The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.
McGovern Ó, Glennon S, Walsh I, Gallagher P, McCashin D. · Internet interventions · 2025 · Review / synthesis
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
Recorded limitations
Methods/reporting synthesis rather than an effectiveness trial; no paper met all ten reporting criteria.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Review / synthesis
- assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 papers
- population
- age
- Young people up to 25
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 papers
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40521225
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- doi
- 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- pmid
- 40521225
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40521225
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.777828+00:00
- pub Types
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-e557874466ae
- source Content Hash
- e557874466ae867251239b799fc565a6d111f7eb12440764b59adf6172ea70ee
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40521225
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.
- journal
- Internet interventions
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2025
- authors
- McGovern Ó, Glennon S, Walsh I, Gallagher P, McCashin D.
- design
- Review / synthesis
- kind
- Review
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- pmid
- 40521225
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- limitation
- Methods/reporting synthesis rather than an effectiveness trial; no paper met all ten reporting criteria.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:youth-access-connection
- title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- journal Key
- internetinterventions
- journal Label
- Internet interventions
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-40521225
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.
- authors
- McGovern Ó, Glennon S, Walsh I, Gallagher P, McCashin D.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Internet interventions
- doi
- 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- pmid
- 40521225
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
children · adolescents · youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- collections
language
- groups
children · adolescents · youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Young people up to 25
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Review
- design
- Review / synthesis
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- summary
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- limitation
- Methods/reporting synthesis rather than an effectiveness trial; no paper met all ten reporting criteria.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 papers
- population
- age
- Young people up to 25
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 papers
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40521225
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-e557874466ae
- source Content Hash
- e557874466ae867251239b799fc565a6d111f7eb12440764b59adf6172ea70ee
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40521225
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40521225
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.777828+00:00
- pub Types
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- title
- The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.
- authors
- McGovern Ó, Glennon S, Walsh I, Gallagher P, McCashin D.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Internet interventions
- doi
- 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- pmid
- 40521225
- pmcid
- PMC12163163
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40521225
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Young people up to 25
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 papers
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- category
- review
- randomization Methods Inspected
- false
- masking
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 1
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- limitations
- Methods/reporting synthesis rather than an effectiveness trial; no paper met all ten reporting criteria.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- f89e1412d76ba487eeb9af26b4c42e9beaf68c06fa12dec3b3a5fe0c14fa3d1f
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:24.815029+00:00
- sha256
- 37d73350c207e1cc18c0b5918ba3c32508985a8a1a1c5803a9e94c20d0fba5b5
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:26.104189+00:00
- sha256
- a047b05675143c3622727324f75eac95f813ce36b956beaa6d1a97ca73dc288d
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40521225
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.777828+00:00
- pub Types
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- e557874466ae867251239b799fc565a6d111f7eb12440764b59adf6172ea70ee
- revision
- r1-e557874466ae
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 3
- id
- language-youth-access-connection-youth-pmid-40521225
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.
- authors
- McGovern Ó, Glennon S, Walsh I, Gallagher P, McCashin D.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Internet interventions
- doi
- 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- pmid
- 40521225
- urls
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- collections
language
- categories
Methods & context
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- age Groups
children · adolescents · youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- collections
language
- groups
children · adolescents · youth · adults
- reported Ages
- Young people up to 25
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Review
- design
- Review / synthesis
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- summary
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- limitation
- Methods/reporting synthesis rather than an effectiveness trial; no paper met all ten reporting criteria.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 papers
- population
- age
- Young people up to 25
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 papers
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40521225
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- review
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 1
- display Crosses
- 1
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- false
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-applicable
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- basis
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-e557874466ae
- source Content Hash
- e557874466ae867251239b799fc565a6d111f7eb12440764b59adf6172ea70ee
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-40521225
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40521225
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.777828+00:00
- pub Types
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Youth needs / digital / access
- record Id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-40521225
- title
- The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.
- authors
- McGovern Ó, Glennon S, Walsh I, Gallagher P, McCashin D.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Internet interventions
- doi
- 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- pmid
- 40521225
- pmcid
- PMC12163163
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Youth needs / digital / access
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-40521225
- randomized Study Unit Id
- Not recorded
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- Young people up to 25
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 papers
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Systematic review of co-design methods
- category
- review
- randomization Methods Inspected
- false
- masking
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 1
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Youth involvement and terminology varied; power dynamics and reporting were often inadequate.
- limitations
- Methods/reporting synthesis rather than an effectiveness trial; no paper met all ten reporting criteria.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- direct-response
- implication
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- f89e1412d76ba487eeb9af26b4c42e9beaf68c06fa12dec3b3a5fe0c14fa3d1f
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:24.815029+00:00
- sha256
- 37d73350c207e1cc18c0b5918ba3c32508985a8a1a1c5803a9e94c20d0fba5b5
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:26.104189+00:00
- sha256
- a047b05675143c3622727324f75eac95f813ce36b956beaa6d1a97ca73dc288d
- publication Status
- pmid
- 40521225
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.777828+00:00
- pub Types
review-article · Review · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
- None recorded
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- e557874466ae867251239b799fc565a6d111f7eb12440764b59adf6172ea70ee
- revision
- r1-e557874466ae
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- youth-access-connection
- topic Title
- Youth access, digital support and connection
- trust Score
- 3
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Review / synthesis
- intervention
- Not applicable or not established from inspected sections
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 30 papers
- population
- age
- Young people up to 25
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 30 papers
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-40521225
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Give young people defined decision rights, accessible participation and feedback on how their input changes the lab and portal. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Not applicable or not established from inspected methods; no masking inferred
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40521225/ · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163163/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12163163/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.invent.2025.100835
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- not-applicable
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- None recorded
- conditions
- None recorded
- topic Trust Scores
3
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false