Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Remote EMDR versus CBT for PTSD after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a randomized trial.

Çınaroğlu M, Yılmazer E, Ülker SV, Sayar GH. · Frontiers in Psychiatry · 2026 · Randomized controlled trial · open-label

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

In 89 randomized earthquake survivors, remote EMDR and CBT reduced PTSD, depression and anxiety scores relative to waitlist across 12 sessions.

Recorded limitations

Outcomes were self-reported. Therapists and participants knew allocation; assessor/analyst masking does not blind the people reporting symptoms. Direct superiority comparisons were not the trial’s primary power target.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Randomized controlled trial · open-label
assessment
category
rct-open-label
peer Reviewed
true
basis
The methods describe open-label therapy and self-reported outcomes, with an independent blinded assistant and blinded analysis. No blinded clinical endpoint establishes a single-blind outcome comparison.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

reviewed At
2026-10-23
trust Factor
score
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
true
blinding
open-label
peer Reviewed
true
basis
The methods describe open-label therapy and self-reported outcomes, with an independent blinded assistant and blinded analysis. No blinded clinical endpoint establishes a single-blind outcome comparison.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
Not recorded
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    vision:online
    title
    Online EMDR
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
pmid-42254728
doi
10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057
pmid
42254728
citation Snapshot
count
0
source
Crossref
retrieved At
2026-10-23
citations By Collection
vision
0
Complete approved library record
id
pmid-42254728
publication Key
doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057
aliases
None recorded
title
Remote EMDR versus CBT for PTSD after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a randomized trial.
journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
publisher Family
frontiers
publisher Family Label
Frontiers
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2026
authors
Çınaroğlu M, Yılmazer E, Ülker SV, Sayar GH.
design
Randomized controlled trial · open-label
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057
pmid
42254728
urls

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13236641/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

collections

vision

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
In 89 randomized earthquake survivors, remote EMDR and CBT reduced PTSD, depression and anxiety scores relative to waitlist across 12 sessions.
limitation
Outcomes were self-reported. Therapists and participants knew allocation; assessor/analyst masking does not blind the people reporting symptoms. Direct superiority comparisons were not the trial’s primary power target.
citation Count
0
citation Snapshot
count
0
source
Crossref
retrieved At
2026-10-23
study Design Assessment
category
rct-open-label
peer Reviewed
true
basis
The methods describe open-label therapy and self-reported outcomes, with an independent blinded assistant and blinded analysis. No blinded clinical endpoint establishes a single-blind outcome comparison.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

reviewed At
2026-10-23
paper Trust Assessment
score
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
randomized Controlled Trial
true
blinding
open-label
peer Reviewed
true
basis
The methods describe open-label therapy and self-reported outcomes, with an independent blinded assistant and blinded analysis. No blinded clinical endpoint establishes a single-blind outcome comparison.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

review Scope
Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
assessed At
2026-10-27
citations By Collection
vision
0
topics
  1. key
    vision:online
    title
    Online EMDR
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
journal Key
frontiersinpsychiatry
journal Label
Frontiers in Psychiatry
chapter Entries
  1. title
    Remote EMDR versus CBT for PTSD after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a randomized trial.
    journal
    Frontiers in Psychiatry
    year
    2026
    authors
    Çınaroğlu M, Yılmazer E, Ülker SV, Sayar GH.
    design
    Randomized controlled trial · open-label
    urls

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13236641/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

    doi
    10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057
    pmid
    42254728
    targets
    None recorded
    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    citation Count
    0
    citation Snapshot
    count
    0
    source
    Crossref
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct-open-label
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    The methods describe open-label therapy and self-reported outcomes, with an independent blinded assistant and blinded analysis. No blinded clinical endpoint establishes a single-blind outcome comparison.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

    reviewed At
    2026-10-23
    record Id
    pmid-42254728
    quotes
    None recorded
    source Pages
    None recorded
    summary
    In 89 randomized earthquake survivors, remote EMDR and CBT reduced PTSD, depression and anxiety scores relative to waitlist across 12 sessions.
    limitation
    Outcomes were self-reported. Therapists and participants knew allocation; assessor/analyst masking does not blind the people reporting symptoms. Direct superiority comparisons were not the trial’s primary power target.
    id
    vision-online-pmid-42254728
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    blinding
    open-label
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    The methods describe open-label therapy and self-reported outcomes, with an independent blinded assistant and blinded analysis. No blinded clinical endpoint establishes a single-blind outcome comparison.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254728/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057

    review Scope
    Existing publication-specific assessments and bibliographic indexing; no blanket full-text appraisal.
    assessed At
    2026-10-27
    publication Key
    doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1779057
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    3
    topic Id
    online
    topic Title
    Online EMDR
    trust Score
    2
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    ptsd
    evidence
    1. field
      title
      text
      Remote EMDR versus CBT for PTSD after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a randomized trial.
      matched Text
      PTSD
conditions

ptsd

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
open-license
retrieval Available
true
url
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13236641/fullTextXML
pmcid
PMC13236641
rights
license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
statement

Copyright © 2026 Çınaroğlu, Yılmazer, Ülker and Sayar. 2026 Çınaroğlu, Yılmazer, Ülker and Sayar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

sha256
e5b9b1402b5048d83a2fa0784301ef92f6c3256e985b30cce63d33615921ac19
checked At
2026-10-24

Open this publication in the interactive library