Universal Informatics · Research reading room

Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.

Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H. · BMJ mental health · 2025 · Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified

Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication

Recorded summary

No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.

Recorded limitations

Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.

Evidence and provenance

Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.

Study design and assessment
design
Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
assessment
category
single-blind-rct
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
masking Roles
Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

review Scope
selected-methods
trust Factor
score
2
display Crosses
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
single
masking Roles
Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
basis
Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

assessed At
2026-11-02
review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
review Limit
AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
evidence
evidence Type
Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
intervention
School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
provider
Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
comparator
See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
sample
6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
population
age
Year 8; 13–14
age Fit
broader-institution-youth
sample
6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
setting
Not separately established; see population/intervention description
community
Not assigned
measurement
Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
trial Id
publication-40086808
trial Registries

ACTRN12619000855123

registry Scope
Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
relationship Note
Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
quality
tier
priority
qualification
Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
false
jadad Score
Not recorded
masking Roles
Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
harms And Attrition
Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

retrieved At
2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
  1. key
    language:black-dog-youth
    title
    Black Dog Institute · Youth research
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
  2. key
    language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
    title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
  3. key
    language:youth-access-connection
    title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
id
youth-pmid-40086808
doi
10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
pmid
40086808
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
Complete approved library record
lab Relevance
relationship
limits
implication
Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
transfer Limit
Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
institutions

Black Dog Institute

institution Evidence
  1. institution
    Black Dog Institute
    basis
    Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
    evidence
    Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
research Topics

Youth needs / digital / access

publication Status
pmid
40086808
checked At
2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
pub Types

research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

indexed Notices
None recorded
crossref Updates
None recorded
notice Records
None recorded
scope
Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
notice Summary
Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
randomized Study Unit Id
publication-40086808
publication Approval
status
approved-for-publication
approved By
Ben Korbel
approved At
2026-11-02
assessment
AI assessed; human approved for publication
scope
Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
source Revision
r1-85405a6f6b43
source Content Hash
85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

retrieved At
2026-11-02
study Family Id
publication-40086808
approaches

Youth needs / digital / access

id
youth-pmid-40086808
aliases
None recorded
title
Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
journal
BMJ mental health
neurotransmitters
None recorded
year
2025
authors
Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
design
Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
kind
Journal article
identity Conflict
Not recorded
doi
10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
pmid
40086808
urls

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

collections

language

categories

Clinical & self-report

targets
None recorded
priority
1
quotes
None recorded
summary
No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
limitation
Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
citation Count
Not recorded
citation Snapshot
count
Not recorded
source
Not recorded
retrieved At
Not recorded
status
not-assessed
study Design Assessment
category
single-blind-rct
is Randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
basis
Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
masking Roles
Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

review Scope
selected-methods
paper Trust Assessment
score
2
display Crosses
2
scope
Paper
status
assessed
rating Scale
library-trust-factor/1-3
randomized Controlled Trial
true
peer Reviewed
true
blinding
single
masking Roles
Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
basis
Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
sources

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

assessed At
2026-11-02
review Scope
selected-methods
human Approval
false
review Limit
AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
citations By Collection
language
Not recorded
topics
  1. key
    language:black-dog-youth
    title
    Black Dog Institute · Youth research
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    2
  2. key
    language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
    title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
  3. key
    language:youth-access-connection
    title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    collection
    language
    trust Score
    3
journal Key
bmjmentalhealth
journal Label
BMJ mental health
chapter Entries
  1. id
    language-black-dog-youth-youth-pmid-40086808
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
    authors
    Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
    year
    2025
    journal
    BMJ mental health
    doi
    10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
    pmid
    40086808
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    anxiety · depression · sleep

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      anxiety
      evidence
      1. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        anxiety
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      depression
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
        matched Text
        depression
      2. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        depression
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    3. id
      sleep
      evidence
      1. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        insomnia
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    collections

    language

    groups

    adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Year 8; 13–14
    youth Scope
    focus
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    None recorded
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    summary
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    limitation
    Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
    intervention
    School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    population
    age
    Year 8; 13–14
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-40086808
    trial Registries

    ACTRN12619000855123

    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    single-blind-rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    single
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    basis
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-85405a6f6b43
    source Content Hash
    85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-40086808
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-40086808
    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
    research Topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    limits
    implication
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    40086808
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    source Pages
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    title
    Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
    authors
    Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
    year
    2025
    journal
    BMJ mental health
    doi
    10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
    pmid
    40086808
    pmcid
    PMC11927416
    trial Registries

