A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2015 · Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
Recorded limitations
Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- biteback-school-trial
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:black-dog-youth
- title
- Black Dog Institute · Youth research
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- source Content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2015
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitation
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:black-dog-youth
- title
- Black Dog Institute · Youth research
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- journal Key
- journalofmedicalinternetresearch
- journal Label
- Journal of medical Internet research
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-black-dog-youth-youth-pmid-26220564
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- year
- 2015
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
depression · stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- collections
language
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- summary
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitation
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- biteback-school-trial
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- source Content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- year
- 2015
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- pmcid
- PMC4705364
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- publication Type
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitations
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- a2e8dac4b114d87d38da52685ebb90b2d0601c80c4988ff867d8572bca898f70
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:58:32.772772+00:00
- sha256
- f06aa57f7dbe4c1cf6a0de4fc57fd97f4539243fade73386732737401b0ba389
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:58:33.654233+00:00
- sha256
- 50d4d1212e74b0a6278c4e07ae98432a652c7d088ac0c80348f5591cab5b5508
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- black-dog-youth
- topic Title
- Black Dog Institute · Youth research
- trust Score
- 2
- id
- language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-26220564
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- year
- 2015
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
depression · stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- collections
language
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- summary
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitation
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- biteback-school-trial
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- source Content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- year
- 2015
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- pmcid
- PMC4705364
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- publication Type
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitations
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- a2e8dac4b114d87d38da52685ebb90b2d0601c80c4988ff867d8572bca898f70
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:58:32.772772+00:00
- sha256
- f06aa57f7dbe4c1cf6a0de4fc57fd97f4539243fade73386732737401b0ba389
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:58:33.654233+00:00
- sha256
- 50d4d1212e74b0a6278c4e07ae98432a652c7d088ac0c80348f5591cab5b5508
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 3
- id
- language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-26220564
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- year
- 2015
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
depression · stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- collections
language
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- summary
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitation
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- biteback-school-trial
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- basis
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- source Content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-26220564
- title
- A Web-Based Adolescent Positive Psychology Program in Schools: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Miller LM, Talbot E, Lum A.
- year
- 2015
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/jmir.4329
- pmid
- 26220564
- pmcid
- PMC4705364
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- University of NSW and the Black Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia. [author contact omitted].
- publication Type
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- bite-back-programme
- randomized Study Unit Id
- biteback-school-trial
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Classroom cluster-randomised controlled trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- limitations
- Four high-socioeconomic schools, variable duration/fidelity and unblinded self-report; same programme/registry as community trial but distinct school cohort.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- a2e8dac4b114d87d38da52685ebb90b2d0601c80c4988ff867d8572bca898f70
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:58:32.772772+00:00
- sha256
- f06aa57f7dbe4c1cf6a0de4fc57fd97f4539243fade73386732737401b0ba389
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:58:33.654233+00:00
- sha256
- 50d4d1212e74b0a6278c4e07ae98432a652c7d088ac0c80348f5591cab5b5508
- publication Status
- pmid
- 26220564
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:40.551334+00:00
- pub Types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't · research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 777e1f8524f29d09bda6f7e7d11760986be62ef5627d890450966553d04203c8
- revision
- r1-777e1f8524f2
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- youth-access-connection
- topic Title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- trust Score
- 3
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Six hours of Bite Back over 4–6 weeks versus entertainment websites during class
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- population
- age
- Grades 7–12; mixed secondary-school ages
- age Fit
- younger-overlap
- sample
- Four Australian non-government high schools; exact analysed total requires table reconciliation
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- biteback-school-trial
- trial Registries
ACTRN1261200057831
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Compulsory structured delivery need not reproduce volunteer engagement results; co-design and choice matter. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Independent Excel block allocation; odd extra classes assigned intervention; sustained masking not established.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26220564/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4329 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705364/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC4705364/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2Fjmir.4329
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No superiority for depression, stress or overall symptoms; control alone improved flourishing. Both groups improved some outcomes.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- conditions
depression · stress
- topic Trust Scores
2 · 3
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false