Web-Based Formal Versus Informal Mindfulness Programs for University Students With and Those Without Recent Self-Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Petrovic J, Mettler J, Böke BN, Rogers MA, Hamza CA, Bloom E, Di Genova L, Romano V, Heath NL. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2025 · Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication · Original publication
Recorded summary
Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
Recorded limitations
22.5% attrition favoured control, predominantly women, inactive comparator and no evidence of reduced self-injury. Trained facilitators and harm-reduction procedures matter.
Evidence and provenance
Chapter Trust Factor uses a minimum of three distinct qualifying studies. Publication records retain their own evidence and assessment.
Study design and assessment
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- trust Factor
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Four weekly one-hour online formal or informal mindfulness groups versus inactive control
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- population
- age
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-41313154
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
Topics and recorded topic scores
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:mindfulness-youth
- title
- Mindfulness for youth
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
Citation snapshot and identifiers
- id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- doi
- 10.2196/70011
- pmid
- 41313154
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
Complete approved library record
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Mindfulness
- publication Status
- pmid
- 41313154
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.783592+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-41313154
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-9e3c7f2cf951
- source Content Hash
- 9e3c7f2cf951a3622e1d7e27e193a87aad4526938ec66b1120a36e4dc85788e5
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-41313154
- approaches
Mindfulness
- id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Web-Based Formal Versus Informal Mindfulness Programs for University Students With and Those Without Recent Self-Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- year
- 2025
- authors
- Petrovic J, Mettler J, Böke BN, Rogers MA, Hamza CA, Bloom E, Di Genova L, Romano V, Heath NL.
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- kind
- Journal article
- identity Conflict
- Not recorded
- doi
- 10.2196/70011
- pmid
- 41313154
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- summary
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- limitation
- 22.5% attrition favoured control, predominantly women, inactive comparator and no evidence of reduced self-injury. Trained facilitators and harm-reduction procedures matter.
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- citations By Collection
- language
- Not recorded
- topics
- key
- language:universal-mind-mobile-lab
- title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 3
- key
- language:mindfulness-youth
- title
- Mindfulness for youth
- collection
- language
- trust Score
- 2
- journal Key
- journalofmedicalinternetresearch
- journal Label
- Journal of medical Internet research
- chapter Entries
- id
- language-universal-mind-mobile-lab-youth-pmid-41313154
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Web-Based Formal Versus Informal Mindfulness Programs for University Students With and Those Without Recent Self-Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Petrovic J, Mettler J, Böke BN, Rogers MA, Hamza CA, Bloom E, Di Genova L, Romano V, Heath NL.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/70011
- pmid
- 41313154
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- collections
language
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- summary
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- limitation
- 22.5% attrition favoured control, predominantly women, inactive comparator and no evidence of reduced self-injury. Trained facilitators and harm-reduction procedures matter.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Four weekly one-hour online formal or informal mindfulness groups versus inactive control
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- population
- age
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-41313154
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-9e3c7f2cf951
- source Content Hash
- 9e3c7f2cf951a3622e1d7e27e193a87aad4526938ec66b1120a36e4dc85788e5
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-41313154
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-41313154
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Mindfulness
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 41313154
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.783592+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Mindfulness
- record Id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- title
- Web-Based Formal Versus Informal Mindfulness Programs for University Students With and Those Without Recent Self-Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Petrovic J, Mettler J, Böke BN, Rogers MA, Hamza CA, Bloom E, Di Genova L, Romano V, Heath NL.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/70011
- pmid
- 41313154
- pmcid
- PMC12661606
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Mindfulness
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-41313154
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-41313154
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Four weekly one-hour online formal or informal mindfulness groups versus inactive control
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Three-arm randomized trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- limitations
- 22.5% attrition favoured control, predominantly women, inactive comparator and no evidence of reduced self-injury. Trained facilitators and harm-reduction procedures matter.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- 83282780b77af578d69a78aa23cb1cf1ce0778056ea08f53de4323d13132ae1b
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:31.947242+00:00
- sha256
- e1483e71a3d91a4d8774d0522886c575aa1924eb5ec2c8c1cd8a51146332fa3d
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:33.023710+00:00
- sha256
- b58b156bc1152eea42a0b70007e0016b1887b86fa11eb1ee73979b1113c53f7c
- publication Status
- pmid
- 41313154
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.783592+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
youth-pmid-36596239 · youth-pmid-36844353
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 9e3c7f2cf951a3622e1d7e27e193a87aad4526938ec66b1120a36e4dc85788e5
- revision
- r1-9e3c7f2cf951
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- universal-mind-mobile-lab
- topic Title
- Universal Mind Mobile Lab · Direct response and inspired by
- trust Score
- 3
- id
- language-mindfulness-youth-youth-pmid-41313154
- aliases
- None recorded
- title
- Web-Based Formal Versus Informal Mindfulness Programs for University Students With and Those Without Recent Self-Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Petrovic J, Mettler J, Böke BN, Rogers MA, Hamza CA, Bloom E, Di Genova L, Romano V, Heath NL.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/70011
- pmid
- 41313154
- urls
https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- collections
language
- categories
Clinical & self-report
- targets
- None recorded
- neurotransmitters
- None recorded
- conditions
stress
- condition Evidence
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- age Groups
youth · adults
- age Population
- record Id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- collections
language
- groups
youth · adults
- reported Ages
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- youth Scope
- included
- youth Source Note
- The existing youth filter includes adolescents and source-defined young people. It does not establish a separate 16–24 estimate.