    ACTRN12619000855123

    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
    publication Type

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-40086808
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-40086808
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    population
    age
    Year 8; 13–14
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    intervention
    description And Dose
    School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    limitations
    Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    limits
    implication
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      aff4030782251bbf487840c7661df1f3d3e552d1b62cf427f13a01c2114d06ce
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:11.618438+00:00
      sha256
      1a6a563be92192acb2bbb39207e101d856f36c04355766f9ddecfb659e1dc5b6
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:12.909025+00:00
      sha256
      b5976835710a16cbf8eb5bca7be0833a9cbfb26776e77e3169cf55cc6853de13
    publication Status
    pmid
    40086808
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
    revision
    r1-85405a6f6b43
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    6
    topic Id
    black-dog-youth
    topic Title
    Black Dog Institute · Youth research
    trust Score
    2
  2. id
    language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-40086808
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
    authors
    Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
    year
    2025
    journal
    BMJ mental health
    doi
    10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
    pmid
    40086808
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    anxiety · depression · sleep

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      anxiety
      evidence
      1. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        anxiety
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      depression
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
        matched Text
        depression
      2. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        depression
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    3. id
      sleep
      evidence
      1. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        insomnia
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    collections

    language

    groups

    adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Year 8; 13–14
    youth Scope
    focus
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    None recorded
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    summary
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    limitation
    Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
    intervention
    School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    population
    age
    Year 8; 13–14
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-40086808
    trial Registries

    ACTRN12619000855123

    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    single-blind-rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    single
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    basis
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-85405a6f6b43
    source Content Hash
    85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-40086808
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-40086808
    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
    research Topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    limits
    implication
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    40086808
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    source Pages
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    title
    Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
    authors
    Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
    year
    2025
    journal
    BMJ mental health
    doi
    10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
    pmid
    40086808
    pmcid
    PMC11927416
    trial Registries

    ACTRN12619000855123

    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
    publication Type

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-40086808
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-40086808
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    population
    age
    Year 8; 13–14
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    intervention
    description And Dose
    School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    limitations
    Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    limits
    implication
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      aff4030782251bbf487840c7661df1f3d3e552d1b62cf427f13a01c2114d06ce
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:11.618438+00:00
      sha256
      1a6a563be92192acb2bbb39207e101d856f36c04355766f9ddecfb659e1dc5b6
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:12.909025+00:00
      sha256
      b5976835710a16cbf8eb5bca7be0833a9cbfb26776e77e3169cf55cc6853de13
    publication Status
    pmid
    40086808
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
    revision
    r1-85405a6f6b43
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    6
    topic Id
    universal-mind-mobile-lab
    topic Title
    Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
    trust Score
    3
  3. id
    language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-40086808
    aliases
    None recorded
    title
    Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
    authors
    Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
    year
    2025
    journal
    BMJ mental health
    doi
    10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
    pmid
    40086808
    urls

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    collections

    language

    categories

    Clinical & self-report

    targets
    None recorded
    neurotransmitters
    None recorded
    conditions

    anxiety · depression · sleep

    condition Evidence
    1. id
      anxiety
      evidence
      1. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        anxiety
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    2. id
      depression
      evidence
      1. field
        title
        text
        Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
        matched Text
        depression
      2. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        depression
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    3. id
      sleep
      evidence
      1. field
        findings
        text
        No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
        matched Text
        insomnia
      scope
      Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
    age Groups

    adolescents · youth

    age Population
    record Id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    collections

    language

    groups

    adolescents · youth

    reported Ages
    Year 8; 13–14
    youth Scope
    focus
    youth Source Note
    The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    source URL
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
    basis Type
    selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
    classification Note
    Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
    community Matches
    None recorded
    kind
    Journal article
    design
    Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
    origin
    approved-youth-20261102
    priority
    1
    quotes
    None recorded
    finding
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    summary
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    limitation
    Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
    evidence
    evidence Type
    Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
    intervention
    School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    population
    age
    Year 8; 13–14
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    measurement
    Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
    trial Id
    publication-40086808
    trial Registries

    ACTRN12619000855123

    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    relationship Note
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    measured Genes
    None recorded
    pathways
    None recorded
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Design Assessment
    category
    single-blind-rct
    is Randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    basis
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    review Scope
    selected-methods
    paper Trust Assessment
    score
    2
    display Crosses
    2
    scope
    Paper
    status
    assessed
    rating Scale
    library-trust-factor/1-3
    randomized Controlled Trial
    true
    peer Reviewed
    true
    blinding
    single
    masking Roles
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    basis
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    sources

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    assessed At
    2026-11-02
    review Scope
    selected-methods
    human Approval
    false
    review Limit
    AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
    jadad
    status
    unassessed
    score
    Not recorded
    citation Count
    Not recorded
    citation Snapshot
    count
    Not recorded
    source
    Not recorded
    retrieved At
    Not recorded
    status
    not-assessed
    publication Approval
    status
    approved-for-publication
    approved By
    Ben Korbel
    approved At
    2026-11-02
    assessment
    AI assessed; human approved for publication
    scope
    Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
    source Revision
    r1-85405a6f6b43
    source Content Hash
    85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    level
    selected-methods
    source URLs

