Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.

Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K. · Frontiers in digital health · 2022 · Qualitative study

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.

Recorded limitations

Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Qualitative study
assessment
category
qualitative
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Qualitative co-design focus groups
masking Roles
Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

review Scope
selected-methods
trust Factor
score
1
display Crosses
1
scope
Paper
status
assessed
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
masking Roles
Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
basis
Qualitative co-design focus groups
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

assessed At
2026-11-02
review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
review Limit
AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Qualitative study
intervention
Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
provider
Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
comparator
See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
sample
24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
population
age
13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
age Fit
mixed-overlap
sample
24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
setting
Not separately established; see population/intervention description
community
Not assigned
measurement
Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
trial Id
moodytunes-development
trial Registries
None recorded
registry Scope
Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
relationship Note
Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
quality
tier
qualified
qualification
Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
false
jadad Score
Not recorded
masking Roles
Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
harms And Attrition
Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

retrieved At
2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:black-dog-youth
    title
    Black Dog Institute · Youth research
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
  2. key
    language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
    title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
  3. key
    language:youth-access-connection
    title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
youth-pmid-36620186
doi
10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
pmid
36620186
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
lab Relevance
relationship
direct-response
implication
Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
transfer Limit
Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
institutions

Black Dog Institute

institution Evidence
  1. institution
    Black Dog Institute
    basis
    Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
    evidence
    Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
research Topics

Youth needs / digital / access

publication Status
pmid
36620186
checked At
2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
pub Types

research-article · Journal Article

indexed Notices
None recorded
crossref Updates
None recorded
notice Records
None recorded
scope
Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
notice Summary
Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
randomized Study Unit Id
Not recorded
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-02
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
source Revision
r1-002614374414
source Content Hash
002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

retrieved At
2026-11-02
study Family Id
moodytunes-development
approaches

Youth needs / digital / access

id
youth-pmid-36620186
aliases
None recorded
title
Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
journal
Frontiers in digital health
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2022
authors
Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
design
Qualitative study
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
pmid
36620186
urls

https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

collections

language

categories

Methods & context

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
limitation
Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
qualitative
is Randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Qualitative co-design focus groups
masking Roles
Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

review Scope
selected-methods
paper Trust Assessment
score
1
display Crosses
1
scope
Paper
status
assessed
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
randomized Controlled Trial
false
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
not-applicable
masking Roles
Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
basis
Qualitative co-design focus groups
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

assessed At
2026-11-02
review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
review Limit
AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:black-dog-youth
    title
    Black Dog Institute · Youth research
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
  2. key
    language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
    title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
  3. key
    language:youth-access-connection
    title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
journal Key
frontiersindigitalhealth
journal Label
Frontiers in digital health
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-black-dog-youth-youth-pmid-36620186
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
    authors
    Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
    year
    2022
    journal
    Frontiers in digital health
    doi
    10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
    pmid
    36620186
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    collections

    language

    categories

    Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    adolescents · youth · adults

    age Population
    record Id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    collections

    language

    groups

    adolescents · youth · adults

    reported Ages
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    None recorded
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Qualitative study
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    summary
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    limitation
    Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Qualitative study
    intervention
    Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    population
    age
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    moodytunes-development
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    qualified
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    qualitative
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    1
    display Crosses
    1
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    basis
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-002614374414
    source Content Hash
    002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    moodytunes-development
    randomized Study Unit Id
    Not recorded
    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    research Topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    36620186
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    source Pages
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    title
    Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
    authors
    Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
    year
    2022
    journal
    Frontiers in digital health
    doi
    10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
    pmid
    36620186
    pmcid
    PMC9810815
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    moodytunes-development
    randomized Study Unit Id
    Not recorded
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    population
    age
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    intervention
    description And Dose
    Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    category
    qualitative
    randomization Methods Inspected
    false
    masking
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    1
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    limitations
    Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      62512fbf32c9fb70c98df9a66f5961d0316d539def8b29c11c4fdb71292f88ad
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:58:55.457289+00:00
      sha256
      88197fe7e10780d63d878b5efbb21d106e1b89a9f460da63a76477185314c1c4
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:58:56.513988+00:00
      sha256
      59be88777edb1a529d2d461544ff4f331ddf232c9fd7c3ef2ba1038cdb007423
    publication Status
    pmid
    36620186
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    qualified
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References

    youth-pmid-32527236

    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
    revision
    r1-002614374414
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    6
    topic Id
    black-dog-youth
    topic Title
    Black Dog Institute · Youth research
    trust Score
    2
  2. id
    language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-36620186
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
    authors
    Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
    year
    2022
    journal
    Frontiers in digital health
    doi
    10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
    pmid
    36620186
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    collections

    language

    categories

    Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    adolescents · youth · adults

    age Population
    record Id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    collections