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- source URL
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/
- basis Type
- selected-methods-ai-editorial-assessment
- classification Note
- Broad groups describe source-reported populations or review scope. Eligibility and study mean ages are not observed participant ranges; read the reported-age wording.
- community Matches
- None recorded
- kind
- Journal article
- design
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- origin
- approved-youth-20261102
- priority
- 1
- quotes
- None recorded
- finding
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- summary
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- limitation
- 22.5% attrition favoured control, predominantly women, inactive comparator and no evidence of reduced self-injury. Trained facilitators and harm-reduction procedures matter.
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Four weekly one-hour online formal or informal mindfulness groups versus inactive control
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- population
- age
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-41313154
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Design Assessment
- category
- rct-masking-unclear
- is Randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- paper Trust Assessment
- score
- 2
- display Crosses
- 2
- scope
- Paper
- status
- assessed
- rating Scale
- library-trust-factor/1-3
- randomized Controlled Trial
- true
- peer Reviewed
- true
- blinding
- not-confirmed
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- basis
- Three-arm randomized trial
- sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- assessed At
- 2026-11-02
- review Scope
- selected-methods
- human Approval
- false
- review Limit
- AI source-based design assessment; human content sign-off is recorded separately.
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- citation Count
- Not recorded
- citation Snapshot
- count
- Not recorded
- source
- Not recorded
- retrieved At
- Not recorded
- status
- not-assessed
- publication Approval
- status
- approved-for-publication
- approved By
- Ben Korbel
- approved At
- 2026-11-02
- assessment
- AI assessed; human approved for publication
- scope
- Approved research summaries for Informatics staging. No clinical peer review, treatment recommendation, partner endorsement or production release is claimed.
- source Revision
- r1-9e3c7f2cf951
- source Content Hash
- 9e3c7f2cf951a3622e1d7e27e193a87aad4526938ec66b1120a36e4dc85788e5
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- study Family Id
- publication-41313154
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-41313154
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- research Topics
Mindfulness
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- publication Status
- pmid
- 41313154
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.783592+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- approaches
Mindfulness
- record Id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- source Pages
- None recorded
- assessment Record
- id
- youth-pmid-41313154
- title
- Web-Based Formal Versus Informal Mindfulness Programs for University Students With and Those Without Recent Self-Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.
- authors
- Petrovic J, Mettler J, Böke BN, Rogers MA, Hamza CA, Bloom E, Di Genova L, Romano V, Heath NL.
- year
- 2025
- journal
- Journal of medical Internet research
- doi
- 10.2196/70011
- pmid
- 41313154
- pmcid
- PMC12661606
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- collection
- youth-20261102
- topics
Mindfulness
- institutions
- None recorded
- institution Evidence
- None recorded
- publication Type
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- study Family Id
- publication-41313154
- randomized Study Unit Id
- publication-41313154
- existing Repository Matches
- None recorded
- population
- age
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- intervention
- description And Dose
- Four weekly one-hour online formal or informal mindfulness groups versus inactive control
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- design
- description
- Three-arm randomized trial
- category
- randomized-report
- randomization Methods Inspected
- true
- masking
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- double Blinding Verified
- false
- proposed Crosses
- 2
- approved Crosses
- Not recorded
- findings
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- limitations
- 22.5% attrition favoured control, predominantly women, inactive comparator and no evidence of reduced self-injury. Trained facilitators and harm-reduction procedures matter.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- lab Relevance
- relationship
- inspired-by
- implication
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually.
