The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.
Taylor ME, Liu M, Abelson S, Eisenberg D, Lipson SK, Schueller SM. · Current psychiatry reports · 2024 · Review / synthesis
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
Recorded limitations
Vote-counting effective/partly-effective studies is not a pooled causal estimate; broad student age and study-design mix.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Review / synthesis
- assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- population
- age
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- doi
- 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- pmid
- 39392547
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39392547
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.769577+00:00
- pub Types
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-a0c047821919
- source Content Hash
- a0c047821919d959fcfc3a79aa2e73867e5dcce75f389b589b807e4fc18122c4
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.
- journal
- Current psychiatry reports
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2024
- authors
- Taylor ME, Liu M, Abelson S, Eisenberg D, Lipson SK, Schueller SM.
- design
- Review / synthesis
- kind
- Review
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- pmid
- 39392547
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- limitation
- Vote-counting effective/partly-effective studies is not a pooled causal estimate; broad student age and study-design mix.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- journal Key
- currentpsychiatryreports
- journal Label
- Current psychiatry reports
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-39392547
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.
- authors
- Taylor ME, Liu M, Abelson S, Eisenberg D, Lipson SK, Schueller SM.
- year
- 2024
- journal
- Current psychiatry reports
- doi
- 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- pmid
- 39392547
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- collections
language
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Review
- design
- Review / synthesis
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- summary
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- limitation
- Vote-counting effective/partly-effective studies is not a pooled causal estimate; broad student age and study-design mix.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- population
- age
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-a0c047821919
- source Content Hash
- a0c047821919d959fcfc3a79aa2e73867e5dcce75f389b589b807e4fc18122c4
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39392547
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.769577+00:00
- pub Types
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- title
- The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.
- authors
- Taylor ME, Liu M, Abelson S, Eisenberg D, Lipson SK, Schueller SM.
- year
- 2024
- journal
- Current psychiatry reports
- doi
- 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- pmid
- 39392547
- pmcid
- PMC11706926
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- category
- review
- randomization Methods Inspected
- false
- masking
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 1
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- limitations
- Vote-counting effective/partly-effective studies is not a pooled causal estimate; broad student age and study-design mix.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- 9df7b577480b575c1b82a7abcf9897f94bde2e65d32b71ad1d2c100b948bf745
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:19.510171+00:00
- sha256
- a6cc173e105235448f12c75cfd94f09b7d085da156e1c79f5d71d35e68aabbf0
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:20.576113+00:00
- sha256
- 2b94c2752fe0f0407f81fd86214003eca56c45aecf7e2cf0680a4a2496e8f58e
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39392547
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.769577+00:00
- pub Types
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- a0c047821919d959fcfc3a79aa2e73867e5dcce75f389b589b807e4fc18122c4
- revision
- r1-a0c047821919
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 3
- id
- language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-39392547
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.
- authors
- Taylor ME, Liu M, Abelson S, Eisenberg D, Lipson SK, Schueller SM.
- year
- 2024
- journal
- Current psychiatry reports
- doi
- 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- pmid
- 39392547
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- collections
language
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Review
- design
- Review / synthesis
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- summary
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- limitation
- Vote-counting effective/partly-effective studies is not a pooled causal estimate; broad student age and study-design mix.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- population
- age
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-a0c047821919
- source Content Hash
- a0c047821919d959fcfc3a79aa2e73867e5dcce75f389b589b807e4fc18122c4
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39392547
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.769577+00:00
- pub Types
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-39392547
- title
- The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Digital Mental Health Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review.
- authors
- Taylor ME, Liu M, Abelson S, Eisenberg D, Lipson SK, Schueller SM.
- year
- 2024
- journal
- Current psychiatry reports
- doi
- 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- pmid
- 39392547
- pmcid
- PMC11706926
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Systematic implementation review using RE-AIM
- category
- review
- randomization Methods Inspected
- false
- masking
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 1
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Many studies reported some benefit, but reach was skewed toward women/White students, uptake modest and costs/maintenance poorly reported.
- limitations
- Vote-counting effective/partly-effective studies is not a pooled causal estimate; broad student age and study-design mix.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- 9df7b577480b575c1b82a7abcf9897f94bde2e65d32b71ad1d2c100b948bf745
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:19.510171+00:00
- sha256
- a6cc173e105235448f12c75cfd94f09b7d085da156e1c79f5d71d35e68aabbf0
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:20.576113+00:00
- sha256
- 2b94c2752fe0f0407f81fd86214003eca56c45aecf7e2cf0680a4a2496e8f58e
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39392547
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.769577+00:00
- pub Types
Systematic Review · review-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- a0c047821919d959fcfc3a79aa2e73867e5dcce75f389b589b807e4fc18122c4
- revision
- r1-a0c047821919
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- youth-access-connection
- topic Title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- trust Score
- 3
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- population
- age
- Postsecondary students; no youth-only age restriction
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 95 studies published 2019–2024
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- college-digital-reaim-review
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Measure who is reached, excluded, retained and helped, and document actual operating costs. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39392547/ · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706926/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11706926/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11920-024-01545-w
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
3
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false