Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).

Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T. · Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026 · Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.

Recorded limitations

Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
assessment
category
rct-masking-unclear
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
basis
rct
masking Roles
participants
Unblinded
providers
Unblinded
assessors
Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
analysts
Not established
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

review Scope
selected-methods
trust Factor
score
2
display Crosses
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-confirmed
masking Roles
participants
Unblinded
providers
Unblinded
assessors
Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
analysts
Not established
basis
rct
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

assessed At
2026-11-02
review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
review Limit
AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
intervention
EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
provider
Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
comparator
See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
sample
96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
population
age
Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
age Fit
mixed-overlap
sample
96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
setting
Not separately established; see population/intervention description
community

refugees · war-trauma

measurement
Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
trial Id
publication-42324567
trial Registries
None recorded
registry Scope
Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
relationship Note
Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
quality
tier
priority
qualification
Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
false
jadad Score
Not recorded
masking Roles
participants
Unblinded
providers
Unblinded
assessors
Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
analysts
Not established
harms And Attrition
Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

retrieved At
2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    vision:iii
    title
    EMDR for PTSD in refugees and asylum seekers
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  2. key
    vision:children
    title
    EMDR for children and adolescents
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  3. key
    vision:universal-mind-mobile-lab
    title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  4. key
    vision:emdr-youth
    title
    EMDR for youth
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  5. key
    vision:youth-access-connection
    title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    Not recorded
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
pmid-42324567
doi
10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
pmid
42324567
citation Snapshot
count
0
source
Europe PMC
retrieved At
2026-10-23
citations By Collection
vision
0
Complete approved library record
lab Relevance
relationship
direct-response
implication
Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
transfer Limit
Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
institutions
None recorded
institution Evidence
None recorded
research Topics

EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

publication Status
pmid
42324567
checked At
2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
pub Types

research-article · Journal Article

indexed Notices
None recorded
crossref Updates
None recorded
notice Records
None recorded
scope
Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
notice Summary
Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
randomized Study Unit Id
publication-42324567
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-02
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
source Revision
r1-11c5dcc6b172
source Content Hash
11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

retrieved At
2026-11-02
study Family Id
publication-42324567
approaches

EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

id
pmid-42324567
aliases

youth-pmid-42324567

title
Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
journal
Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2026
authors
Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
design
Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
pmid
42324567
urls

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

collections

vision

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
limitation
Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
citation Count
0
citation Snapshot
count
0
source
Europe PMC
retrieved At
2026-10-23
study Design Assessment
category
rct-masking-unclear
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
basis
rct
masking Roles
participants
Unblinded
providers
Unblinded
assessors
Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
analysts
Not established
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

review Scope
selected-methods
paper Trust Assessment
score
2
display Crosses
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-confirmed
masking Roles
participants
Unblinded
providers
Unblinded
assessors
Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
analysts
Not established
basis
rct
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

assessed At
2026-11-02
review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
review Limit
AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
citations By Collection
vision
0
topics
  1. key
    vision:iii
    title
    EMDR for PTSD in refugees and asylum seekers
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  2. key
    vision:children
    title
    EMDR for children and adolescents
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  3. key
    vision:universal-mind-mobile-lab
    title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  4. key
    vision:emdr-youth
    title
    EMDR for youth
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    2
  5. key
    vision:youth-access-connection
    title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    collection
    vision
    trust Score
    Not recorded
journal Key
childandadolescentpsychiatryandmentalhealth
journal Label
Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
chapter Entries
  1. title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    year
    2026
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    targets
    None recorded
    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    citation Count
    0
    citation Snapshot
    count
    0
    source
    Europe PMC
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct-masking-unclear
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    rct
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    intervention
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-42324567
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    quotes
    None recorded
    source Pages
    None recorded
    summary
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitation
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    id
    vision-iii-pmid-42324567
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    basis
    rct
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    collections

    vision

    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    kind
    Journal article
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    finding
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    legacy Article Stars
    Not recorded
    legacy Rating Basis
    Not recorded
    stars
    2
    rating Basis
    Independent assessors were blinded to EMDR versus KIDNET, but knew active-treatment versus waitlist status. The single-blind designation applies to the active-treatment comparison; masking was incomplete across all three arms.
    aliases

    youth-pmid-42324567

    archive Entries
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    ptsd · trauma