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

    retrieved At
    2026-11-02
    study Family Id
    publication-40086808
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-40086808
    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
    research Topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    lab Relevance
    relationship
    limits
    implication
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    publication Status
    pmid
    40086808
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    approaches

    Youth needs / digital / access

    record Id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    source Pages
    None recorded
    assessment Record
    id
    youth-pmid-40086808
    title
    Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
    authors
    Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
    year
    2025
    journal
    BMJ mental health
    doi
    10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
    pmid
    40086808
    pmcid
    PMC11927416
    trial Registries

    ACTRN12619000855123

    registry Scope
    Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
    collection
    youth-20261102
    topics

    Youth needs / digital / access

    institutions

    Black Dog Institute

    institution Evidence
    1. institution
      Black Dog Institute
      basis
      Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
      evidence
      Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
    publication Type

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    study Family Id
    publication-40086808
    randomized Study Unit Id
    publication-40086808
    existing Repository Matches
    None recorded
    population
    age
    Year 8; 13–14
    age Fit
    broader-institution-youth
    sample
    6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
    setting
    Not separately established; see population/intervention description
    community
    Not assigned
    intervention
    description And Dose
    School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
    provider
    Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
    comparator
    See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
    design
    description
    Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
    category
    randomized-report
    randomization Methods Inspected
    true
    masking
    Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
    double Blinding Verified
    false
    proposed Crosses
    2
    approved Crosses
    Not recorded
    findings
    No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
    limitations
    Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
    harms And Attrition
    Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
    lab Relevance
    relationship
    limits
    implication
    Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
    transfer Limit
    Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
    source Access
    scope
    selected-methods
    full Text Cached
    true
    methods Inspected
    true
    full Text Appraisal Claim
    false
    sources
    1. type
      primary bibliographic record
      url
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      sha256
      aff4030782251bbf487840c7661df1f3d3e552d1b62cf427f13a01c2114d06ce
      hash Scope
      normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
    2. type
      publisher DOI
      url
      https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
    3. type
      PMC article
      url
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02
      access
      Full text cached
    4. type
      full-text-xml
      url
      https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:11.618438+00:00
      sha256
      1a6a563be92192acb2bbb39207e101d856f36c04355766f9ddecfb659e1dc5b6
    5. type
      DOI-metadata
      url
      https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
      retrieved At
      2026-11-02T00:59:12.909025+00:00
      sha256
      b5976835710a16cbf8eb5bca7be0833a9cbfb26776e77e3169cf55cc6853de13
    publication Status
    pmid
    40086808
    checked At
    2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
    pub Types

    research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article

    indexed Notices
    None recorded
    crossref Updates
    None recorded
    notice Records
    None recorded
    scope
    Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
    notice Summary
    Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
    quality
    tier
    priority
    qualification
    Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
    formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
    false
    jadad Score
    Not recorded
    review Ready
    true
    hold Reason
    Not recorded
    duplicate Of
    Not recorded
    review
    status
    pending
    reviewer
    Not recorded
    approved At
    Not recorded
    decision Scope
    Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
    provenance
    Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
    production Eligible
    false
    approved Retrieval Eligible
    false
    selected Corpus References
    None recorded
    reference Scope
    Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
    content Hash
    85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
    revision
    r1-85405a6f6b43
    archive Entries
    None recorded
    collection
    language
    chapter Number
    6
    topic Id
    youth-access-connection
    topic Title
    Youth access, digital support and connection
    trust Score
    3
evidence
evidence Type
Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
intervention
School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
provider
Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
comparator
See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
sample
6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
population
age
Year 8; 13–14
age Fit
broader-institution-youth
sample
6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
setting
Not separately established; see population/intervention description
community
Not assigned
measurement
Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
trial Id
publication-40086808
trial Registries

ACTRN12619000855123

registry Scope
Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
relationship Note
Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
measured Genes
None recorded
pathways
None recorded
quality
tier
priority
qualification
Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
false
jadad Score
Not recorded
masking Roles
Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
harms And Attrition
Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
source Access
scope
selected-methods
full Text Cached
true
methods Inspected
true
full Text Appraisal Claim
false
level
selected-methods
source URLs

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426

retrieved At
2026-11-02
jadad
status
unassessed
score
Not recorded
condition Evidence
  1. id
    anxiety
    evidence
    1. field
      findings
      text
      No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
      matched Text
      anxiety
    scope
    Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
  2. id
    depression
    evidence
    1. field
      title
      text
      Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
      matched Text
      depression
    2. field
      findings
      text
      No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
      matched Text
      depression
    scope
    Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
  3. id
    sleep
    evidence
    1. field
      findings
      text
      No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
      matched Text
      insomnia
    scope
    Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
conditions

anxiety · depression · sleep

topic Trust Scores

2 · 3

full Text
status
not-indexed
retrieval Available
false

Open this publication in the interactive library