Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H. · BMJ mental health · 2025 · Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
Recorded limitations
Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- assessment
- category
- single-blind-rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- single
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- intervention
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40086808
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:black-dog-youth
- title
- Black Dog Institute · Youth research
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- source Content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitation
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- single-blind-rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- single
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:black-dog-youth
- title
- Black Dog Institute · Youth research
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- journal Key
- bmjmentalhealth
- journal Label
- BMJ mental health
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-black-dog-youth-youth-pmid-40086808
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
anxiety · depression · sleep
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- matched Text
- depression
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- sleep
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- insomnia
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- collections
language
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- Year 8; 13–14
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- summary
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitation
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- intervention
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40086808
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- single-blind-rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- single
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- source Content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- pmcid
- PMC11927416
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitations
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- aff4030782251bbf487840c7661df1f3d3e552d1b62cf427f13a01c2114d06ce
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:11.618438+00:00
- sha256
- 1a6a563be92192acb2bbb39207e101d856f36c04355766f9ddecfb659e1dc5b6
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.909025+00:00
- sha256
- b5976835710a16cbf8eb5bca7be0833a9cbfb26776e77e3169cf55cc6853de13
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- black-dog-youth
- topic Title
- Black Dog Institute · Youth research
- trust Score
- 2
- id
- language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-40086808
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
anxiety · depression · sleep
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- matched Text
- depression
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- sleep
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- insomnia
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- collections
language
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- Year 8; 13–14
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- summary
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitation
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- intervention
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40086808
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- single-blind-rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- single
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- source Content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- pmcid
- PMC11927416
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitations
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- aff4030782251bbf487840c7661df1f3d3e552d1b62cf427f13a01c2114d06ce
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:11.618438+00:00
- sha256
- 1a6a563be92192acb2bbb39207e101d856f36c04355766f9ddecfb659e1dc5b6
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.909025+00:00
- sha256
- b5976835710a16cbf8eb5bca7be0833a9cbfb26776e77e3169cf55cc6853de13
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 3
- id
- language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-40086808
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
anxiety · depression · sleep
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- matched Text
- depression
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- sleep
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- insomnia
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
adolescents · youth
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- collections
language
- groups
adolescents · youth
- reported Ages
- Year 8; 13–14
- youth Scope
- focus
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- summary
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitation
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- intervention
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40086808
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- single-blind-rct
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- single
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- basis
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- source Content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40086808
- title
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- authors
- Werner-Seidler A, Mackinnon A, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Larsen ME, Torok M, O'Dea B, Maston K, Huckvale K, Fujimoto H, Johnston L, Brown L, Batholomew A, Bal D, Beames JR, Skinner SR, Boydell KM, Schweizer S, Lingam R, Perry Y, Hudson JL, Oei JL, Steinbeck K, Teesson M, Venkatesh S, Christensen H.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- BMJ mental health
- doi
- 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- pmid
- 40086808
- pmcid
- PMC11927416
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
Black Dog Institute
- institution Evidence
- institution
- Black Dog Institute
- basis
- Author affiliation in primary indexed metadata or publisher full text
- evidence
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia [author contact omitted].
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40086808
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-40086808
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Large single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- limitations
- Implementation and engagement variable; pandemic school withdrawals; younger age. Null effectiveness is still relevant when planning scale-up.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- limits
- implication
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- aff4030782251bbf487840c7661df1f3d3e552d1b62cf427f13a01c2114d06ce
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:11.618438+00:00
- sha256
- 1a6a563be92192acb2bbb39207e101d856f36c04355766f9ddecfb659e1dc5b6
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T00:59:12.909025+00:00
- sha256
- b5976835710a16cbf8eb5bca7be0833a9cbfb26776e77e3169cf55cc6853de13
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40086808
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.774979+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 85405a6f6b43955e3fae747eda50f70a3445b2c1fb3467893c3b0b7f2a009bda
- revision
- r1-85405a6f6b43
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- youth-access-connection
- topic Title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- trust Score
- 3
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · single masked role verified
- intervention
- School-delivered SPARX digital CBT; 12-month primary endpoint
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- population
- age
- Year 8; 13–14
- age Fit
- broader-institution-youth
- sample
- 6,388 baseline students; 134 participating schools
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40086808
- trial Registries
ACTRN12619000855123
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Demonstrate implementation and actual benefit before expanding a digital programme; availability is not effectiveness. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- priority
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Stratified computer school allocation; investigators/statistician masked, schools could infer condition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086808/ · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301426 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927416/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11927416/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1136%2Fbmjment-2024-301426
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- id
- anxiety
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- anxiety
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- depression
- evidence
- field
- title
- text
- Future Proofing Study: a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a universal school-based cognitive-behavioural programme for adolescent depression.
- matched Text
- depression
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- depression
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- id
- sleep
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- No depression difference at 12 months: −0.05 (95% CI −0.36 to 0.23); no secondary anxiety/distress/insomnia benefit. Completion 22%.
- matched Text
- insomnia
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- conditions
anxiety · depression · sleep
- topic Trust Scores
2 · 3
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false