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      ptsd
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        PTSD
      2. field
        findings
        text
        Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
        matched Text
        PTSD
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      trauma
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        Trauma
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    collections

    vision

    groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      refugees
      relation
      direct
    2. category Id
      war-trauma
      relation
      direct
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    source Content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    research Topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-42324567
    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    pmcid
    PMC13576352
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    existing Repository Matches
    1. id
      pmid-42324567
      matched By

      PMID · DOI · normalized exact title

      collections

      vision

    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    intervention
    description And Dose
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    rct
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitations
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      7aa8307178f45663036287467a67e3d20b97bfa3a081341123a1a6eaa96014c8
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.153846+00:00
      sha256
      7c7c28bc6c662b6c413d47ad6274ebbd131671edadc6c5892222719a28f40746
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.156823+00:00
      sha256
      b2d2c71ddbd77890eb51b2aa5414b08325aa24d5045a2c648c033b96906e2fe2
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    1
    topic Id
    iii
    topic Title
    EMDR for PTSD in refugees and asylum seekers
    trust Score
    2
  2. title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    year
    2026
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    targets
    None recorded
    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    citation Count
    0
    citation Snapshot
    count
    0
    source
    Europe PMC
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct-masking-unclear
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    rct
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    intervention
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-42324567
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    quotes
    None recorded
    source Pages
    None recorded
    summary
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitation
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    id
    vision-children-pmid-42324567
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    basis
    rct
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    collections

    vision

    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    kind
    Journal article
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    finding
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    legacy Article Stars
    Not recorded
    legacy Rating Basis
    Not recorded
    stars
    2
    rating Basis
    Independent assessors were blinded to EMDR versus KIDNET, but knew active-treatment versus waitlist status. The single-blind designation applies to the active-treatment comparison; masking was incomplete across all three arms.
    aliases

    youth-pmid-42324567

    archive Entries
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    ptsd · trauma

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      ptsd
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        PTSD
      2. field
        findings
        text
        Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
        matched Text
        PTSD
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      trauma
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        Trauma
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    collections

    vision

    groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      refugees
      relation
      direct
    2. category Id
      war-trauma
      relation
      direct
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    source Content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    research Topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-42324567
    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    pmcid
    PMC13576352
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    existing Repository Matches
    1. id
      pmid-42324567
      matched By

      PMID · DOI · normalized exact title

      collections

      vision

    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    intervention
    description And Dose
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    rct
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitations
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      7aa8307178f45663036287467a67e3d20b97bfa3a081341123a1a6eaa96014c8
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.153846+00:00
      sha256
      7c7c28bc6c662b6c413d47ad6274ebbd131671edadc6c5892222719a28f40746
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.156823+00:00
      sha256
      b2d2c71ddbd77890eb51b2aa5414b08325aa24d5045a2c648c033b96906e2fe2
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    1
    topic Id
    children
    topic Title
    EMDR for children and adolescents
    trust Score
    2
  3. id
    vision-universal-mind-mobile-lab-pmid-42324567
    aliases

    youth-pmid-42324567

    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    collections

    vision

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    ptsd · trauma

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      ptsd
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        PTSD
      2. field
        findings
        text
        Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
        matched Text
        PTSD
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      trauma
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        Trauma
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    collections

    vision

    groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      refugees
      relation
      direct
    2. category Id
      war-trauma
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    summary
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitation
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    intervention
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-42324567
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct-masking-unclear
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    rct
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    basis
    rct
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    0
    citation Snapshot
    count
    0
    source
    Europe PMC
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    source Content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    research Topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    source Pages
    None recorded
    legacy Article Stars
    Not recorded
    legacy Rating Basis
    Not recorded
    stars
    2
    rating Basis
    Independent assessors were blinded to EMDR versus KIDNET, but knew active-treatment versus waitlist status. The single-blind designation applies to the active-treatment comparison; masking was incomplete across all three arms.
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-42324567
    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    pmcid
    PMC13576352
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    existing Repository Matches
    1. id
      pmid-42324567
      matched By

