Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2019 · Review / synthesis
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
Recorded limitations
Moderate-to-severe bias common, heterogeneous designs and vote-counted results; publication counts do not equal independent interventions.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Review / synthesis
- assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 89 studies
- population
- age
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 89 studies
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
CRD42018092800
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- doi
- 10.2196/12869
- pmid
- 31333198
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- publication Status
- pmid
- 31333198
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:42.283284+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-3d2c70785131
- source Content Hash
- 3d2c70785131cb57920c9ad6b2699ffc09e26319e459d2a59c1c712df3098795
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2019
- authors
- Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK.
- design
- Review / synthesis
- kind
- Review
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.2196/12869
- pmid
- 31333198
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- limitation
- Moderate-to-severe bias common, heterogeneous designs and vote-counted results; publication counts do not equal independent interventions.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- journal Key
- journalofmedicalinternetresearch
- journal Label
- Journal of medical Internet research
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-31333198
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- authors
- Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK.
- year
- 2019
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/12869
- pmid
- 31333198
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
anxiety · depression
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- matched Text
- Anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- matched Text
- Depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- collections
language
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Review
- design
- Review / synthesis
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- summary
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- limitation
- Moderate-to-severe bias common, heterogeneous designs and vote-counted results; publication counts do not equal independent interventions.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 89 studies
- population
- age
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 89 studies
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
CRD42018092800
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-3d2c70785131
- source Content Hash
- 3d2c70785131cb57920c9ad6b2699ffc09e26319e459d2a59c1c712df3098795
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 31333198
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:42.283284+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- title
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- authors
- Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK.
- year
- 2019
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/12869
- pmid
- 31333198
- pmcid
- PMC6681642
- trial Registries
CRD42018092800
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 89 studies
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- category
- review
- randomization Methods Inspected
- false
- masking
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 1
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- limitations
- Moderate-to-severe bias common, heterogeneous designs and vote-counted results; publication counts do not equal independent interventions.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- ee45b4b71f6048dd3a4a1090f7ac0c9b2ce2e08f870be33558dc0759287699ed
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:20:49.570588+00:00
- sha256
- 0c9b8963489eed26193c2d8c1f34fab7539b2e9dd76134bc8b11c1a877f358df
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:20:50.625345+00:00
- sha256
- 0d259b5cab3894273154ae49af32960362b4eee6ba9d28221820540ad40b0cee
- publication Status
- pmid
- 31333198
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:42.283284+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
youth-pmid-28330831
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 3d2c70785131cb57920c9ad6b2699ffc09e26319e459d2a59c1c712df3098795
- revision
- r1-3d2c70785131
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 3
- id
- language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-31333198
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- authors
- Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK.
- year
- 2019
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/12869
- pmid
- 31333198
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
anxiety · depression
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- matched Text
- Anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- matched Text
- Depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- collections
language
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Review
- design
- Review / synthesis
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- summary
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- limitation
- Moderate-to-severe bias common, heterogeneous designs and vote-counted results; publication counts do not equal independent interventions.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 89 studies
- population
- age
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 89 studies
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
CRD42018092800
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-3d2c70785131
- source Content Hash
- 3d2c70785131cb57920c9ad6b2699ffc09e26319e459d2a59c1c712df3098795
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 31333198
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:42.283284+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-31333198
- title
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- authors
- Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK.
- year
- 2019
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/12869
- pmid
- 31333198
- pmcid
- PMC6681642
- trial Registries
CRD42018092800
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 89 studies
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Systematic review with risk-of-bias assessment
- category
- review
- randomization Methods Inspected
- false
- masking
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 1
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Many digital interventions showed some symptom benefit, but only four studies examined broad campus implementation and half omitted usability outcomes.
- limitations
- Moderate-to-severe bias common, heterogeneous designs and vote-counted results; publication counts do not equal independent interventions.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- ee45b4b71f6048dd3a4a1090f7ac0c9b2ce2e08f870be33558dc0759287699ed
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:20:49.570588+00:00
- sha256
- 0c9b8963489eed26193c2d8c1f34fab7539b2e9dd76134bc8b11c1a877f358df
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:20:50.625345+00:00
- sha256
- 0d259b5cab3894273154ae49af32960362b4eee6ba9d28221820540ad40b0cee
- publication Status
- pmid
- 31333198
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:42.283284+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Systematic Review · Journal Article · Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
youth-pmid-28330831
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 3d2c70785131cb57920c9ad6b2699ffc09e26319e459d2a59c1c712df3098795
- revision
- r1-3d2c70785131
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- youth-access-connection
- topic Title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- trust Score
- 3
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 89 studies
- population
- age
- Higher-education students, no fixed upper age
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 89 studies
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
CRD42018092800
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Include usability, reach and sustained delivery in evaluation, alongside clinical outcomes. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333198/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/12869 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681642/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6681642/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F12869
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- matched Text
- Anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.
- matched Text
- Depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- conditions
anxiety · depression
- topic Trust Scores
3
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false