A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention.
Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW. · Scientific reports · 2025 · Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
Recorded limitations
Small factorial cells and 20% exclusion from recruited sample; multiple parameter comparisons.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Two visits comparing binaural beats and control tones, with randomized frequency, carrier, onset and background-noise factors.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- population
- age
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-39910150
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- sound:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- sound
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- sound:sound-entrainment-youth
- title
- Sound and brain entrainment for youth
- collection
- sound
- trust Score
- 1
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- doi
- 10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- pmid
- 39910150
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- sound
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Sound / brain entrainment
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39910150
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.773661+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-39910150
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-81c6fdbe6a15
- source Content Hash
- 81c6fdbe6a15355a33727d3c222ed2d2e92c21424e6c483faed319d7c3bd80e8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-39910150
- approaches
Sound / brain entrainment
- id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention.
- journal
- Scientific reports
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW.
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- pmid
- 39910150
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- collections
sound
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- limitation
- Small factorial cells and 20% exclusion from recruited sample; multiple parameter comparisons.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- sound
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- sound:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- sound
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- sound:sound-entrainment-youth
- title
- Sound and brain entrainment for youth
- collection
- sound
- trust Score
- 1
- journal Key
- scientificreports
- journal Label
- Scientific reports
- chapter Entries
- id
- sound-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-39910150
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention.
- authors
- Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Scientific reports
- doi
- 10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- pmid
- 39910150
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- collections
sound
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- collections
sound
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- summary
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- limitation
- Small factorial cells and 20% exclusion from recruited sample; multiple parameter comparisons.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Two visits comparing binaural beats and control tones, with randomized frequency, carrier, onset and background-noise factors.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- population
- age
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-39910150
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-81c6fdbe6a15
- source Content Hash
- 81c6fdbe6a15355a33727d3c222ed2d2e92c21424e6c483faed319d7c3bd80e8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-39910150
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-39910150
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Sound / brain entrainment
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39910150
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.773661+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Sound / brain entrainment
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- title
- A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention.
- authors
- Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Scientific reports
- doi
- 10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- pmid
- 39910150
- pmcid
- PMC11799511
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Sound / brain entrainment
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-39910150
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-39910150
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Two visits comparing binaural beats and control tones, with randomized frequency, carrier, onset and background-noise factors.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- randomized-crossover
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- limitations
- Small factorial cells and 20% exclusion from recruited sample; multiple parameter comparisons.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- 9f9d5fd18a37446b39e9542afe62b1eaea835e717c9d88a2aa3c4af8d6675bfb
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:09.255210+00:00
- sha256
- b14c1ac44e31d2e04c9f3aa7c1be1fe1dc9f00042946586711b0543e1fc5ee9e
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:09.258370+00:00
- sha256
- 7a5590ee410453b3f82e2b2ebbb5f99e67038abd24f6749865ac163ba671c5aa
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39910150
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.773661+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 81c6fdbe6a15355a33727d3c222ed2d2e92c21424e6c483faed319d7c3bd80e8
- revision
- r1-81c6fdbe6a15
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- sound
- chapter Number
- 8
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 2
- id
- sound-sound-entrainment-youth-youth-pmid-39910150
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention.
- authors
- Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Scientific reports
- doi
- 10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- pmid
- 39910150
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- collections
sound
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- collections
sound
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- summary
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- limitation
- Small factorial cells and 20% exclusion from recruited sample; multiple parameter comparisons.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Two visits comparing binaural beats and control tones, with randomized frequency, carrier, onset and background-noise factors.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- population
- age
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-39910150
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- basis
- randomized-crossover
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-81c6fdbe6a15
- source Content Hash
- 81c6fdbe6a15355a33727d3c222ed2d2e92c21424e6c483faed319d7c3bd80e8
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-39910150
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-39910150
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Sound / brain entrainment
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39910150
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.773661+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Sound / brain entrainment
- record Id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-39910150
- title
- A parametric investigation of binaural beats for brain entrainment and enhancing sustained attention.
- authors
- Melnichuk A, Cooper RK, Hawk LW.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Scientific reports
- doi
- 10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- pmid
- 39910150
- pmcid
- PMC11799511
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Sound / brain entrainment
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-39910150
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-39910150
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Two visits comparing binaural beats and control tones, with randomized frequency, carrier, onset and background-noise factors.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- randomized-crossover
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- limitations
- Small factorial cells and 20% exclusion from recruited sample; multiple parameter comparisons.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- 9f9d5fd18a37446b39e9542afe62b1eaea835e717c9d88a2aa3c4af8d6675bfb
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:09.255210+00:00
- sha256
- b14c1ac44e31d2e04c9f3aa7c1be1fe1dc9f00042946586711b0543e1fc5ee9e
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:09.258370+00:00
- sha256
- 7a5590ee410453b3f82e2b2ebbb5f99e67038abd24f6749865ac163ba671c5aa
- publication Status
- pmid
- 39910150
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.773661+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 81c6fdbe6a15355a33727d3c222ed2d2e92c21424e6c483faed319d7c3bd80e8
- revision
- r1-81c6fdbe6a15
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- sound
- chapter Number
- 8
- topic Id
- sound-entrainment-youth
- topic Title
- Sound and brain entrainment for youth
- trust Score
- 1
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Two visits comparing binaural beats and control tones, with randomized frequency, carrier, onset and background-noise factors.
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- population
- age
- Undergraduates; analyzed sample mean age 19.
- age Fit
- target-centred
- sample
- 80 recruited; 64 analyzed after 12 missing second visits and four performance exclusions.
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-39910150
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Can inform experimental sound parameters and attention tasks; does not justify a wellbeing promise. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- participants
- Beat hypothesis withheld until completion; masking success untested
- providers
- Not established
- assessors
- Not established
- analysts
- Not established
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910150/ · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88517-z · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799511/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11799511/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1038%2Fs41598-025-88517-z
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- Some gamma-beat settings improved overall task performance and produced EEG responses, but did not reduce deterioration of vigilance over time. This is a laboratory cognition finding, not a clinical stress trial.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- conditions
stress
- topic Trust Scores
2 · 1
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false