      PMID · DOI · normalized exact title

      collections

      vision

    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    intervention
    description And Dose
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    rct
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitations
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      7aa8307178f45663036287467a67e3d20b97bfa3a081341123a1a6eaa96014c8
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.153846+00:00
      sha256
      7c7c28bc6c662b6c413d47ad6274ebbd131671edadc6c5892222719a28f40746
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.156823+00:00
      sha256
      b2d2c71ddbd77890eb51b2aa5414b08325aa24d5045a2c648c033b96906e2fe2
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    8
    topic Id
    universal-mind-mobile-lab
    topic Title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    trust Score
    2
  4. id
    vision-emdr-youth-pmid-42324567
    aliases

    youth-pmid-42324567

    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    collections

    vision

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    ptsd · trauma

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      ptsd
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        PTSD
      2. field
        findings
        text
        Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
        matched Text
        PTSD
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      trauma
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        Trauma
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    collections

    vision

    groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      refugees
      relation
      direct
    2. category Id
      war-trauma
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    summary
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitation
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    intervention
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-42324567
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct-masking-unclear
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    rct
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    basis
    rct
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    0
    citation Snapshot
    count
    0
    source
    Europe PMC
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    source Content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    research Topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    source Pages
    None recorded
    legacy Article Stars
    Not recorded
    legacy Rating Basis
    Not recorded
    stars
    2
    rating Basis
    Independent assessors were blinded to EMDR versus KIDNET, but knew active-treatment versus waitlist status. The single-blind designation applies to the active-treatment comparison; masking was incomplete across all three arms.
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-42324567
    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    pmcid
    PMC13576352
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    existing Repository Matches
    1. id
      pmid-42324567
      matched By

      PMID · DOI · normalized exact title

      collections

      vision

    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    intervention
    description And Dose
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    rct
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitations
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      7aa8307178f45663036287467a67e3d20b97bfa3a081341123a1a6eaa96014c8
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.153846+00:00
      sha256
      7c7c28bc6c662b6c413d47ad6274ebbd131671edadc6c5892222719a28f40746
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.156823+00:00
      sha256
      b2d2c71ddbd77890eb51b2aa5414b08325aa24d5045a2c648c033b96906e2fe2
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    8
    topic Id
    emdr-youth
    topic Title
    EMDR for youth
    trust Score
    2
  5. id
    vision-youth-access-connection-pmid-42324567
    aliases

    youth-pmid-42324567

    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    collections

    vision

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    ptsd · trauma

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      ptsd
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        PTSD
      2. field
        findings
        text
        Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
        matched Text
        PTSD
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      trauma
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
        matched Text
        Trauma
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    collections

    vision

    groups

    children · adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    1. category Id
      refugees
      relation
      direct
    2. category Id
      war-trauma
      relation
      direct
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    summary
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitation
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
    intervention
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-42324567
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    rct-masking-unclear
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    rct
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-confirmed
    masking Roles
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    basis
    rct
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    0
    citation Snapshot
    count
    0
    source
    Europe PMC
    retrieved At
    2026-10-23
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    source Content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    research Topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    pmid-42324567
    source Pages
    None recorded
    legacy Article Stars
    Not recorded
    legacy Rating Basis
    Not recorded
    stars
    2
    rating Basis
    Independent assessors were blinded to EMDR versus KIDNET, but knew active-treatment versus waitlist status. The single-blind designation applies to the active-treatment comparison; masking was incomplete across all three arms.
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-42324567
    title
    Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
    authors
    Velu ME, de Roos C, van der Aa N, Jongedijk R, Lindauer R, Mooren T.
    year
    2026
    journal
    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
    doi
    10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
    pmid
    42324567
    pmcid
    PMC13576352
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    EMDR · Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions
    None recorded
    institution Evidence
    None recorded
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-42324567
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-42324567
    existing Repository Matches
    1. id
      pmid-42324567
      matched By