- transfer Limit
- Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- sources
- type
- primary bibliographic record
- url
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- sha256
- 83282780b77af578d69a78aa23cb1cf1ce0778056ea08f53de4323d13132ae1b
- hash Scope
- normalized Europe PMC core metadata snapshot
- type
- publisher DOI
- url
- https://doi.org/10.2196/70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- type
- PMC article
- url
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- access
- Full text cached
- type
- full-text-xml
- url
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:31.947242+00:00
- sha256
- e1483e71a3d91a4d8774d0522886c575aa1924eb5ec2c8c1cd8a51146332fa3d
- type
- DOI-metadata
- url
- https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02T01:21:33.023710+00:00
- sha256
- b58b156bc1152eea42a0b70007e0016b1887b86fa11eb1ee73979b1113c53f7c
- publication Status
- pmid
- 41313154
- checked At
- 2026-11-02T01:32:46.783592+00:00
- pub Types
research-article · Randomized Controlled Trial · Journal Article
- indexed Notices
- None recorded
- crossref Updates
- None recorded
- notice Records
- None recorded
- scope
- Europe PMC indexed publication types/linked notices, publisher JATS related articles and Crossref update-to metadata; absence is not a guarantee of no notice.
- notice Summary
- Indexed related notices are retained below; no retraction identified in this bounded metadata check. This is not an exhaustive guarantee.
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- review Ready
- true
- hold Reason
- Not recorded
- duplicate Of
- Not recorded
- review
- status
- pending
- reviewer
- Not recorded
- approved At
- Not recorded
- decision Scope
- Ben reviews proposed content and release; full medical-paper reading is not required.
- provenance
- Discovered and appraised by AI; pending human content sign-off
- production Eligible
- false
- approved Retrieval Eligible
- false
- selected Corpus References
youth-pmid-36596239 · youth-pmid-36844353
- reference Scope
- Explicit publisher reference identifiers; citation is not proof of inclusion in a meta-analysis.
- content Hash
- 9e3c7f2cf951a3622e1d7e27e193a87aad4526938ec66b1120a36e4dc85788e5
- revision
- r1-9e3c7f2cf951
- archive Entries
- None recorded
- collection
- language
- chapter Number
- 6
- topic Id
- mindfulness-youth
- topic Title
- Mindfulness for youth
- trust Score
- 2
- evidence
- evidence Type
- Randomized controlled trial report · double blinding not verified
- intervention
- Four weekly one-hour online formal or informal mindfulness groups versus inactive control
- provider
- Not separately established; clinician/teacher/app details, if known, are retained in the intervention description
- comparator
- See design/intervention description; otherwise unknown
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- population
- age
- 18+; analysed mean 22.10 (SD 3.37)
- age Fit
- mixed-overlap
- sample
- 293 eligible/invited; 227 analysed, 127 with recent NSSI
- setting
- Not separately established; see population/intervention description
- community
- Not assigned
- measurement
- Specific outcomes are reported in the finding and retained appraisal.
- trial Id
- publication-41313154
- trial Registries
- None recorded
- registry Scope
- Identifiers explicitly reported in article abstract; other registrations remain unverified
- relationship Note
- Offer brief informal options alongside formal practice and assess comfort, choice and safety individually. Component evidence does not establish efficacy of the combined Universal Mind lab model.
- measured Genes
- None recorded
- pathways
- None recorded
- quality
- tier
- qualified
- qualification
- Qualified for the stated design-specific use in a rapid methods-based review, not necessarily low risk of bias or high certainty.
- formal Risk Of Bias Tool Applied
- false
- jadad Score
- Not recorded
- masking Roles
- Allocator and participants unblinded; random-number allocation with ratio changed after differential attrition.
- harms And Attrition
- Not systematically extracted beyond findings/limitations; absence of reporting is not evidence of no harm
- source Access
- scope
- selected-methods
- full Text Cached
- true
- methods Inspected
- true
- full Text Appraisal Claim
- false
- level
- selected-methods
- source URLs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313154/ · https://doi.org/10.2196/70011 · https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661606/ · https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12661606/fullTextXML · https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2196%2F70011
- retrieved At
- 2026-11-02
- jadad
- status
- unassessed
- score
- Not recorded
- condition Evidence
- id
- stress
- evidence
- field
- findings
- text
- Both programmes improved mindfulness, wellbeing and need satisfaction through one month; stress, emotion regulation and academic engagement did not improve. Findings did not differ by NSSI history.
- matched Text
- stress
- scope
- Studied topic or reported outcome, including null findings; no diagnosis, benefit or subgroup membership is inferred.
- conditions
stress
- topic Trust Scores
3 · 2
- full Text
- status
- not-indexed
- retrieval Available
- false