    language

    groups

    adolescents · youth · adults

    reported Ages
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    None recorded
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Qualitative study
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    summary
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    limitation
    Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Qualitative study
    intervention
    Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    population
    age
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    moodytunes-development
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    qualified
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    qualitative
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    1
    display Crosses
    1
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    basis
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-002614374414
    source Content Hash
    002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    moodytunes-development
    randomized Study Unit Id
    Not recorded
    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    research Topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    36620186
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    source Pages
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    title
    Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
    authors
    Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
    year
    2022
    journal
    Frontiers in digital health
    doi
    10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
    pmid
    36620186
    pmcid
    PMC9810815
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    moodytunes-development
    randomized Study Unit Id
    Not recorded
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    population
    age
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    intervention
    description And Dose
    Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    category
    qualitative
    randomization Methods Inspected
    false
    masking
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    1
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    limitations
    Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      62512fbf32c9fb70c98df9a66f5961d0316d539def8b29c11c4fdb71292f88ad
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:58:55.457289+00:00
      sha256
      88197fe7e10780d63d878b5efbb21d106e1b89a9f460da63a76477185314c1c4
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:58:56.513988+00:00
      sha256
      59be88777edb1a529d2d461544ff4f331ddf232c9fd7c3ef2ba1038cdb007423
    publication Status
    pmid
    36620186
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    qualified
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References

    youth-pmid-32527236

    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
    revision
    r1-002614374414
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    6
    topic Id
    universal-mind-mobile-lab
    topic Title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    trust Score
    3
  3. id
    language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-36620186
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
    authors
    Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
    year
    2022
    journal
    Frontiers in digital health
    doi
    10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
    pmid
    36620186
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    collections

    language

    categories

    Methods & context

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions
    None recorded
    condition Evidence
    None recorded
    age Groups

    adolescents · youth · adults

    age Population
    record Id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    collections

    language

    groups

    adolescents · youth · adults

    reported Ages
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    youth Scope
    included
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    None recorded
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Qualitative study
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    summary
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    limitation
    Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Qualitative study
    intervention
    Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    population
    age
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    moodytunes-development
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    qualified
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    qualitative
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    1
    display Crosses
    1
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    false
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    not-applicable
    masking Roles
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    basis
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    not-applicable
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-002614374414
    source Content Hash
    002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    moodytunes-development
    randomized Study Unit Id
    Not recorded
    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    research Topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    36620186
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    source Pages
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-36620186
    title
    Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want.
    authors
    Garrido S, Oliver E, Chmiel A, Doran B, Boydell K.
    year
    2022
    journal
    Frontiers in digital health
    doi
    10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
    pmid
    36620186
    pmcid
    PMC9810815
    trial Registries
    None recorded
    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
    publication Type

    research-article · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    moodytunes-development
    randomized Study Unit Id
    Not recorded
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    population
    age
    13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
    age Fit
    mixed-overlap
    sample
    24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    intervention
    description And Dose
    Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    Qualitative co-design focus groups
    category
    qualitative
    randomization Methods Inspected
    false
    masking
    Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    1
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    Themes: privacy, user empowerment, and engagement rather than achievement; participants wanted choice about seeking professional help.
    limitations
    Small purposive sample, stated preferences rather than measured app retention or clinical effects; higher-risk young people excluded.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    direct-response
    implication
    Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      62512fbf32c9fb70c98df9a66f5961d0316d539def8b29c11c4fdb71292f88ad
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:58:55.457289+00:00
      sha256
      88197fe7e10780d63d878b5efbb21d106e1b89a9f460da63a76477185314c1c4
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:58:56.513988+00:00
      sha256
      59be88777edb1a529d2d461544ff4f331ddf232c9fd7c3ef2ba1038cdb007423
    publication Status
    pmid
    36620186
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.752914+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    qualified
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References

    youth-pmid-32527236

    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    002614374414004b5ab4ff33f81a8d8cb7038c4f7917ba7270327425bdd89eb8
    revision
    r1-002614374414
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    6
    topic Id
    youth-access-connection
    topic Title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    trust Score
    3
evidence
evidence Type
Qualitative study
intervention
Workshops on MoodyTunes privacy, social features, language and motivation
provider
Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
comparator
See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
sample
24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
population
age
13–25; 14 under 18, 10 aged 18+
age Fit
mixed-overlap
sample
24 in four groups; one screened person excluded/referred
setting
Not separately established; see population/intervention description
community
Not assigned
measurement
Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
trial Id
moodytunes-development
trial Registries
None recorded
registry Scope
Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
relationship Note
Use discreet participation, clear privacy explanations and non-judgmental invitations; reward exploration rather than mental-health performance. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
quality
tier
qualified
qualification
Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
false
jadad Score
Not recorded
masking Roles
Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
harms And Attrition
Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36620186/ · https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1045765 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810815/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9810815/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2022.1045765

retrieved At
2026-11-02
jadad
status
not-applicable
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
None recorded
conditions
None recorded
topic Trust Scores

2 · 3

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library