      PMID · DOI · normalized exact title

      collections

      vision

    population
    age
    Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community

    refugees · war-trauma

    intervention
    description And Dose
    EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    rct
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    participants
    Unblinded
    providers
    Unblinded
    assessors
    Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
    analysts
    Not established
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
    limitations
    Younger mixed sample, treatment-versus-wait timing differences, incomplete assessor masking and short follow-up; after re-randomization dropout was 20.8% EMDR and 10.9% KIDNET.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      7aa8307178f45663036287467a67e3d20b97bfa3a081341123a1a6eaa96014c8
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.153846+00:00
      sha256
      7c7c28bc6c662b6c413d47ad6274ebbd131671edadc6c5892222719a28f40746
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:20.156823+00:00
      sha256
      b2d2c71ddbd77890eb51b2aa5414b08325aa24d5045a2c648c033b96906e2fe2
    publication Status
    pmid
    42324567
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.788336+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    11c5dcc6b172d9b78cd2938c1754a7bd145ff53356b84da682c83a929024f498
    revision
    r1-11c5dcc6b172
    collection
    vision
    chapter Number
    8
    topic Id
    youth-access-connection
    topic Title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    trust Score
    Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
intervention
EMDR or KIDNET, approximately eight weekly sessions plus parental guidance, versus wait-list.
provider
Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
comparator
See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
sample
96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
population
age
Refugee children aged 8–18; mean 13.52.
age Fit
mixed-overlap
sample
96 randomized initially; wait-list participants later re-randomized.
setting
Not separately established; see population/intervention description
community

refugees · war-trauma

measurement
Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
trial Id
publication-42324567
trial Registries
None recorded
registry Scope
Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
relationship Note
Outreach locations, language support and culturally informed engagement provide a concrete access model; therapy requires its clinical delivery and cannot be equated with an audiovisual experience. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
quality
tier
priority
qualification
Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
false
jadad Score
Not recorded
masking Roles
participants
Unblinded
providers
Unblinded
assessors
Masked to EMDR versus KIDNET, but not reliably to active treatment versus wait-list
analysts
Not established
harms And Attrition
Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42324567/ · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-026-01118-0 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13576352/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2Fs13034-026-01118-0

retrieved At
2026-11-02
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    ptsd
    evidence
    1. field
      title
      text
      Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
      matched Text
      PTSD
    2. field
      findings
      text
      Both treatments reduced clinician-rated PTSD more than waiting (EMDR d=1.31; KIDNET d=0.94). EMDR had a modest advantage on clinician-rated severity over KIDNET, without consistent superiority on other outcomes. Parent-reported results differed from child/clinician reports.
      matched Text
      PTSD
    scope
    Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
  2. id
    trauma
    evidence
    1. field
      title
      text
      Trauma-focused treatments for refugee children and adolescents with PTSD: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of EMDR and KIDNET versus a waitlist control group (the KIEM study).
      matched Text
      Trauma
    scope
    Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
conditions

ptsd · trauma

topic Trust Scores

2

full Text
status
open-license
retrieval Available
true
url
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13576352/fullTextXML
pmcid
PMC13576352
rights
license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
statement

© The Author(s) 2026 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

sha256
7c7c28bc6c662b6c413d47ad6274ebbd131671edadc6c5892222719a28f40746
checked At
2026-10-24

Open this publication in the interactive library