558 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006939/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12006939/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1080%2F20008066.2025.2488558
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- depressive
- field
- findings
- text
- The add-on EMDR arm improved more on depression, event-related distress and rumination over time. This tests EMDR with medication and hospital care, not stand-alone treatment or a community wellbeing activity.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing on depressive symptoms, stress and rumination in adolescents with depression: a randomised controlled trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- conditions
depression · stress
- topic Trust Scores
2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false